He neither recommended charges nor impeachment.
You were asked specifically to provide proof as to how this is true and yet you go on here with more word salad that is basically repeating yourself! Epic failure on your part and hilarious! Also I provided a reference to case law as it pertains to the Mueller report because you accused me of not reading the report and again you pivot just like I thought you would by stating it’s irrelevant because you yourself are ignorant of the report Nor have read it and don’t have anything else to support your assertion!
Thanks you just proved my point that you are fraudulently trying to present facts without evidence or adequate explanation without specific reference! Typical leftist that try to assert something that is true when it is not is called relativism in the post modernist definition and you just outed your stupidity and intellectual dishonesty! Great job!
BTW your opinion of me or doubts of me does not matter one iota to me, because I have no reason to make shit up like you do! You were challenged and you failed! Keep on though with your word salad’s because it’s entertaining watching someone make a fool of themselves by exposing their ignorance!
Mueller stated it clearly, it was not his job to recommend impeachment as that’s an issue for Congress, his job given that impeachment is a political process, was to lay out the facts. Mueller is not operating under the same SC regulations as Star was for example.
You were asked if you read the Mueller report and you obfuscated to claiming you had read every word and that you were an internet lawyer…you keep trying to grasp for some attack point but the FACTS and the Mueller Report simply don’t support your “chosen” beliefs. I’d suggest, again, read the Mueller Report and sub in Obama for Trump and you will “see the light”. I will give you the time to grapple with this…
He would have recommend impeachment if there was reasonable doubt.
P.S. In America everyone is innocent until proven guilty, even our president Donald J. Trump.
Mueller made his intentions clear when he hired all democrats to work for him . He loaded the dice fixed the deck the fact they found nothing is a testament to President Trump .
2 Likes
That is funny! Because the only one who is obfuscating here is you! Let’s also add being obtuse as well! Nice pivot from answering a direct question only to give more bullshit word salad nonsensical responses!
You are forgetting one thing! I really don’t care what your opinion of me is!
The reality is no one here really cares or values your opinions on the matter either, as you are just another clown riding around in a car without wheels as you already exposed your phoney rhetoric without a shred of evidence to back up your statements! Keep trying though because it’s hilarious watching you make a fool of yourself which leftist typically do, which is also why they are losing elections! Nice job!
BTW try looking up the definition of “obfuscate” I am pretty sure that accusing me of such that you are using it incorrectly and out of context! Another epic failure on your part! Hilarious!
That’s your opinion in how you framed this…Mueller clearly stated that the DOJ “opinion” not to indict a sitting President was being followed. Hence, him laying out the evidence for 10 instances of criminal obstruction.
If you see an American with a difference political opinion as your enemy then what does this say for you. Think about it…someone is exploiting this mindset to the fullest.
Again, can’t argue the topic or the facts, project and deny. This MO should have been shed in the sandbox.
Full transcript: Mueller testimony before House Judiciary, Intelligence committees
RATCLIFFE:
The special counsel’s job – nowhere does it say that you were to conclusively determine Donald Trump’s innocence, or that the special counsel report should determine whether or not to exonerate him. It not in any of the documents. It’s not in your appointment order. It’s not in the special counsel regulations. It’s not in the OLC opinions. It’s not in the Justice Manual. And it’s not in the Principles of Federal Prosecution. Nowhere do those words appear together because, respectfully – respectfully, Director, it was not the special counsel’s job to conclusively determine Donald Trump’s innocence or to exonerate him. Because the bedrock principle of our justice system is a presumption of innocence. It exists for everyone. Everyone is entitled to it, including sitting presidents. And because there is a presumption of innocence, prosecutors never, ever need to conclusively determine it.
MUELLER:
That’s correct.
"… concerning indicting a sitting president: Mueller clearly said that the DOJ policy was one of three reasons why he did not indict Trump. One of three. Not the only reason. Another one of the three reasons was because there was insufficient evidence of obstruction. Insufficient evidence. Mueller pointed to his report and said his report clearly stated there are several items of concern, but insufficient evidence to clearly make the case for obstruction about any one of them. He went on to say that Section 2 of his 448 page report could be interpreted as elements of obstruction, but that it is not clear that Trump broke any laws. He left that determination up to the attorney general, Barr.
Trump has the authority as president to do many of those items (i.e. Trump had the authority to fire Comey, to discuss his opinions about Flynn, to have private meetings with Comey, etc.). Trump was publicly open about his actions. Obstruction is not present when the authority is there and the actions are open. Therefore, this is a political decision about impeachment that Congress would have to make. Mueller refused to make a judgment about impeachment or not. But how are Democrats and the media now presenting this?" - Michael Master
Published WND July 28, 2019 at 7:14pm
1 Like
Honestly. When Trump either loses or has served his term limits, we will go back to fighting for what is Constitutional and the legal challenges will begin with the socialist agenda.
The country has survived many challenges and will continue to do so.
2 Likes
And yet you were the one to speak of enemy’s not me ? The deep state , the MSM , and socialism are all enemy’s of America not our fellow Americans .
You can indict a sitting president you cannot prosecute a sitting president and that’s what the DOJ directive states.
Obstruction of an investigation that found nothing.
A new definition of obstruction.
Yeah, you wouldn’t want Tulsi Gabbard going up against him…
The link is an OP-ED btw…I guess Trump is King per his supporters then given that his Admin is defacto arguing to the courts and against Congress that the Constitution & Rule of Law does not apply to him.
1 Like
1 Like