Iran and Russia are the only ones that were invited in, ALL the rest are belligerents including the US.
How is the U.S. a belligerent when the soldiers are advisers to the Kurds.
US had advisors in Vietnam.
Great outcome.
Seriously, the US had been busy bombing the Syrian infrastructure and other government targets to weaken the Assad regime which enjoys an overwhelming support from the Syrians.
Oh, the US was also busy bombing no-manâs land in the desert, supposedly to attack ISIS.
Were you there personally to witness what you claim?
Iâm afraid youâre right. Actually the West shouldnât even be in Syria because Assad has never asked us to get involved; in other words the West is violating international law. I wonder what weâd say if Russia did that? Weâd probably accuse Russia of being âmore threatening to global peace and stabilityâ? I mean what abject hypocrisy that would be??
Can your virtual signaling cuckery be any more obvious? lol!
Do you have anything intelligent and constructive to say, or are you just going to keep posting snidey hit-and-run insults?
How about you support your statement with actual facts? Otherwise I stand by my statement! How are you any different than the libtards here who do same?
President Assad has not invited the US into Syria. And Syria has never attacked the United States. Our presence in Syria is a violation of sovereign territory.
Exactly correctâŚ
The US had no business being in Syria, whether boots on the ground or not.
There was a cave from which the US and Israeli âadvisorsâ were directing ISIS, but it was destroyed by Russian cruise missiles from the Caspian Sea, killing all of them.
We donât know yet the exact details and deals among Erdogan, Putin and Trump and should refrain from any hasty conclusions.
And what are you sources as in âWe donât know the exact detailsâ comes from? Who is we? Again, were you there personally to witness in what you are claiming?
We donât know, but you seem to know the exact details.
Enlighten us.
Wrong! The US has legal right to be there! You are either ignorant of how international law works or you are being purposely obtuse! No surprise there!
I ask you! You seem to want to make blanketed generalizations without anything to substantiate your claims. Then again coming from someone who regularly peddles in conspiracy theories and innuendos that pretty much is par for the course for you!
Sure, the US has legal rights to be everywhere (as long as the perceived enemy has no nukes)
Thatâs why I asked you to enlighten us.
(And donât waste the space here with a lot of hot air and empty words)