If Trump wins, we need to outlaw Marxism/Communism/Socialism, and a hundred other bad things

From what I saw in Stockton and other places in the US, I got the impression that the management is totally ignorant of and uninterested in the situation on the production floor.

Racial tension, no matter how subtle, is always there even in California. Chinese women learned the sewing skill on the industrial sewing machines fast and others knew it.
The management knew they had to hire a certain number of a loud minority to avoid trouble and treat them with utmost care and the engineers from Japan had a hard time understanding it.
This is a case of diversity being extremely detrimental to industrial efficiency and productivity, far from diversity being any strength. (Whoever says that must be smoking something funny)

Diversity for diversity’s sake is unproductive in any way, and large corporations, -like govts, try to make rules to cover every possible contingency. What they do accomplish is making too many rigid rules that box-in everyone up and down the food chain. It precludes flexibility; insures that troublemakers can keep the pot boiling; keeps everyone on edge and afraid of stepping on toes. My first job after the Army had the first steps in men & women equality rules in the making, so I’ve been subjected to the entire process that got us here except for the last 15 years as retired. It’s always been us-versus-them in my experiences; -pick a side. Young men avoid women now, as I would if I was young now. One lament you don’t hear anymore? “…If I was young again…” If you’re old, you don’t envy youth. Don’t admire them, either. Don’t offer much unsolicited advice, either. Keep your head down and out of the line of fire. Online and anonymous is a useful outlet!

One of my favorite Dr. Thomas Sowell quotes:


Yet large organizations mandate it and make all the rules to force (enforce) its embrace by everyone, even, -maybe especially those being run over by the rules. And the proof is never in the pudding.

:roll_eyes:

1 Like

Paul Harvey had a Rest of the Story in which he told of an old, quaint graveyard in the middle of a golf course somewhere and the builder of the graveyard jealously precluded Republicans.

There are two personality types; they gravitate towards the two ends of the political spectrum, Dems & Repubs. You won’t see intellectual investigation into this kind of thinking from academia because it would be revealing in an unpleasant way, but we all know it in our hearts. Dems are jealous and anal-retentive, think dark thoughts much more than us, and do so an inordinate % of their time. We on the Right are happy for others who possess desirable things or ideas, memories, goals, gifts, position, grades, -anything that is worthy to have ourselves, or not. We’d like have all the same talents, luck, strength, good looks, just plain goods, too! I’d like a Cadillac, please! I’m the good-looking guy on the red chair on the right side of the room. The difference is we see what we like and start working to get it, or if not, just admire it as is, where is, anyway. The difference is we generally do not covet other peoples stuff. We might agree that the person who has “it” shouldn’t; might even agree that they shouldn’t and we should, but we still do that within the bounds of righteousness. I am not free to take what belongs to others; I am free to earn my own. If someone else has something they shouldn’t, then there are laws and rules and proper ways to right the wrongs involved, all having nothing to do with my “opinion”. It is not proper for me to say what someone has the right to have. The laws and mores of the society we live in dictate that for all. The Rule and Spirit of Law is what right-wingers live by.

The Left lives by a different set of personal values & guidelines. They decide; you abide. Or else. The Rule of Law is the principle guide, but if need be, the exact means sometimes has to be made helpful if the goal is worthy. Sometimes, the ends DO justify the means. Often, debate can’t settle an issue, in which case push needs to be increased to shove. Some ideas are beyond the stick-in-the-mud people, and when an issue becomes too important to await conversation of the masses, or at least the majority, you do what you have to do to advance the idea.

The Left doesn’t want to see this in black & white. They see themselves as thinking properly and all others wanting, just Deplorables, or Clinging to guns & bibles, but never, ever better than clever. Squirrels & pigs can be clever, but they can’t vote, yet. We view the world as right track/wrong track, and mostly correctable. But, we’d rather not spend our time thinking about anything to do with govt.

1 Like

Absolutely. And it is quite puzzling and annoying. I tried to live with it for a long time.

A friend told me a few years ago that, unless I support Biden/Dems and take covid measures (getting jabbed, voluntarily locking down, wearing masks, etc) seriously, he no longer wanted to be my friend. Interesting that neither of us are Americans and we don’t live in the same country. We meet only once in a few years.

As for covid, we live thousands of miles apart and we chat only on skype, so there’s zero chance of infecting each other. And his visceral hatred of Trump is shared by many, and I sort of understand his anti-elitism.

The left take politics seriously and believe politicis should govern our daily lives, even friendship. What does it tell you?

It is a religion. Either you are with us or against us.

1 Like

Two Types, continued, so to speak.

Real intellectual progress stopped with the universities’ universally rotten handling of so-called anti-war protests of the 60s. Co-incident in those times were the race riots in big cities which were also handled badly. In both cases they happened, they exhausted themselves, and eventually ended. Big city Mayors and college Presidents are not elected or appointed based upon their skills to handle volatile situations, or unruly citizens. They are at the top of their respective food chains as administrators of lackeys. There is no list of qualifications for both position that doesn’t begin and end with, 1.) Skillful fund raiser. 1.a.) Can smile at camera or moneyed supporters on command. 1.b.) (Optional) Has no egregious criminal history, to speak of. There is nothing else that is mandatory, even if #1 can be said to be mandatory. So often they bring no skills to the table. Can we be surprised that they have no other skills?

Did you watch the highfalutin university Presidents quizzed by Rep. Elise Stephanik who couldn’t seem to discriminate between abusive and non-abusive behavior of students and activists who had seized parts of their campuses? When asked if chanting, “Death to the Jews” was outside of permitted protest policy they hemmed and hawed and tried to sound intelligent in spite of themselves. But, alas and alack, they stumbled thru brain fart after brain fart, totally un-self-aware while at the same time totally confident that they were speaking within the attorney-advised safe envelope. Stay above the fray; Say nothing that they can pin you down on; Be neutral; Volunteer nothing; Just answer as simply and briefly as possible without being abrupt. Smile aimlessly.

“What color is the sky? “I’m not sure I haven’t looked directly at it recently, but it’s usually blue with white clouds, or darker clouds if rain is imminent, but I haven’t heard a weather report so I couldn’t really say. I’ll look before tomorrow’s testimony and let you have a more complete answer then.

I don’t mean to let the Mayors off the hook. They’re the guys holding back the only people in their employ who know how to handle rowdy crowds of people and move in before it gets out of hand, -the police, “Give the protesters time to have their say; I’ll let you know when to move in….” Looking back over 60 years of protests that have turned ugly, has it ever been different? Has the Mayor’s office ever announced, “Chief James Craig has our full support to keep law & order in the streets and arrest immediately any troublemakers from outside the city, who will be jailed and we intend to throw the book at protesters who come to Detroit to ruin our city”.

As a matter of fact Detroit was a quiet as a church service thru all the BLM riot years, except for one incident. The cops chased down the bad guys and threw them in jail, and all was quiet & peaceful after that. My kind of Mayor; my kind of Chief; my kind of law & order.

Will they be publishing guidelines for qualifications for Mayor or college Presidents soon? Ever? Ask for nothing; get nothing.

So, back to no intellectual progress in universities since the 60s: There was a social researcher in eastern Canada, maybe Montreal who came up with some stats on the IQs of blacks in the 70s, which he said was low and falling. They didn’t need to read any further than that to get out the rope and pick a tree with a strong lower branch. They were going to shut his mouth ASAP, and did. But some of the research leaked out sideways.

Turns out his findings were fully supported by the numbers and the reasons for the decline were kind of bulletproof, too. That was simply that Aid to Dependent Children beginning in the late 50s/early 60s was generous enough to change society. The societal norm of a young girl getting pregnant, forced to give up the baby because she couldn’t support the baby and going on with life, sadder, but wiser had been changed, forever. Now, any girl of any age could choose to keep the baby and Social Services would pay medical expenses, for an apartment, for food, clothing, etc., etc., all the expenses necessary for the girl to keep the baby. No need to fight with Mom & Dad; tell them to stuff it, quit school, and move out to your own place!! Be an adult! After all, you can have more adultery without Mom & Pop looking over your shoulder…

So, the obvious result? Have as many addition children out of wed lock as suits, and life in the care of Big Brother goes on as the payments increase. As the girl children of the first child Mom gets to that discovery age, guess what happens? How about the boys? The first boy has no income at his age, whatever that is, even if she names him, and no more forced marriages, so he gets off free as a bird. Begin the spiral of Children with no education having children having children having children. No fathers in the home because the payments would disappear. Girls, now older but not wiser having babies by several different fathers. So children without fathers having children without fathers, on and on and on. You can pack 3 generation into 40 years, and what have you? Dumb kids having kids but not educating dumb kids, the situation being especially aggravated by inner city schools with low standards and poor discipline. Such school systems being packed with fatherless children raised by a generational succession of welfare mothers. If you test these kids, as kids, thence adults; what would you expect to see in the stats? Yeah, predictable.

But damn the torpedoes; full speed ahead and shoot the messenger. In an era of Blacks pointing out every instance of racial inequity, no one wanted to broadcast this message. Cry racism loud & long. So, the Canadian research got buried. It was too embarrassing for the white liberals who instituted the mess; too embarrassing for the Black establishment, I guess, too much to handle by the supposed intelligentsia running higher education, and the govts wanted no part of calling blacks dumb and getting dumber, so nada. Hide it and stop talking about it. Good thing the fire department has a different understanding of their duty. They find an egregious violation and they fine you enough to make it right; and not do that again.

Have welfare agencies changed? Yes, they are an equal opportunity agency now and include as many white girls as fall by the wayside. So every race is getting dumber. Look around you; see the evidence? University students who can’t tell the difference between murderers and freedom fighters?

Sad. Looking back over a long lifetime, I have had many close friends that right now I have no idea what their politics were.

I hear you. Most of my friends are/were oblivious to politics. Some don’t/never vote. I don’t understand that mentality, but… they are still my friends.

1 Like

Most likely they don’t belong to the left. Or too disgusted with the “capitalist” system.

Same here. People change. Their personalities may not change, but their views do.

I was surrounded by peers who leaned toward the left. But where are they now?

2 Likes

The jungle has its own laws. Not written, but respected.

Fools speak out their intentions. Smart ones keep their intentions to themselves.

Joos are smart. Maimonides, a Jooish philosopher from medieval Spain said: “one who murders a Jew is subject to the death penalty, one who murders a non-Joo is not”
Rabbi Yoel Sirkis: “indirectly causing the death of a non-Jew is no sin at all”

According to the Talmud, “Gentiles are neither to be lifted [out of a well] nor hauled down [into it]” (Tractate Avodah Zarah* , 26b). Maimonides writes: “As for Gentiles with whom we are not at war…their death must not be caused, but it is forbidden to save them if they are at the point of death; if, for example, one of them is seen falling into the sea, he should not be rescued, for it is written: ‘neither shalt thou stand against the blood of thy fellow’–but [a Gentile] is not thy fellow” (Mishneh Torah , Laws of Murder 4:11).*
Israel and Anti-Gentile Traditions | My Jewish Learning

Honestly, I’m tired of these people.

To each his or her own.

You are attributing ideas from eons ago to today’s Jews that may or may not be held by today’s Jews. There are bad things mumbled by white supremacists, et al that are rejected entirely by other “white” people. The same can be said for every group on the planet. You are giving generalizations a bad name.

1 Like

This is straight from wikipedia, edited (or rather controlled by Joos).

Legacy[edit]

At first, the values of the Pharisees developed through their sectarian debates with the Sadducees; then they developed through internal, non-sectarian debates over the law as an adaptation to life without the Temple, and life in exile, and eventually, to a more limited degree, life in conflict with Christianity.[47] These shifts mark the transformation of Pharisaic to Rabbinic Judaism.

Today’s Judaims has not changed in essence from the time of Jesus. A rabbi told me, today’s Judaism is Pharisee.
What did Jesus say to them?

Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it. (Jonm 8:44)

I’m guessing we’ve all been watching the news tonight with Trump convicted on all 34 counts. It’s a dark day for America, and I won’t be surprised if the less patient among us react poorly. Miami will be cheering because moneyed investors will be quietly slinking out of a very dangerous town and motoring due south to a city full of Latinos, but not crime. I expect the Stock Exchange to migrate to safer ground and the brokers will scatter to the winds because you can make electronic transactions from anywhere on the planet that suits your soul and smaller offices with locals selling to locals makes good business sense. No reason to have a thousand brokerage agents in one big city anymore! What’s not to like for everyone involved?

Don’t like traffic and subways full of unsavory characters? How about Drag Queen parades; do they offend your sensibilities? Come from a state that looks a lot friendlier now that you’ve seen New York? Like to fish & hunt & hike where you can carry a gun, but don’t need to? Seen enough rude people who live like strangers among strangers and do that at the same time they hate it? Like to see more cops than homeless bums on the streets? Paid enough state & local taxes for a lifetime and yearn for a place with neither? Wanna go back to where everyone has an accent that says, “I’m a hillbilly” or I’m a Texan", I’m an OKie”? Had enough $5 cups of coffee for the rest of your life?

Think of a personal reason or two to flee Big Apple for flyover? The Big Exit is on. Escape from Gotham…

1 Like

It sure is.

I have been wondering about that myself.
Wall Street, City of London, Shanghai perhaps. The characters in question need to get together off and on, I suppose.

Is that too expensive or rather cheap?

In Detroit it would be outrageous. In NYC, who knows?

That would be 49 other States maybe New Mexico comes close at least your women won’t get sucker punched from a random male stranger !

1 Like

Many people don’t understand, however, that the Democrat party has a long history of dishonor and disservice to America while being adept at covering its tracks.
With the control of the big three television networks, the handful of major newspapers in the U.S., National Public Radio, the internet, and other tech giants, and all the other ways in which the Left can manipulate public opinion and create narratives out of whole cloth, who among us has a true and accurate understanding of the Democratic Party?

For example, who murdered Abraham Lincoln? Almost anyone can tell you it was John Wilks Booth, but what is little known is that he was a member of the Know-Nothing group, affiliated with Democrats. Who murdered John F. Kennedy? Lee Harvey Oswald, and whether or not he was a patsy for the CIA, he was a Socialist and in league with Marxists.

Who murdered Martin Luther King? James Earl Ray. Whether acting alone or as a patsy for the FBI, Ray was a Southern segregationist. Hence, all three of these assassins leaned Left, or at the least, had affiliations with Leftist groups.

Stifling the Rights of Others

Who owned slaves throughout the southern U.S.? It was Democrats. Generally speaking, Republicans or those who leaned Right did not own slaves. Who lynched blacks and white abolitionists? It was the Democrats. Some 4,200 people in the U.S. were lynched between the years 1882 and 1968, 3/4 of them black and 1/4 of them white, those who supported the Black Freedom Movement.

2 Likes

Blacks, Joos and yes, some whites did.

Israel did.

Incorrect order …
whites , j* ws , and some blacks . 99.999 all demoRATS !!!

In 1830 there were 3,775 free Black people who owned 12,740 Black slaves.

1860 Census
Total Population 31,183,582
Total No. of Slaves 3,950,528
No. of Families 5,155,608
Total Free Population 27,233,198
Total No. of Slaveholders 393,975
Slaves as a Percent of the Population 13%
1 Like

These stats and the following graphic show something important which is widely overlooked by those who question out history with slavery: A very large portion of our country’s economy was dependent upon slavery, and the entirety of the slave holder’s personal wealth often pivoted upon their labors. Without addressing the importance of continuing the practice of holding slaves economically, you can’t discuss the practice. It would be like repealing the right to unionize would be today: a very large body of people is in favor of unions and telling them they had to give that up while you gave up nothing would be met with violent resistance.
Look at the large part slavery was in the economy of the south; it shows that asking the south to give up slavery and join the other states in breaking free from Britain would be a non-brainer in the south’ Not only No; Hell No. Neither the north nor south was big enough free themselves from Britain without the other as an ally.

colonies

1 Like