Knew I’d seen it somewhere ty
1 Like
Yep the emperor has no clothes
No you didn’t, neither one of you can produce anything to support the claim.
NATO has been bombing Afghanistan.
Europeans are wondering, what has NATO got to do with a remote country in Central Asia?
Iran has ZERO motive to start a war.
Click if you know German.
There is a big demonstration planned today near an American base in Germany against America’s inhuman and indiscriminate drone attacks against citizens of various countries.
Maybe the dumbasses should read the NATO Charter.
As a result of 9-11 our European NATO allies invoked article 5 and have then been acting since in accordance with their mutual defense obligations.
Defense implies aggression. But nobody’s threatening western Europe after the collapse of the Soviet Union.
Remember the agreement between Gorbachev and Bush 41? Baker was a friend of Bush as well.
NATO was not supposed to expand; Lo and behold, the fake alliance is at the doorsteps of Russia.
1 Like
I do not think that they would necessarily be anticipating that bombing; therefore, I have no reason to suppose that they would disperse their planes and ships.
It is certainly possible to argue that the US has not always acted in a moral fashion.
But the problem comes when some–and it is usually (though not always) liberals–attempt to compare the US with some theoretical standard of perfection.
A much more reasonable comparison, I believe, would be with other great powers–of either the past or the present.
And can you think of any–even one–that has acted in a manner more moral or ethical than the US has acted?
S-400 is for defensive purposes.
If Iranians haven’t requested the missiles yet, it means they are confident as of now, that they can inflict enough damage to aggressors (Read Israel’s proxies, US and Saudi) so that they will think twice.
The NATO charter is not specific to aggression by Russians in Europe.
The US was attacked, our allies acted under their obligations laid out in the NATO charter.
1 Like
Each of which will be tracked to their new parking places and targeted should they be sent to Iran.
1 Like
3 Likes
Does not change the fact that acts of a sovereign nation do not require UN approval. A nation might not like the consequences of their unilateral actions but they can indeed choose that path anyhow.
1 Like
I’m wondering if a low altitude tomahawk cruise missile can be detected, tracked, and targeted by an S-400 system. Maybe we simply have to overwhelm them with numbers or maybe use some type of ballistic missile to take them out.
1 Like
As I understand it the latest generation can fly well below most radars. The trouble is that they are very slow and AA batteries can easily take them out.
This is why our first waves of attack will be specifically targeting the AA and radar units.
At the same time we’ll have stealth bombers and FB’s targeting their airfields and any planes that get airborne.
Once we have control of the skies the rest is pretty simple.
1 Like
Iran will NOT benefit from a war with the US and Saudi Arabia, two proxies of Israel.
Iran is capable of inflicting enough damage to make sure they will not start a war readily.
Iran is already benefitting, the Euro’s are scrambling to to keep the US from retaliating and attempting to salvage some sort of semblance of the nuclear agreement along with pushing the US to ease sanctions.
They are getting out of this exactly what they wanted.
1 Like
If Iran is benefiting from the constant threat and blackmail from Israel and its proxies, I would say it’s divine justice.
Down with Khazar ■■■■ and their shabbos goys.
You and your terrorist friends and Nazis are going to be terribly disappointed with the outcome.