Was Johnson and Clinton impeached…yes or no???
Oops!
Maybe I should have posted this here…
There is a video link which has failed to propagate, you will have to look in the other thread.
No, there hasn’t been anything approaching a fair investigation of Trump, that’s why the only bipartisan support is in opposition to impeachment. 
The ambiguous rules of impeachment were followed. House democrats demonstrated that Trump ABUSED his office. That is why you see in a recent Fox News poll that a majority of Americans believe he abused his office, that is why the house impeached him. Pity that not a republican had the spine to follow that evidence. If we ever get to it, it may be different in the senate where we could see Murkowski, Romney and Collins convict.
And if you could only prove it, another made up fact spoken with authority to make people believe you know what you are talking about when you don’t.
1 Like
Beside that, this drive for a phony impeachment of Trump was tagged as a coup a long time ago…by Democrats!
You do realize that you’re wasting your time trying to have an honest, civil discussion with Monty, I’m sure. His cognizance rating is extremely low, he repeats himself and creates his own unsubstantiated “facts”.
1 Like
No. They demonstrated that they abused THEIR office as well as the American people.
2 Likes
Indeed however I am sick of his self acknowledged truth which is nothing but his opinion.
Patriot allowing him back a mistake as he bings nothing to the forum.
2 Likes
Total lie.
Prove it Buffy.
Prove it Buffy.
Not 1 credible witness, all hearsay.
Hearsay is not evidence. When will you stop with the lies???
And I’ve got that in spades - in fact, so far as educational qualifications are concerned it’s the only thing I’ve got. 
1 Like
My gut feeling, looking from the outside in, is that that was an error of judgement. As I’ve previously asserted, it could be argued that DJT had suspicions which needed checking out.
When are going to realize you are only fueling someone who consistently rails here because they are a sufferer of TDS and will rack themselves because being a sadist is much more satisfying?
I only assert my own opinions as I see things; if they happen to support a sympathetic stance of another poster then it’s coincidental.
Holy crap dude! You really did miss us! 
As with many of your posts Dr M - no comprendo. Oh and you forgot to tell me how many Chinese acquaintances told you what’s (supposedly 
) going on in the Chinese ‘concentration camps’? It isn’t too late! 
1 Like
At least ten people testified to the intent and purpose of DJT’s Ukrainian interest with regards to them investigating Joe Biden and the release of security aid…
First of all you never asked, nor did I tell. Secondly if you think that the claims are not true then you really are one naive dude! Then again you conversing with Montecrusty its no surprise! 
Don’t worry I still love you!
I don’t think I’m naive, I think it’s you who has got the wrong end of the stick, because I’m defending The Donald in this topic, same as you? If there’s one thing I ain’t, it’s naive, especially in these days of overt lying in the Western press and all government circles. In other words I’d rather draw my own conclusions than believe even one word of what they tell me - you should try it, starting with the drivel they’re putting out about Chinese concentration camps??
Dude your are the one who is denying something that is pretty common knowledge and accepted as a fact by many but you. So yes while you may not be naive about a lot of things, you most certainly are when it comes to this particular subject matter! BTW, DJT has nothing to do with why I called you Naive so do try to keep up!