Official 2020-2021 Presidential Election Thread

3 Likes

Iā€™ve stated multiple times in multiple threads here that SCOTUS wouldnā€™t even hear the illegitimate Texas lawsuit to mocking by the Trumpers. Looks like SCOTUS dismissed the Texas nonsenseā€¦:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:

Canā€™t say I am not disappointed, however whatā€™s next will be telling! If they are unwilling to hear a case based on the evidence and hide behind technicalities then we are either in for some really dark times or people start showing courage and stand up Jan 6 to refuse to vote for this fraud! RINOS are on notice!

Looks more likely the outcome for Trump if youā€™ve heard about the Manhattan DAā€™s caseā€¦

Well to begin with, Didge doesnā€™t have a dog in the race, and, we donā€™t overturn elections in America. Elections are decided by ballots not briefs. And finally, after today with SCOTUS tossing the Texas frivolous lawsuit, which 18 other state AGā€™s were stupid enough to hang their hats onā€¦

Itā€™s finished, OVER. :wink:

1 Like

Yep, wins a tiny battle and loses the warā€¦:rofl:

And non existent, donā€™t forget that partā€¦:roll_eyes:

No, Wisconsin has certified itā€™s electors to Joe Bidenā€¦

You do just enough to trigger the propagandist in house trolls here! :rofl:

Works every time! :rofl:

1 Like

Turned out not to be credible at allā€¦,:man_shrugging:

https://youtu.be/DiUzRdJI-YY

RAT

https://youtu.be/TmENMZFUU_0

1 Like

And he didnā€™t! And yes, you set back and accept defeat just as has been done by the losing side for the countryā€™s history, nothings differentā€¦:wink:

So hereā€™s what the Trump appointed judge in Pennsylvania concluded when he dismissed outright Trumpā€™s suit thereā€¦

ā€œFree, fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy. Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here, ā€œVoters, not lawyers, choose the president. Ballots, not briefs, decide elections. [The] campaignā€™s claims have no merit.ā€

In Texas, Trump wanted relief, he wanted (His) SCOTUS to overturn the election results. Not only did they not do that, they refused to even hear the case, let alone grant relief. Even Thomas and Alito who thought that SCOTUS did have the jurisdiction to hear the case, stated had they, they would not have voted for reliefā€¦

Itā€™s DONE!!!

2 Likes

Like impetuous children embarrassing themselves.

Sorry ā€¦ allow me to re-post my comment

< sarcasm >
Only 150 million ??
Thatā€™s way not enough !
< /sarcasm >