It won’t happen, this is the whole point, not enough bodies to enforce their bullshit hence the need for the fear mongering, so the sheep don’t even need a Border Collie to get them in the pen. 
Who the hell would miss these pair of arseholes !!
1 Like
I still don’t understand why anyone still listens to this fuckwit either
3 Likes
- Albert Bourla, the CEO of Pfizer, doesn’t share the confidence of his own claims. On the day his company issued its press release on the proposed vaccine trials, he sold 62% of his stock in Pfizer, making millions profit in the deal. He made the sell order in a special option in August so it would not appear as “insider selling”, however he also timed it just after the US elections
BioNTech, which has developed the radical mRNA technique used to produce the new corona vaccine. BioNTech was only founded in 2008. BioNTech signed an agreement with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation in September, 2019
Be the resistance, get out to one of these events and show you will not comply to being under house arrest or the silly masks!! Imagine if the young kids never get to see an unmasked face in public anymore ? How will they learn to interpret facial expressions and read situations ? It is taking away another sense as well as showing compliance, f*** 'em !!!
2 Likes
Vaccinated people are basically asymptomatic carries of the pathogen.
And they are very contagious too!
Just another cohencidence.
Why am I not surprised
Bourla was born and raised in Thessaloniki, Greece.[2] Born into a Jooish family - from Wiki
1 Like
The sheeple are waking up
3 post rule
Facts about vaccines the government doesn’t want you to know
1 Like
When babies and small children get hurt by vaccines, who is to blame?
The medical establishment or stupid parents?
And who pays the price?
Certainly not the medical establishment.
Politicians often claim to follow the science, but that is a misleading oversimplification. Science is rarely absolute. It rarely applies to every setting or every population. It doesn’t make sense to slavishly follow science or evidence. A better approach is for politicians, the publicly appointed decision makers, to be informed and guided by science when they decide policy for their public. But even that approach retains public and professional trust only if science is available for scrutiny and free of political interference , and if the system is transparent and not compromised by conflicts of interest.
2 Likes
I thought it was mutating into a six-pointed star.
Oh well, what’s the freaking difference?
1 Like
Banksters who control the central bank can create as much money as they wish out of thin air.
And they do the funding for “scientific research”
1 Like
He’s calling it for what it is, a hoax promoted by the MSM.
1 Like