Why do I doubt the veracity of that declaration? 
Thatâs what, the 11th time now youâve declared you were done with the thread?
Did you give even any superficial thought to what you said? Basically it was that kids are killed by other means, so what difference does it make if theyâre shot to death as well? Iâm surprised you didnât add 'And they should think themselves lucky that their death was faster than those other means. Do you really not understand how fucking moronic that is? Well I donât engage with morons, I get depressed by your nonsensical posts so, so Iâm done here.
You really donât want to hear any more do you because every word I post destroys your preposterous theorizing. So my work here is done!
Would you be happier if instead of guns the mass killers choose explosives, incendiaries, or large vehicles?
With a gun I can stop a perp attempting a mass killing with any of the three or if they choose to use a gun.
Youâre not going to stop evil or crazy people from committing murders by banning guns but you can stop them with a gun.
So thatâs what, your 13th claim to be done here? The only thing youâve destroyed is whatever small amount of credibility you might have had when you first logged on here.
Think about it like this: if I didnât want anyone to comment on my posts, Iâd be intelligent enough to stop provoking them into it. Now for christ sake go and find some guns to play with (you know you want to? 
) and stop trolling me!
Nobody is trolling you and nobody is forcing you to make one stupid post after another demonstrating your lack of knowledge and closed mind.
Are you too dumb to realise that I could say those exact words to you and the message is precisely the same? Let me try one more time; if you donât want to read my opinions then stop fucking asking for them?? Jesus wept!
You failed to answer the question, care to try again?
Would you be happier if instead of guns the mass killers choose explosives, incendiaries, or large vehicles?
Or perhaps youâd like to give it your best effort to challenge me on the facts?
With a gun I can stop a perp attempting a mass killing with any of the three or if they choose to use a gun.
Youâre not going to stop evil or crazy people from committing murders by banning guns but you can stop them with a gun.
Now youâve started going around in circles again, because youâre either ignoring my promulgations that the whole object of the exercise is to eliminate all guns (and how many times have I said that it isnât possible?) so no comment there: or youâre so obsessively self-indulgent - selfish? - about ownership that you simply canât contemplate a country without them. Just forget it now ffs, because Iâm tired of arguing against your and Sammâs ridiculous counter-arguments.
How about trying your best to actually answer the question and/or challenge me on the facts?
Jesus wept as he entered Jerusalem before his trial and death, anticipating the destruction of the Temple.
Are you lazy or just trolling ?
You are here to discuss what is on your mind but refuse to open your mind to anything but your socialist dogma .
Guns are bad all legal gun owners are potential mass killers and should be disarmed .
In your own words you know nothing about fire arms and donât want to learn or understand there place and function in America today .
How in Gods name can you continue your thoughtless socialist dribble ?
I understand how moronic that little diatribe was. Does that count?
Whatâs that now? The twelfth or the thirteenth time you promised to leave this thread? 
Itâs tough to find facts to support feelings. 
2 Likes
This was pretty hilarious to read and watching you do mental gymnastics in your silly cunter arguments! Thanks this made me laugh today!
Kindly donât preach (note that word, because Iâm smart enough know where youâre coming from) to me about âwhat Iâm here forâ. Youâre not interested in guns or the subject matter, youâre just mitigating your small-minded annoyance at my use of an atheistic expletive.
And yet you still keep coming back for more? How fucking dumb is that? Let me try and give you an object lesson here: If someone (like me) makes it clear to someone (like you) that they want to discontinue a discussion because thereâs no more mileage in it, I unfailingly oblige them by discontinuing it, in the presumption theyâre no longer interested in what I say. But in the context, where I would respect your wish and just ignore you, you keep popping up to remind me that I still havenât left the thread. I mean I wouldnât mind so much if what you write was worth reading! Thatâll be the day! 
Are you talking to yourself now? I never said I was done posting here, that was you. 
1 Like
In which case you posted to me in the full knowledge that you wouldnât get a reply? My trouble, and I accept it with alacrity, is that just as in real life, I feel the obligation to answer someone who asks for my opinion. Iâd better stop there or youâll be giving me the latest count? lol