A New Trump Executive Order May Make More Health Care Prices Public

So when someone gets in a car accident, will the EMTs provide a menu of services offered? What if the person isn’t conscious and can’t choose from the menu?

That problem wouldn’t exist if we went to patient based care. Since we both agree that is a problem why not come up with a solution that covers everyone? Doesn’t that seem more practical?

I think it was Martin Luther King who said 'socialism for the wealthy and rugged individualism for the poor" - unless you are one of the global elites you are arguing against your own interests.

Well people here already provided ample content to your question, you just don’t like the answer!

Let’s try this another way shall we?

Do you like whales and Wolves?

1 Like

That is not the point of making prices public.

If you cannot afford treatment for your child then you should be able to qualify for medicaid.

If you don’t qualify, then you are one of the “rich” that is going to be soaked to pay for someone else… even if you don’t see yourself as being “rich”.

1 Like

If I’m not mistaken I believe the threshold for not being eligible for Medicaid is $26,000 per year. That sounds awfully rich to me.

Would you rather people just not work instead?

1 Like

Ah, bc an person in a car accident somehow recovers stupider than he is before the accident. If price for the surgery is transparent, the hospital charges no more, no less, or gets sued.

And you really think people prioritize choices over immediacy in life-or-death situation?

People do it every single day. Go find a cancer patient without health insurance.

You are really equating a car accident patient to a cancer patient to prove what again? Look up the word “immediacy”, and brush up your resume / training as well if you think $26k a year is “awfully rich” to you. Reading comprehension and a working vocabulary help.

You Trump supporters are just not getting it.

This EO means absolutely nothing. The price differentials between providers don’t really mean a damn thing to patients; you either have insurance or you don’t (and therefore can’t afford treatment period)

3 Likes

She should learn to code.

1 Like

That I could agree with you on…

1 Like

The logic of free enterprise, supply and demand has gone to the typical emotional/histrionic based crutch, grasping at straw, last resort:

And, so it comes full circle that critical thinking and merit based arguments to actually solve problems simply cannot be made with liberals.

To be fair the car accident victim has a slight edge because automobile insurance will cover their injuries whereas the cancer patient doesn’t have insurance so the price is irrelevant.

I don’t think that $26,000 a year is a lot of money. I was facetiously replying to @DMK. Try not to take things so literally.

2 Likes

Nice way to twist and contort a tongue in cheek response.

Now try explaining to me how this executive order is going to lower the cost of healthcare.

2 Likes

When does the average person look up medical facilities for prices before getting sick? And what do you ask for anyway? “How much is the doctor’s price?” “What is the cost of the onsite aspirin”, etc… ?

Who calls different pharmacies to compare prescription prices!?

This is a useless executive order!

1 Like

Hmmm?

Wouldn’t allowing state and federal government agencies (Medicare, Medicaid, etc) to negotiate pricing as Canada does be more effective?

If it’s really cost reductions and not profit increases they seek that would be a good place to start.

Don’t be silly. Clearly, making prices public is about being able to gather information and make informed decisions.

Now, if you’d like to choose not to be insured and suffer a catastrophic injury, well that decision is yours to make, it is not? You’ll still be treated. Can you site any instance of an EMT rifling through your belongings and if not finding an insurance card leaving you to rot in your car?

Care is patient based. No one is turned away for treatment in an ER. However, if not in an ER would you not like to know that you could save thousands by shopping prices?

Actually, it is the interests of people like “you” I argue FOR. I am not a globalist elite. I am an individualist and I strongly believe in people, not government to make the best decisions on their health. I also believe in personal responsibility, family to help and community to help. Not an uncaring, impersonal government.

1 Like

The reason why you are able to do that is because up front medical pricing was already a part of the Affordable Care Act.

Trump did nothing here.

Yes - when a loved one gets sick let’s burden our families with multi-generational healthcare debt loads instead of tasking our government and our civil servants to negotiate prices directly with the healthcare and drug companies.

Darling? At 26 K per year you are making $12.50 per hour on a 40 hour work week. If that is all you can muster for yourself then I’d suggest you get yourself your own business.

My maid just bought a brand new house, nicer than mine, but she’s worked her ass off for it and my hat is off to her.

Grow the hell up. No one owes you a damn thing and you sure as hell are not going to rob people like me or my maid, both of of us who work our asses off so you can “not have to worry”.

Well, there is a nice broad brush. You either can or cannot afford treatment. No inbetween.

How about, you gamble and not buy insurance only to find out you needed it.

How about, you buy insurance and have enough money set aside for the deductible if you need it? Oh, gosh. Even worse. You invest the money for the deductible so that it grows and can also cover the co-pays?

Oh dear…now we have personal responsibility in play…Can’t have that can we?