Tsunami Videos šŸ‡ÆšŸ‡µ

Pure unadulterated BS.

There was a single quake, recorded on a known fault and hundreds of after shocks all recorded.

The reactors were over 40 years old and failed because of the runaway heating from the uncontrolled reaction.

There is nothing the least bit unconventional about the explosions or the smoke that came from them.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SGcyKpUnyLc

The cores were breached due to the meltdown period, that isnā€™t hard to understand.

Superheated water breaks down into H2 and O, ignites and explodes destroying the buildings. Again, not hard to understand.

Muddy flood waters? Seriously youā€™re going to claim thatā€™s due to a nuclear explosion? If thatā€™s the case every flood event in world history must be due to nuclear explosions.

Youā€™re entire premise here is utterly insane and not supported be even a single known fact.

Sorry, I was there. At Narita Airport. There were three quakes.

Muddy water didnā€™t reach everywhere but at least in the photo I copied and pasted.

They claimed it was M9.
M9 is so powerful, it can Atlantis sink.
No, it was M5 at most in northern Japan.

Core melted down in two days, eh?
And if hydrogen is so powerful, why make bombs?
Just drop liquefied hydrogen in wars.

The muddy water is the effluent. You were there at the time? BS.

The quake was recorded, you canā€™t hide an earthquake and you canā€™t fake one.

For hydrogen to have such explosive power requires it being under pressure when detonated. The containment buildings provide that pressure as the super heated steam builds pressure in the enclosed environment.

BS to you. Look at the photo you originally posted.

Yes, the earthquake was recorded.
Japanā€™s Meteorological Agency said it was a series of earthquakes which donā€™t happen in nature.

Hydrogen is indeed dangerous, including all balloons. LOL

All quakes have pre and or aftershocks. Youā€™re fabricating BS that anyone who has even taken an 8th grade earth science class knows is BS.

http://www.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/asiapcf/03/12/quake.tsunami.timeline/index.html

Magnitude 9.0ā€“9.1 (Mw)

This is total BS because Magnitude 9.0ā€“9.1 can sink Atlantis, and yet wooden houses and concrete buildings (only 50 miles or so away from the epicenter) were not affected at all. People were still walking and cars driving on streets as usual after the quakes. ONLY WHEN THE TSUNAMI CAME houses along the coast were destroyed by water.

It was fake (artificial) earthquakes by coordinated underground blasts, including the one offshore that caused the tsunami, at different locations to give the IMPRESSION that it was a major, earth-shattering earthquake, which it was not.

I was working at a police station right next to Narita Airport as a translator for the cops who were interviewing an Nigerian caught with trunk-full of funny stuff. It started out as a fairly strong earthquake, it came and went away, but then came another and another in a matter of a few minutes. Ainā€™t no way it was natural.

Fukushima was blown up by Israeli terrorism

http://82.221.129.208/fukureport1b.pdf

All completely fabricated BS that isnā€™t supported by even a single verifiable fact anywhere.

The quakeā€™s epicenter was over 40 miles offshore so no structures felt the full force of the quake.

Just curious, since weā€™ve had at least one worse quake recorded right here in the US how is it all of Alaska didnā€™t disappear under the ocean if what you claim holds any truth?

which means M9 is a total BS story.
I repeat: M9 is so powerful, it can make a continent disappear (and/or new land appear from the sea).

M5 or M6 happens every once in a while.

To help put that exponential difference in perspective, imagine that the energy released from a 3.9 earthquake is equal to a single grain of sand. On that scale, here would be the difference between different earthquake magnitudes:

  • Magnitude 3.9 = 1 grain of sand
  • Magnitude 4 = 3 grains
  • Magnitude 5 = 95 grains
  • Magnitude 6 = 3,052 grains (a small handful)
  • Magnitude 7 = 97,656 grains
  • Magnitude 8 = 3,125,000 grains (about 18 pounds)
  • Magnitude 9 = 100,000,000 grains (about 572 pounds)

The destruction in Japan was due to tsunami, not due to earthquake per se.

And youā€™re still peddling pure BS.

You claimed above that the structures near the quakeā€™s epicenter could not survive such a quake. Now youā€™re claiming there was no major quake.

Provide anything from any credible source that supports your claim that there were three major quakes and that such quakes cannot happen naturally.

Explain why AK is not submerged due to the 9.2 quake in the sixties if your theory holds any water.

Youā€™re drowning in a cesspool filled with your own BS.

Enough of your name calling.

How can buildings stand (wooden or concrete) only 50 miles from the epicenter in an M9 earthquake?

It was NOT an M9 earthquake. Plain and simple.
Realistically, it was M4 or M5 at most.

(Look at thousands of tsunami videos. No building destroyed in the earthquake prior to arrival of tsunami)

Give me a break.

Yet all the seismic reports show that it was a 9.0.

Is the whole world lying?

Iā€™m still waiting for you to explain why AK isnā€™t an inland sea following the 9.2 you claim is more than enough to sink an entire continent.

ā€¦not to mention that sometimes earthquakes cause dry land to rise rather than move downward.

2 Likes

Goes to show government agencies are not trustworthy.
You seem to believe everything Deep State says.
I was at a location roughly 150 miles from the (supposed) epicenter on 3-11-2011. If it was M9 or M9.1, I wouldnā€™t be here.

I donā€™t know what AK is.

It is true.
A big earthquake hit Tokyo/Yokohama in 1923 and the magnitude is estimated to have been M8.
The epicenter could not be pinned down because of the poor measuring techniques in those days, but it was west of Tokyo somewhere.
As a result of this earthquake, an island rose about 50 cm.
image

So weā€™re supposed to accept your fabricated bullshit as fact and dismiss the input of every accepted and respected authority on the subject because what? Because you will buy into or fabricate the most ridiculous conspiracies out of absolutely nothing?

AK, Alaska, the same state in the US in which we had a 9.2 in the sixties.

Alaska is still there and Atlantis is still nothing but a legend and the best evidence supporting the legend says Atlantis was located on the Island of Sardinia which was destroyed in a flash in a massive volcanic eruption which all but obliterated the entire Island.

A reasonable person would ask why non of your bullshit theories can be supported by any known fact or credible source and how any sane person could give you the least bit of credence for any of your insane claims.

This is from a Japanese wikipedia page:
M9+
ꕰ100恋悉1000Km恮ēÆ„å›²ć§å¤§ććŖåœ°ę®»å¤‰å‹•ć‚’ē”Ÿć˜ć€åŗƒåŸŸć§å¤§ē½å®³ćƒ»å¤§ę“„ę³¢

It says large scale tectonic changes are caused and major disasters and major tsunami follow in large areas of several hundred to one thousand km.

(Tsunami videos show the houses remained intact and people were walking, and cars driving normally afterwards (before the tsunami came). And it was only 50 or 60 km from supposed epiceter)

M9+ happens only once in several hundred years (around a specific area).

If 9.2 happens repeatedly be it in Japan or Alaska, thereā€™s something fishy there (with the folks who claim M9+)