Good catch.
I dont know who is flagging but it apparently meets with the approval of the mods.
If you guys have such a problem, why participate in the thread?
It’s their trademark. Their inability to accept even the most thoroughly proven facts is another.
I doubt it …
…
Lies left unchallenged eventually become accepted as truth.
It’s his inbox that goes off like an alarm clock from all of the baseless flagging and sooner or later he has to sort through them all so I suspect he will.
Ok - so you want to participate. I assume that others feel the same. If that’s true then why are you all flagging one another?
I only flag posts that are inappropriate, misplaced, or that derail threads just as we were asked to do.
In fairness to the Mods, it was a robo response to the flag, not a Mod. Patriot did tell us that he was setting the filter to extreme intolerance, and some members here are using that fact to squelch dissent to their poison.
That and I suspect in an attempt to get their critics banned.
Do you not understand the concept of a discussion board?
WE aren’t.
…
Likely to make it seem as if they are not the ones doing it.
Perhaps they do not realize that admin gets a record of who flags.
…and flags cannot be retracted by the flagger…like 
can.
I haven’t tried it yet, but I suppose one can flag one’s own post.
This just came through in response to my protest of the flag:
Here come da judge! Here come da judge! 
Here is another post flagged by Didge:
Seems he is incapable of accepting even criticism of others let alone himself.
Go ahead Didge, flag this one too.
The threshold for hiding posts is much lower now as a result of the Perspective API. If the API detects language that is likely to be “toxic” then it applies an internal weight to it, depending upon the level of toxicity. If the level of toxicity is high then it generally only takes one flag to hide the post. If the toxicity level is low to non-existent it could take anywhere between two and three flags to hide the post. It all really depends upon how toxic the post is scored. We don’t control that.
As I have said multiple times, unless content is unlawful I am not going to prohibit it from being posted. To me, how people feel about content is irrelevant. All of you have multiple resources to ignore users or entire categories of this forum. If you use these resources you will not see posts from users with whom you vehemently disagree. You will not see content in categories that you do not agree with. Some people need their feelings protected and that’s why we have these tools. If you get triggered by content and words, please use them. They don’t cost you anything. They provide a good balance between hiding content based upon personal preference and sitewide censorship. I am not going to censor anyone who is not breaking our rules. If the content is not illegal, it stays. If you decide to hide the content that you see, or decide to ignore users using our internal controls, that’s fine.
If you choose to engage in a debate with another member of this community who is not violating the rules then please do so respectfully.
I do acknowledge that not every thread needs to turn into a conversation about Zionism, Israel, or ■■■■■ If that continues there will be penalties for thread derailment.
Do not derail threads.
Likewise, if you are engaging in a topic of discussion that you just don’t like that’s not a reason for you to derail a thread either. It’s a two way street.
If this flag war continues everyone who is engaging in it will be banned.
Flagging appropriately is fine. Needless flagging is not. Flagging to make a point or to aggravate others is not.
3 Likes
Admittedly I’ve accidentally done that before and wish there was an “unflag” or “retract” button as well as times when I misread one, flagged it, then read it again and wished I could pull it back.
Is there a way you can put a feature in there that shows who flagged the post and for what reason?
That feature exists but it’s only for those with moderator authority or higher.
I would need to think about turning something like that on. In a case like this, a little bit of public accountability might not be a bad thing; however, in cases where there is really inappropriate stuff going on it might stop someone from flagging a post. Many of our illustrious female members have dealt with some unfortunate comments over direct message. If flags were visible that would make things difficult for them. I could probably list off about a dozen more examples as to why this would be a bad idea…but in this particular context your point is well taken.
2 Likes