Official 2020-2021 Presidential Election Thread

3 Likes

I’ve stated multiple times in multiple threads here that SCOTUS wouldn’t even hear the illegitimate Texas lawsuit to mocking by the Trumpers. Looks like SCOTUS dismissed the Texas nonsense…:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:

Can’t say I am not disappointed, however what’s next will be telling! If they are unwilling to hear a case based on the evidence and hide behind technicalities then we are either in for some really dark times or people start showing courage and stand up Jan 6 to refuse to vote for this fraud! RINOS are on notice!

Looks more likely the outcome for Trump if you’ve heard about the Manhattan DA’s case…

Well to begin with, Didge doesn’t have a dog in the race, and, we don’t overturn elections in America. Elections are decided by ballots not briefs. And finally, after today with SCOTUS tossing the Texas frivolous lawsuit, which 18 other state AG’s were stupid enough to hang their hats on…

It’s finished, OVER. :wink:

1 Like

Yep, wins a tiny battle and loses the war…:rofl:

And non existent, don’t forget that part…:roll_eyes:

No, Wisconsin has certified it’s electors to Joe Biden…

You do just enough to trigger the propagandist in house trolls here! :rofl:

Works every time! :rofl:

1 Like

Turned out not to be credible at all…,:man_shrugging:

https://youtu.be/DiUzRdJI-YY

RAT

https://youtu.be/TmENMZFUU_0

1 Like

And he didn’t! And yes, you set back and accept defeat just as has been done by the losing side for the country’s history, nothings different…:wink:

So here’s what the Trump appointed judge in Pennsylvania concluded when he dismissed outright Trump’s suit there…

ā€œFree, fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy. Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here, ā€œVoters, not lawyers, choose the president. Ballots, not briefs, decide elections. [The] campaign’s claims have no merit.ā€

In Texas, Trump wanted relief, he wanted (His) SCOTUS to overturn the election results. Not only did they not do that, they refused to even hear the case, let alone grant relief. Even Thomas and Alito who thought that SCOTUS did have the jurisdiction to hear the case, stated had they, they would not have voted for relief…

It’s DONE!!!

2 Likes

Like impetuous children embarrassing themselves.

Sorry … allow me to re-post my comment

< sarcasm >
Only 150 million ??
That’s way not enough !
< /sarcasm >