No, observing.
I guess by that you mean we have CCTV everywhere? It’s great! I feel a lot safer. There is less chance of someone jumping on me when there are CCTV’s around.
Pakistan.
I know we have done this to death but it really fascinates me that so many ppl still believe it.
1 Like
A lot came in from Uganda in the 70s, however since they were described at the time as ‘Asians’ it is possible that a lot were Hindus.
Prove their CB aren’t owned by the Rothschilds
The absence of any proof that they are leads us to the logical onclusion that they aren’t
In layman terms, ‘I have no proof’.
So why the inconsistency, you have no proof the Rothschild own the other central banks, and no proof they don’t own China etc.
Are you just making it up as you go… probably.
On the contrary - there is ample proof that all western(and some eastern) CB’s are owned by the Rothschilds
No there’s not.
I used to believe the Rothschilds owned the central banks for years and did substantial reading on the issue. Despite never finding any convincing evidence the Rothschilds own any central bank I kept believing.
I gave my belief up when I met true believers like you. I realised the idea was kept going by lies and half truths, along with a misunderstanding of how central banks work.
In the absence of any evidence, I asked myself a simple question. ‘Why would governments allow the Rothschilds to control their money, and then pay interest to the Rothschilds’. The most obvious answer (by far) is the Rothschilds don’t own the central banks, and governments don’t pay the Rothschilds any money.
The absence of proof is not proof of absence.
“I have never seen a black swan; therefore there are no black swans.”
Of course, so you have to ask what’s likely. Something highly improbable that would require a cooperative global conspiracy, or something far more likely that doesn’t involve and cooperative global conspiracy? The absence of proof supports the latter simpler explanation.
So you have a picture of two black swans to prove black swans do exist. All we need now is proof that the Rothschilds own the central banks.
I personally have nothing to prove in regard to what they own. I suppose they control enough money to have significant influence on banking decisions. They might as well own them.
1 Like
There is no proof that The Rothschild own any banks! While I might be inclined to believe they wield a large swath of influence in elite circles, (a different speculative discussion of course) due to the fact their estimated worth in 2018 is around 400 billion dollars, there is no proof whatsoever that they actually own any banks.
Central banks don’t have private owners as a rule, with the only notable exception being the US Federal Reserve bank, which is owned jointly by a number of major US private banks. For example:
- The Bank of England is owned an run by the UK government.
- The Bank of Canada is a crown corporation, owned and operated by the Canadian Government
- The Reserve Bank of Australia is wholly owned by the Commonwealth of Australia
The European central banks are similarly government institutions, and they share ownership of the European Central Bank.
It is a relatively simple matter to find the legislative acts that created each institution, which give precise terms of ownership and governance of each.
Like the masons, the lower degree members don’t know squat. It’s a pyramid.
5 Likes
2 Likes
2 Likes
Saved to my playlist. Thanks for sharing it. I miss the innocence and the not shitty song structures that happened in the 80’s.
BTW, that blonde couldn’t play bass worth shit. But the drummer, she seemed to know what she’s doing.
Thank you Alex for sharing this! I got quite a bit of information from watching this. Really great stuff and confirms my research and the trail my hound has been on! I wonder what techniques or methods he would prescribe in order to tap into those higher frequencies that he talks about. I would be really interested in exploring this subject matter further.
1 Like