The Green New Deal

1 Like

and how many billions later …

stupid leftists

1 Like

Didn’t bother them last time it got that high. They thought it was good for us.

Of course, it was major contributor to crashing the economy 2008-09 but they won’t even acknowledge that.

They’ll probably vote “Present” again instead of taking a stand.

LA and SD?

They canceled the LA to SF HS rail project which was the heart of the entire plan.

A high-speed rail line linking Los Angeles to San Francisco was the goal when voters approved a ballot measure in 2008. The roughly 520-mile line initially was estimated to cost $33bn and was pegged for completion in 2020. Officials eventually hoped to connect the line to San Diego and Sacramento.

How can you claim to live in LA and know so little about the nuttiest leftwing project in decades?

Screenshot_12

4 Likes

Honestly, who but Democrats would spend more on a failed rail project than the towns they connect are worth.

Exactly? Your post agrees with mine…

But just think of the jobs it creates!

1 Like

Think of the billions of Federal Tax dollars wasted.

No, not even close but nice try.

Who cares? Most of them ended up in the pockets of democrat donors and will just be recycled back to the politicians.

California Governor Gavin Newsom said on Tuesday the state will dramatically scale back a planned $77.3 billion high-speed rail project that has faced cost hikes, delays and management concerns, but will finish a smaller section of the line.

“Let’s be real. The current project, as planned, would cost too much and respectfully take too long. There’s been too little oversight and not enough transparency,” Newsom said in his first State of the State Address to lawmakers on Tuesday.

“Right now, there simply isn’t a path to get from Sacramento to San Diego, let alone from San Francisco to L.A. (Los Angeles). I wish there were,” he said.

Newsom said the state will complete a 119-mile (191 km) high-speed rail link between Merced and Bakersfield in the state’s Central Valley. In March 2018, the state forecast the costs had jumped by $13 billion to $77 billion and warned that the costs could be as much as $98.1 billion.

Newsom said he would not give up entirely on the effort and will continue to seek additional funding.

California planned to build a 520-mile (826.8 km) system in the first phase that would allow trains to travel at speeds of up to 220 miles per hour (354 kph) in the traffic-choked state from Los Angeles to San Francisco and begin full operations by 2033.

“Abandoning high-speed rail entirely means we will have wasted billions and billions of dollars with nothing but broken promises, partially filled commitments and lawsuits to show for it,” Newsom said. "And by the way, I am not interested in sending $3.5 billion in federal funding that was allocated to this project back to Donald Trump."

U.S. House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee Republicans cited a recent Democratic clean energy proposal in noting the project’s demise, tweeting that “the plug gets pulled on the frequently delayed, over-budget San Francisco-LA (high-speed rail) project. Reality: 1, #GreenNewDeal: 0.”

A state audit issued in November said California’s High‑Speed Rail Authority’s "flawed decision making and poor contract management have contributed to billions in cost overruns and delays."

The Obama administration awarded the state a total of $3.5 billion in 2010 and California voters in 2008 approved nearly $10 billion in bond proceeds. The U.S. Transportation Department’s inspector general’s office noted in August 2018 that the state had only identified $30.7 billion in funding, or less than half the project’s needs.

A spokesman for U.S. Transportation Secretary Elaine Chao did not immediately comment.

Newsom said the state will finish environmental reviews from San Francisco to Los Angeles, “connect the revitalized Central Valley to other parts of the state, and continue to push for more federal funding and private dollars. But let’s just get something done.”

The governor also said he will name his economic development director, Lenny Mendonca, to chair the High-Speed Rail Authority, and vowed new transparency and to hold contractors and consultants accountable to explain how tax dollars are spent.

“I’m not interested in making the same old mistakes,” Newsom said.

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/california-not-complete-77-billion-high-speed-rail-202115385.html

With the cancellation of the project I don’t see how he can hang onto all of the federal money. It will be funny to see the reaction when this administration claws it back.

Newsom said the state will complete a 119-mile (191 km) high-speed rail link between Merced and Bakersfield in the state’s Central Valley. In March 2018, the state forecast the costs had jumped by $13 billion to $77 billion and warned that the costs could be as much as $98.1 billion.

A monolith to man’s stupidity.

It seems a whole lot of folks are completely ignorante of US History.

We tried mass transit nationwide from the thirties through the sixties and it failed miserably and was a financial black hole. It always has been and always will be outside of high density population areas.

Americans enjoy the freedom of the road, the ability to stop, turn around, pull over, grab a bite to eat, smoke a cigarette or just to go and “see what’s over there”.

Mass transit is a last resort in this country for people with no other choice.

1 Like

Yes.
It’s even part of our culture. It is analogous to how we live our lives. And in this big wide open country, it is more necessary than in cities - which seems to be AOC’s target audience.

People in the high density population areas really seem to have no idea whatsoever how the rest of the country lives, nor do they care.

The GND is the pitcher plant of the AGW swamp.

Beautiful, alluring, deadly.

What I don’t get is how they keep mentioning all the jobs it will create. Have they not noticed we are pretty much at full employment already?

2 Likes