Fine. See my other posts. It actually does work on a small, heavily guarded space
Nothing you’ve stated makes sense even remotely.
Explain how it’s easier to guard and secure a border without effective barriers than one with them.
I’m still waiting for an answer to this. Where is this imaginary 1.9Bn Acres anyone is talking about putting a fence or other barriers around?
Where is this 1.9Bn Acres that anyone is proposing we build a wall around?
Again, attacking my intelligence, or perhaps my motives. I’m getting used to it, so it’s fine.
If i ever said we shouldn’t have walls or fencing, quote it…
Read my other posts for my response.
I’ve read all your posts on the subject and not once have you even acknowledged that these barriers can be effective.
That may be fair, but why would I? I thought that was obvious.
The question was if it is the best way to spend 8 billion on the southern border.
Do you even read your own posts? Seriously?
Once again.
Where is this imaginary 1.9Bn that anyone is suggesting we need to put a wall around?
Just keep reposting.
That is the aproximate area of the lower 48. I already conceded that that was not a good relevance. Please read my previous posts
No one has proposed putting a wall or fence around the entire US so this must be yet another of your diversions.
If we are ever going to secure the southern border that begins with putting effective barriers everywhere they can be of use.
Thats why i called out my own fallacy
I can be on board with that. I just don’t understand why it’s THE rallying cry when its not even a comprehensive solution. I could support wall funding, coupled with better processing, more patrol, electronic surveillance, more immigration judges, etc.
I really want to know why people get so inflamed about the wall.
Because without effective physical barriers it is impossible to secure the southern border as has been explained to you numerous times.
Without those barriers the rest will accomplish nothing.
Try building a house without walls and see how much luck you have keeping people you don’t want from entering.
Always the animus.
Walls of a house do many things: help to keep heat in, keep the wind and rain out, keep thieves out.
You are a master of false equivalency.
I tire of repeatedly having to explain the same thing over and over.
As for the house analogy, only one of those is relevant.
Try building a house without walls and see how much luck you have keeping people you don’t want from entering.
How much luck do you think you’d have keeping unwanted people out of your house without walls?
You have got to be one of the worst debaters on this site. Please give me something valid to respond to.
Once again you are deflecting when you have worked yourself into corner.
Once again.
How much luck do you think you’d have keeping unwanted people out of your house without walls?
All you are doing is reciting the narrative. If not for the liberal narrative, you are probably not so stupid as to say that a wall does not work.
You want to troll, dude… troll and repeat the liberal narrative. If you are not stupid, you know the narrative is.
I think they know this already and has a plan to deal with these issues, yes?
Lol, it’s terrible news for Democrats, they were salivating at the prospect of a collusion finding.