And replace it with what?
And replace it with what system?
Ok great, but you ignored my other question, how does putting the tax payer on the hook for paying fines as you previously suggest going to fix the problem? Shouldnāt the leaders who are fined to be forced to pay out of their pockets?
Thatās just the way it is - for example, in the case of a CEO of a Health Trust or any other social services department which is funded from public funds fucks up, and their outfit is fined, the fine comes from the funding. And as if that isnāt bizarre enough, if the fine is a substantial one, the CEO will complain that his/her department needs more to keep it running or there will have to be redundancies, and guess where those redundancies will come from? You got it in one - the front-line rank and file workers.
Sorry that doesnāt adequately address the problem Nor act as a viable solution to deter such unsavoury or questionable behaviour by elected officials.
Here I will use an analogy that is a real ongoing issue and debate regarding NFL (American Football League) officiating among its fan base.
As the debate is raging on about the NFL officiating as being pretty horrible and is giving credence to their detractors that the games are being fixed due to questionable calls that are having an impact on the outcome of games being played and that the league refuses to address this issue appropriately. One fan suggested the solution to the problem is to fine officials when they make an egregious call that is wrong. The debate on whether that improves officiating or not can be discussed however the idea that such fines imposed will act as a deterrent in order for officials refereeing games to correctly make calls according to the rules, is what the main objective to such proposals. If such fines are covered by their labor Unions and not by the offending parties being fined themselves then what deterrence will it have that they wonāt continue with their controversial decisions and questionable behaviours?
The point is with such analogies the same question can be applied in your premise that you put forth. In other words it will be more of the same results with people returning with the same grievances as before and thus the cycle continues.
Yow, you do use a very narrow brush in the blame game. ā ā ā ā & America.
That is sooo recondite, and I hate team sports so much, that I really donāt want to waste my brain power interpreting your comparator. No offence, but if you canāt reconcile what Iāve said on the subject then thereās no point in prolonging this exchange.
I canāt say how much weight this carries; but Iāve heard it many times: " "I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men. **We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated Governments in the civilized world ā no longer a Government by free opinion, no longer a Government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a Government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men". Woodrow Wilson
No offense but if you allow your own personal biases from seeing the point that I am making then you essentially lost the debate altogether! I pretty much proved and adequately provided a counter argument to which that you refused to acknowledge! Your responses as usual are obtuse and fail to explain with a cogent reasonable argument to answer directly the issue I set forth as being the flaw to your offered solution.
Alright, I concede. I donāt think anyone else would agree with you though, because I put it as simply as I could: if I may say so, youāre the one whoās being āobtuseā here, not me. I guess itās like real life - sometimes we encounter someone with whom there is no meeting of minds?
So what? People can go on and on about how the banking system is this or the banking system is the source of all the worlds problems, but if one is not able to offer a viable solution to replace the current system then all their doing is bloviating their discontent on how the world isnāt fair! Offer a or come up with an alternative solution before complaining otherwise these attempts to bring awareness to something that everyone already knows about on forums is a waste of time and is only a exercise for self consumption so people can feel better about themselves and pat themselves on the back to justify their own internet indulgences. You get the same results as petting a cat!
What the hell are you talking about me being Obtuse? Thats ridiculous! I answered your question with great detail, itās not my fault that you choose to cherry pick the content then claim indifference to it. Again I question your comprehension to details! Please provide a clear example of me being Obtuse and I will be Glad to oblige you in clearing it up!
I know nothing about sport, least of all US sport, so thereās no point in my trying to interpret what you mean. Just let it go ffs - this is a messageboard not a site for dissertations?
You donāt have to know anything about US sports if you actually took the time to have read my response but chose not to! This is another clear example why itās pointless having a honest debate with you. You simply donāt treat the people you converse with, with equal respect to carefully read and consider what they write! I find your interaction a little bit disingenuous and you proven that as I gave you another chance to have an honest discussion! I am done here with you!
Iāve noticed that Iām not the only one who has trouble understanding (some of) your posts so donāt blame it all on me. You say itās an analogy but I honestly canāt see any connection whatsoever with sport and public services.
1 Like
He was totally controlled by the Rothschilds.
His regrets came too late.
He was not only wined and dined by them but also received expensive gifts, for which he became paranoid and totally incapacitated by the fear that he might have to return them. So much so that his Presidency was run by his wife.
1 Like
Yeah nice try at deflecting again! As you did in the previous thread. This clearly shows on your end not mine the last thereof of your reading comprehension skills is seriously lacking. So much for your claim to being a published writer huh?
A central bank which is part of the government, not a central bank run by private bankers.
You certainly are not the only one.
So you advocate for a state run capital system like they have in China then?
Right because that would include you who is also obtuse in their responses! Thanks for clearing that up!