If Trump wins, we need to outlaw Marxism/Communism/Socialism, and a hundred other bad things

Not hardly , take a look at those scumbags in DC , then look at the evil CIA , DOJ , FBI , then tell me the number of wars and dirty deeds they had a hand in . :smiling_imp: :imp: :smiling_imp: :imp:

1 Like

Now that it looks like Trump is going to stomp Biden into the dustbin of history, the dirty, no good sons of bitches that have used govt power to circumvent the Rights of the opposition are making noises about “will he promise to hold them harmless for all the breaches of law, trust, and oath they have broken over the last 10 years”? They are backing him into corners during interviews; just one more example of what we all know: no remorse; they know they’re vulnerable because they overstepped their authority and violated the letter and spirit of the law.

Trump says it has to stop somewhere, but I’ll tell you where that is: No remorse means they will keep low profiles until the no good dirty sons of bitches get back into the driver’s seat. To which I say: Cringe, you motherfuckers, because Trump doesn’t have to lift one finger to come and get you; the authorities that know what the law is and what your role was in circumventing exercise of the letter & spirit of the law will come for you when their hands are no longer bound behind their back and you have no crooked bosses running interference for you. We know who you are and where the closets full of skeletons are. Get ready to crawl.

We seen a corrupt FBI , CIA and a DOJ when Trump was president and how all plotted AGAINST him before and during his presidency and that will NOT CHANGE if Trump becomes president again !!!

2 Likes

This will be forever a historical landmark for this period.

What we have after the next Trump Presidency will be as much of a change as that of what followed George Washington. Washington had to win a war with the Brits who were by the standards of the day far better equipped; Trump has to win the Rule of Law back by bringing before the court those who are violators of the law. The Dems will scream and shout characterizations, but it is the courts and law that will convict, or not, in public trials based upon evidence of breaking the law or not. He doesn’t have to lift a finger. There is a trail of broken dreams that can be followed by the injured parties back to the origins of deeds or misdeeds for recompense, and most important: public scrutiny of the proceedings. Let the chips fall where they may.

1 Like

It’s too fucking bad there are far too many RINO’s in the GOP !
Agroup called Republicans for the Rule of Law launched a $2 million ad campaign Friday pushing back on former President Trump’s claim that he has absolute immunity from being prosecuted for his actions surrounding the 2020 presidential election.
These MF’s stood by when the FBI , DNC , and 95% of congress and the senate tried to stop Trump with the Russian BS and all the other crap done to him from 2015 until today .

2 Likes

Wasn’t it nice for them to let us know who they are? They aren’t guaranteed their political office. Someone could run against them and if Trump’s team backs them, then the problems go away.

Problems will NEVER go away for Trump unless we eliminate the FBI , DOJ , CIA , DNC , the anti-Trumpers , the nasty swamp , and the ACLU .

1 Like

…and that is never going to happen. The best we can hope for is a total revamp of all of them.

1 Like

His own mother was a Tory, a staunch supporter of the King.
Today in America, there are too many members of the Fifth Column.

1 Like

And these too.
image
They make up 5% of the US population, and yet how many judges of the Supreme Court and other courts? How many members of the Biden government, Congress, Senate, etc etc

Yes, but we can do that if the swamp’s hand is prevented from putting it’s thumb on the scale.

Breaking all the federal agencies into 50 smaller units, each sized to the state they service, and moving that branch to the state capitol to be supervised and/or a part of the similar State agencies would go a long way to making things right. The State Police do the same thing the FBI does, except dealing with violations of state statutes. Federal agencies that investigate and/or prosecute violations of federal statutes in the given states should live where they work & be answerable to the local citizens. All the federal agencies the same: EPA part of the State Dept of Natural Resources; Commerce part of Secretary of State; Education disbanded as superfluous; Health part of State Health & Welfare; Etc., etc., etc. All those agencies can have headquarters in DC in one of the then empty buildings. A new law regarding the size of the DC headquarters staff to be no larger than 1/50th of the total size of the whole agency. Each state agency branch would be funded by Congress, and be limited to being no larger than the state agency that serves the same enforcement function of state regulations and statutes. To prevent these federal agencies from becoming fiefdoms not answerable to the states, the top 5 positions to be nominated by the President and confirmed by the state legislatures, and removable by same. Hiring of other staff; locally; from residents of the state. Transfers between states only upon approval of both states.

Now, tell me again that we can’t bring these agencies in line with serving the public! The computer age is here where private companies are diminishing the large central headquarters as superfluous, and the govt can do the same.

1 Like

Jews stress education for their children. Surprise, surprise, educated people advance.

That may be but, Jews aren’t the only educated people or the only ones who stress education. They do seem to hold a very large percentage of high positions/power in the world. Kinda makes one :thinking: :thinking: :thinking:.

1 Like

To quote Ezra Pound: Keep Joos from education, so that they will not poison the minds of our children.

From kindergartens to Harvard Yard, the US educational system is poisonous.

This is so true today . They stopped being a place were one is educated to a place were one is indoctrinated .

3 Likes

Let me know when you find a group of people who don’t help each other… :stuck_out_tongue_winking_eye:

Yes, they have their own schools and wouldn’t tolerate ours. Shows who’s smart right there, huh? If you don’t get the first one right, you can’t get them all.

Just look at the current GOP. :rofl:

So we all know the public school systems are infiltrated by the kinds of people you wouldn’t associate with. The only solution is the dissolution of the system and replacing it with one that is answerable to the customers, the people who pay for the product, if they like it, and abandon it if they don’t. We are hemmed in by law to pay for a system that serves us poorly that we have to pay for anyway. “Schools of Choice” is the quickest answer: when there is money in the hands of customers, vendors will appear out of thin air. Some will not be good, but we can quit and take our money elsewhere unlike the exact same condition we find ourselves in right now, so no big deal. The people who cry wolf about that are the people we want to throw out the door; -from places we are forced to pay for. It won’t take long for the space to do the replacement on a grand scale suddenly becomes available on a grand scale: the school districts will have to sell the empty school buildings, and presto! Where will the teachers come from? There are thousands that have withdrawn from the system that would love to return to teaching the way it was envisioned originally and mostly practiced back in the 50s. In private schools trouble makers are identified early and expelled; they can take their dollars and shove ‘em. Schools for troublemakers will also appear out of the blue with staff to handle hard cases and make their lives miserable enough to straighten out most of them. The lost causes wind up in prison, anyway. Who wants their children associating with other children who are of that low character? Forcing some people to do that right now is called public education in big cities with large areas of lower income people. They are doomed only because the public money spent on education is spent by other people for them. If they are to make bad choices; shouldn’t they be making the bad choices? Can we at least limit the size of the bad choices to those of a few people instead of the whole city? We all know that most poor people would love to insist that their children straighten-up or be sent to a school for hard cases, or special school for special skills. Even just a regular school that didn’t ignore their results. The system would be all the good things that it should be:

  1. Regardless of income, every parent would be able to send their kids to an appropriate school, whether that is:
    1a) A regular, hard-case, or specialized for special skills.
    2a) The poor would not be condemned to duplicate themselves.
    3a) Society would be AS A WHOLE upward bound.
    4a) Society would have fewer bad people resulting from bad childhoods.
    5a) Society would be safer with less of all kinds of crime.
    6a) Society would need fewer and smaller prisons.
    7a) Concurrent to an upward mobile society with fewer costs for law
    enforcement would be an increase in self-sufficient tax payers paying more.

What’s not to like? We only need one catalyst for this to ensue: Schools of Choice. Legislate it federally, and presto!

While I believe the fix was in on the Trump verdict, I think the online posting of…"My cousin is on the jury, blah, blah … I think that’s a hoax that is intended to look like a Trumper making trouble. We should stay away from it. Let the govt investigate; The chips will fall where the may, anyway.