Let’s hope that the USSC take another look at the Pennsylvania Mail In ballot thing where your side with your Leftist Activist Judges have said that ballots that have no signature or no matching signature have to be counted. A so-called law that Leftist Activist Judges made up on the spot to help your side attempt to steal the election.
How else can anyone explain why Mail In Ballots with no signature or no matching signature should be counted, you don’t even know who those ballots belong to, they might even belong to people who died decades ago but have been filled in by someone wanting to rig the vote etc
Or in the case of the ACA his ruling was correct, the mandate was a tax even though they called it a fee.
You and I may not like it but he followed the constitution.
I don’t see him compromised and I don’t think he view Trump or anyone else in his decisions, he looks at the case/evidence as it applies to the constitution.
Roberts is just a window dressing, totally compromised.
Consider this:
Ginsburg, Breyer, Kagan (who are ■■■■■■ )
Scalia (crypto-■■■■ according to Pastor Texe Marrs)
Before Scalia was mysteriously taken out, 5 out of 9 could pass a critical decision detrimental to the US to benefit one minority who is only 2% of the US population.
Call her Barrett. Don’t dignify her with an appellation that AOC and RBG earned. She is another RW hack job that rethugs are trying to gussy up as the next great thing, when in reality, she is their equivalent of a death star in the making.
And JB needs to jettison his commission to study the courts and simply agree to pass whatever legislation Dems can come up with to modernize the Federal Courts. 1. Its constitutional. 2. Waiting until Barrett rules on a few cases will make it seem even more political.
Judges and Justices should have long but limited terms, staggered so that an equal number come up for renewal each year. And they need to be filled when they come due - McConnell set the stage for this judicial bloodbath by refusing to confirm Obama’s judges.
