Impeachment - Pro and Con

[TWR]

Support from democrats? Sure. The rest of the country? Not so much.

[Roxiebell]

I wanted to emphasize the word evidence thats why I put it in quotation marks, next time I’ll just use the bold function.

[TWR]

Facts are wasted on CITM.

[pjohns]

@montecresto1

No, the hard left isn’t the majority of the democratic base, but just like you hard righties, they’re the LOUDEST.

I do find it quite amusing that you consider me to be a part of “hard right,” as Ronald Reagan–a conservative, certainly; but never a part of the “hard right”–was the very finest president in my lifetime (which began in 1948), in my opinion.

[montecresto1]

@pjohns

I do find it quite amusing that you consider me to be a part of “hard right,” as Ronald Reagan–a conservative, certainly; but never a part of the “hard right”–was the very finest president in my lifetime (which began in 1948), in my opinion.

Ronald Reagan was a gentleman and brought honor to the office, I’ll gladly grant you that. Donald Trump is but a pimple on his ass.

[pjohns]

@montecresto1

@madison

The other reason that impeachment is crucial is that Trumpism must be unconditionally repudiated.

You can’t just impeach on the grounds you want to rid the country of “Trumpism”.

Correct.

And you should remember this…

[pjohns]

@montecresto1

@pjohns

I do find it quite amusing that you consider me to be a part of “hard right,” as Ronald Reagan–a conservative, certainly; but never a part of the “hard right”–was the very finest president in my lifetime (which began in 1948), in my opinion.

Ronald Reagan was a gentleman and brought honor to the office, I’ll gladly grant you that. Donald Trump is but a pimple on his ass.

Donald Trump has a much different style than Ronald Reagan did. (Perhaps it has something to do with the difference between New York City and California.)

I really do not care for the confrontational–almost pugilistic–style of Donald Trump.

But I will have to admit that he does get things done.

And I am in his corner because of that, as I much prefer substance over style…

[montecresto1]

@pjohns

And you should remember this…

I don’t have to remember it, I authored the comment…

[montecresto1]

@pjohns

Donald Trump has a much different style than Ronald Reagan did.

Lol, now that is the most incontrovertible statement of the day, and fortuitous.

[asaratis]

Italics works as well.

Often one has to treat paranoid idiots with kid gloves.

[montecresto1]

@Roxiebell

I wanted to emphasize the word evidence thats why I put it in quotation marks, next time I’ll just use the bold function.

Yes, bold would be the appropriate way for emphasis, quotations if your repeating what someone else said.

[asaratis]

Study up, young man.

Other uses of quotations marks Writing about letters and words Quotation marks can be used when referring to a specific word or letter. (Some writers instead use italics for this purpose, as I have in this guide.)

From Quotation marks | The Punctuation Guide
© 2019 thepunctuationguide.com

This is exactly what @Roxiebell properly did.

[montecresto1]

@pjohns

I really do not care for the confrontational–almost pugilistic–style of Donald Trump.

Right, and you certainly are not alone. Pity that he doesn’t get more flack from his supporters on that. Obviously getting flack from his detractors is of no use it seems to embolden him; and his small, hard core base applauds like walrus’s.

[pjohns]

@montecresto1

@pjohns

I really do not care for the confrontational–almost pugilistic–style of Donald Trump.

Right, and you certainly are not alone. Pity that he doesn’t get more flack from his supporters on that. Obviously getting flack from his detractors is of no use it seems to embolden him; and his small, hard core base applauds like walrus’s.

For some reason–and I really do not understand just why–you appear to be of the opinion that everyone must either love or hate Donald Trump.

It seems to me that it is far better to simply view him analytically, rather than as either a pro-Trump or an anti-Trump partisan. This allows one to see both the good and the bad in the man.

But you seem to be (rather regrettably, I believe) quite anti-Trump.

[pjohns]

[quote=“montecresto1, post:128, topic:2808, full:true”]

@pjohns

And you should remember this…[/quote]

I don’t have to remember it, I authored the comment…[/quote]

Yes, you did.

But you often seem to have forgotten your own words: “You can’t just impeach on the grounds you want to rid the country of ‘Trumpism’.”

[montecresto1]

How does that address what I said. Don’t you too wish that his advisors, members of his cabinet, maybe his boss Sean Hannity, would say something to him about it? Maybe Melania.

[DMK]

Hiya Roxibell! Welcome!

[DMK]

No the hard right, the center right and many centrists never came to grips or agreed with fundamentally changing this country into something it was never intended to be.

Trump is not trying to change the country but trying to undo all of the damage done by the spineless, gutless politicians before him.

Sad that the Constitution has no more meaning to some than a roll of paper in a bathroom.

[DMK]

I’ve noticed it is a trait leftists seem to have.

Most seem to have a difficult time with separation of liking or disliking a person with liking or disliking their actions.

You can dislike Trump the man immensely, but very much support his stances on illegal immigration, travel bans, tariffs, etc.

[TWR]

I can stand Trump “the man”. Most of what he’s done policy wise though has been right on.