It is mere sarcasm to conflate a supporter with a “boss.”
How can you expect to be taken seriously when you rely upon sarcasm in place of serious analysis?
It was most certainly salient…
And I would add that SH is an “unofficial” advisor to Trump and far more than just supporter.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.businessinsider.com/sean-hannity-trump-shadow-chief-of-staff-2018-4
Then we could never possibly take Donald trump serious. 
Is that something that you can prove? Or concerning which, at least, supply some convincing evidence?
Or is it just a “hunch” that you have?
It’s primarily a hunch based upon the proximity of Hannity nightly talking points with Trump tweets.
Good enough. Got it…
They’re friends, not exactly a surprise they talk frequently. Also note that it is of course a completely unsourced claim.
bingo, bango and bongo
that is one of the problem of the left , they cannot separate their Feelings for the guy.
3 Likes
The Democrat Party pushes for its own advancement over the needs of the American people.
3 Likes
Luckily lying on an internet political forum isn’t perjury, like Clinton’s was in a deposition taken in the Paula Jones lawsuit. Clinton also pressured subordinates to lie, suborning perjury. A President of the US committing perjury, tsk tsk says the lying liberal.
“I tried to walk a fine line between acting lawfully and testifying falsely, but I now recognize that I did not fully accomplish that goal and that certain of my responses to questions about Ms. Lewinsky were false,” Clinton said.
Yeah, it’s a fine line in the world of the liberal.
Well that’s a complete lie. Clinton was impeached for lying to a federal court in a civil suit.
Correct. Specifically he committed the crime of perjury, for which many people are sitting in federal prison right now. And there is no question that he committed the crime: Its a fact. The fact that corrupt Democrats voted him innocent in the Senate trial is just more proof that Democrats are corrupt liars.
bingo, couldnt have said it any better Trump Train.
that was the reality the senate vote was 55 to acquit 45 to convict in the first article ( perjury) and 50-50 on the obstruction charge
55 corrupt senators voted to acquit the bastard, and one of the those corrupt bastards Diane Feinstein
floated a “censure resolution” so if was pissed at his action why vote to acquit?
It shows how dispicable the Democrats are
2 Likes
That’s a lie. If it did then he would have proceeded.
It certainly provides the genesis for a congressional inquiry. As mueller said, it’s up to congress as OLC “satandard” prevented him from charging Trump.
Charging him with what? Whats the charge?
Mueller stated at least three times that the OLC opinion had nothing to do with his failure to charge Trump. You are lying…again.
It was a negative for Republicans when they impeached and failed to convict Clinton.
Clinton’s approval ratings shot up about 20 points.
1 Like