I guess Gorka and his family are secret Hungarian Communist Agents that immigrated into the U.S.
2 Likes
Yea, the 302âs are going to hang them all.
Gorka is a bit of a nut but heâs our nut and heâs certainly got the national security credâs to be taken seriously.
Another excellent interview with Tony Schaeffer. They cover a lot of ground here. He said indictments are forthcoming. Who would you predict is going to be first?
Comey? Brennen? or the others like Strozok? Nellie Ohr? McCabe?
I donât know but I suspect theyâll start low on the list to try and work their way up with deals to get as much as possible on the key players.
1 Like
Just a reminder, the grand jury investigations into this began towards the end of 2018 under the DOJ SDNY.
This onion is being peeled one layer at a time. I think the timing is going to work out such that next summer as we approach the conventions this is going to get very hot.
Just as the left is going to ramp up their rhetoric and violent attacks, so too shall the opposition use their tools (rule of Law) in the fight for what is considered a fight to the death and the soul of the country. Sedition and treason should not be tolerated and it needs to be stated and made an example of.
I hate to say it but Iâm afraid itâs going to get well beyond what the rule of law can control.
Imagine the Rodney King Riots spreading to most of the major cities around the country and even to many of the smaller ones.
Worse, imagine them going on simultaneously all across the country.
Now imagine the level of force from the govât required to quell them.
Not only will the left have succeed in destroying much of the civil society they the response will be used to label Trump as a Nazi taking over the country by force to eliminate the opposition.
Now, review the principles of Alinskyâs Rules for Radicals.
RULE 1: âPower is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have.â
Power is derived from 2 main sources â money and people. âHave-Notsâ must build power from flesh and blood. (These are two things of which there is a plentiful supply. Government and corporations always have a difficult time appealing to people, and usually do so almost exclusively with economic arguments.)
RULE 2: âNever go outside the expertise of your people.â
It results in confusion, fear and retreat. Feeling secure adds to the backbone of anyone. (Organizations under attack wonder why radicals donât address the ârealâ issues. This is why. They avoid things with which they have no knowledge.)
RULE 3: âWhenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy.â
Look for ways to increase insecurity, anxiety and uncertainty. (This happens all the time. Watch how many organizations under attack are blind-sided by seemingly irrelevant arguments that they are then forced to address.)
RULE 4: âMake the enemy live up to its own book of rules.â
If the rule is that every letter gets a reply, send 30,000 letters. You can kill them with this because no one can possibly obey all of their own rules. (This is a serious rule. The besieged entityâs very credibility and reputation is at stake, because if activists catch it lying or not living up to its commitments, they can continue to chip away at the damage.)
RULE 5: âRidicule is manâs most potent weapon.â
There is no defense. Itâs irrational. Itâs infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions. (Pretty crude, rude and mean, huh? They want to create anger and fear.)
RULE 6: âA good tactic is one your people enjoy.â
Theyâll keep doing it without urging and come back to do more. Theyâre doing their thing, and will even suggest better ones. (Radical activists, in this sense, are no different that any other human being. We all avoid âun-funâ activities, and but we revel at and enjoy the ones that work and bring results.)
RULE 7: âA tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.â
Donât become old news. (Even radical activists get bored. So to keep them excited and involved, organizers are constantly coming up with new tactics.)
RULE 8: âKeep the pressure on. Never let up.â
Keep trying new things to keep the opposition off balance. As the opposition masters one approach, hit them from the flank with something new. (Attack, attack, attack from all sides, never giving the reeling organization a chance to rest, regroup, recover and re-strategize.)
RULE 9: âThe threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.â
Imagination and ego can dream up many more consequences than any activist. (Perception is reality. Large organizations always prepare a worst-case scenario, something that may be furthest from the activistsâ minds. The upshot is that the organization will expend enormous time and energy, creating in its own collective mind the direst of conclusions. The possibilities can easily poison the mind and result in demoralization.)
RULE 10: âIf you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive.â
Violence from the other side can win the public to your side because the public sympathizes with the underdog. (Unions used this tactic. Peaceful [albeit loud] demonstrations during the heyday of unions in the early to mid-20th Century incurred managementâs wrath, often in the form of violence that eventually brought public sympathy to their side.)
RULE 11: âThe price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.â
Never let the enemy score points because youâre caught without a solution to the problem. (Old saw: If youâre not part of the solution, youâre part of the problem. Activist organizations have an agenda, and their strategy is to hold a place at the table, to be given a forum to wield their power. So, they have to have a compromise solution.)
RULE 12: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.â
Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions. (This is cruel, but very effective. Direct, personalized criticism and ridicule works.)
Now remember, if you repeat a lie often enough and forcefully enough it becomes the truth.
Yeah! I know this, and pretty much all applies when considering what we are seeing today unfold!
Well this is breaking news and a bit of a surprised as well as confusing because what will this mean in the grander scheme of things? What are the implications
Hold on to your seat!
It probably means he/she is trying to cover for friends/party members. It wontâ hold up.
EDTA: The way I read this the FBI was wanting to release only heavily redacted summaries that were to be drafted by them allowing them to hide a lot.
It appears heâs now ordering the full release of the AMâs with no redaction.
Saw this yesterday, Ohr and his wife both belong in prison along with at least five others that participated or green lighted this program.
1 Like
This is pretty damning if it turns out to be true!
1 Like
They never should have, âaskedâ to begin with, they should have shown up with search and arrest warrants in hand.
The lawyers cannot legally possess them and for Hillary to keep them and remove them after she left office is a serious felony under federal statutes.
Exactly! Which is why IMO that they will eventually will have to give someone up because of this reason alone! This is pretty hard to look past and not think that a grave injustice was committed here!
1 Like
Weâve long had a tradition in this country of not going after previous administrations criminally but the last administration I think has so many offenses that are so egregious that itâs time for that tradition to end.
1 Like
I totally agree! My thinking however is will they be preoccupied with the thought of sending the country into a tailspin of chaos as being something too much to stomach?
The democrats are already planning that for 2020 so I wouldnât let it be a consideration as far as prosecutions go.
Do whatâs right and deal with the consequences.