Here we go with the UN inspectors nonsense. Sound familiar?
I wondering if this was her undoing revealing that it was the UK with the aid of the US that sabotaged the Nordstream pipeline?
@Dr_Manhattan
No surprise if the Brits were involved in the Nord stream, Crimea bridge and now Sevastopol drone attacks.
Pastor Texe Marrs had the intel years ago that a submarine of the British Navy blew up the off-shore rig which devastated the coast along the Gulf of Mexico.
Everything you wanted to know about US hegemony and the arrogance of the ruling elite!
Whatâs Russiaâs next move?
1 Like
âFor by wise counsel thou shalt make thy war: and in multitude of counselors there is safety.â ~ Proverbs 24:6 KJV
Nikolai Patrushev secretary of the Security Council of Russia-"Obviously, the main beneficiary of these terrorist attacks [on the Nord Stream] is the US.Liz Truss immediately reports to Anthony Blinken after the gas pipelines were blown up that âeverything is done.â
Article written by MacGreggor
A new video with a Lancet, which is surprisingly in good quality. Demilitarization of NATO FH-70 155 mm Towed Howitzer
Theyâve definitely softened us up for almost a year for that. Even the people I know who swallow that stuff readily are sad for Ukraine but not enough to do more than send money. Maybe the people directing the meddling donât care?
When Biden got that guy fired back in the Obama days, I thought that was strange - do we go around the world getting people fired? Why donât we do it in Honduras, weâre sending money down a rathole there, too.
Now itâs a little more clear - weâve been meddling in Ukraine for a long time, and telling Putin to choke on it. Why? I donât know. A country whose GDP was $160 billion, and we send them a third of that this year. Whatâs in it for us? I donât get it. One thing itâs certainly not is standing up for democracy.
It seems that, after the USSR fell and the cold war ended, the cold warriors who were in charge just kept doing what theyâve always done. The political parties lost a lot of their ideological bearings, too. Weâve become a country not wrestling with big issues, but more like a high school electing the most popular senior.
1 Like
I think if you spend a few minutes watching this video it will answer quite a few questions and clarify the perspective on what this is truly about. I have been skeptical of Jerry Sachs and his politics in the past, but what he says in this interview I have to say I am in agreement 100%. Very rarely that happens with a known democrat such as him. That being said, I know first hand having seen with my own eyes (Iraq and the disaster of Paul Bremerâs bone headed decisions leading up to our deployment there that got thousands of our service members killed needlessly, something that I could never forgive him for) the policy decisions that never made any sense when happening in real time, only to figure it out years later, is such experiences that left me in disgust; much like what Sachs felt to which he left his employ based on principles. For that I respect him for.
He is on the money when discussing the situation in Ukraine and why with NATO its been in the plans for quite some time to cut off Russia from the Black Sea. Its also why Russia acted the way they did, they had no choice even when years ago they warned several outlets like the UN, the media, Britain and the United States and other diplomatic channels what their red line was and they werenât bluffing. That if NATO moved further inward towards its borders Russia would have no choice but to go to war to insure their survival. The United States is also now trying to provoke China by selling weapons to Taiwan as well.
Where is the call for diplomacy to quell down the tensions? Several instances already involving Boris Johnson where he could have negotiated a truce but for some reason decided not to we now begin to see why. They are trying to lead us into another wider more dangerous conflict.
Worth the watch
2 Likes
Thanks, that helps make more sense out of this. Another thing thatâs mystified me: why the ridiculous response to obvious questions like: why is NATO even still in existence? Tool of Putin, tool of Putin! They had the exact opposite plan, and wouldnât make it clear to the public. Probably they rightly recognized that most people were like me, lived all our lives in the cold war and wanted to take a break from it. We wouldnât be very accepting of more of it. So it was a string of things with justifications that made no sense. Personally, I knew that WMD was an unbelievable reason for invading Iraq, it would have been stupid to do it even if Saddam had a mountain of them. I was just wondering what the real reason was. It couldnât have been the oil, either, we didnât take any of it (alas).
1 Like
Isnât it ironic that the rise of the Oligarch class of Russia, which saved their economy was a direct result of US foreign policy by refusing to help Russia during their financial crisis in the 1990âs? Now because it wants to maintain its hegemony in the world it deems Russia and China as the new axis of evil that must be contained. When looking at it from Jeffery Sachâs lens, its pretty obvious what they are after.
Brzezinski in 1997 said: Ukraine will be the geographic pivot for Eurasia which in essence was the building of the US âUnipolar worldâ AKA NWO.
1 Like
Col. MacGregor mentioned a certain group in Washington, New York and London who want a war with Russia, and we know who these people are.
Average Europeans, Americans and Canadians donât want a war with Russia, but why do this (unspeakable) group of people want to fight Russia?
Because itâs their religion. Russia today represents Christianity; therefor it must be eliminated.
Boris Yeltsin (his Jooish name Baruch Elia) came to power backed by the money power of this group who formed the âoligarchsâ in Russia and Ukraine by buying up important corporations in the Soviet Union at the expense of everyday people.
Brzezinski hates Russia for a different reason but they all agree. Russia must be broken up and rendered powerless.
It was a necessary evil that saved Russiaâs economy in the 1990âs. They didnât have many options back then. The US snubbed their noses to Russia while helping Mexico and Poland with generous capital, but why did they decide to not help Russia too?
1 Like
That doesnât make much sense, either. If these people are so smart and conniving, why canât they see around the corner after Christianity is eliminated? Christianity is dying anyway. Some time in the future, all of the great European cathedrals will be mosques. The US may have a new capitol in the holy Scientology city of Hollywood.
Not only that, but it seemed to me by 2005 that the best thing to do with the flaming pile of shit that was Iraq was to split it into three countries. They couldnât even do that, whoâs going to figure out the new map in Russia?
Smart and conniving people probably know that the Catholics are no threat. The Catholics, who think the Pope is infallible, are perfectly compatible with the New World Order.