Yes, he did say the Pharisees were hypocrites and their father was Satan.
Today’s Judaism is a developed form of the Pharisaic teachings, whether you like it or not. (And Judaics admit it and are proud)
Keep peddling this bullshit all the way to the gates of hell. Maybe theuy’ll give you an ice cube.
They are for the Pharisees and their shabbos goys.
Dude how’d you post video
I don’t know who this woman is, but she has a point (or two)
Not sure what you mean???..
Who is terrorizing whom?
Magog could you give me primary sources Vladimir Lenin was a ■■■■
How did you post that video? So i can watch in the reply instead of other websites?
Just hit reply and copy/paste the link.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3dCW3qS0-lM
Hit return when you post the link and you should see it appear in the preview window to the right.
1 Like
nice thanks
Texe Marrs said that.
His research is well documented but I’ll look into that as well.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=8Rx9uncbdmc
Every terrorist attack is done by the Mossad/MI5/CIA
1 Like
Saying someone is a “■■■■ even though they are well known atheists, turns “■■■■ into a race.
The idea of a “non-religious ■■■■ would be as incorrect as saying a non-practicing Christian or Buddhist or Hindu, or other religion, are of the religion, of immediate ancestors, or a convert, even though they do not have faith and belief.
Usury prohibitions in the original scripture of most all religions are certainly not followed today, but should be, considering the exploitation.
Blaming “■■■■■ is hypocritical and turns the argument into perceived “Greedy Banker ■■■■ anti-■■■ ideation. rather than see how the original principles of religion were discarded by the “secular society.”
People of every background have been guilty of exploiting the masses.
The Globalists elite hate any real religion that doesn’t put them on top of a hierarchy.
One obvious example is calling George Soreass a "■■■■ " when we know that it’s completely false. It doesn’t matter what race or ancestry,–without faith and practice–even mustard seed size–one cannot call them a person of a given religion. That racial thinking is absurd.
Even more idiotic is the Nazi-style search for ■■■■■■ heritage or partial ■■■■■■ heritage, or the “pure” entirely non-Semitic races, genetically, are “Nazis”. All these idiotic ways of thinking are anachronicsms of the stupidest kinds.
So your saying ■■■■ aren’t a race. If ■■■ isn’t a race then Judaism isn’t a religion.
1 Like
But you believe in bible which says you don’t need practice in the religion. You just need faith.
I don’t give a shit whether ‘‘■■■■■ is a race, religion, ethnicity or ‘‘whatever’’ When I use the term ■■■ it is all encompassing and includes mostly ppl who claim(themselves) that they are ■■■■■■ and some that try to hide/deny the fact that they are ■■■■■■■
1 Like
And here is that huge mistake, that focuses on the wrong thing, and doesn’t correct the right thing.
It invalidates anything you have to say. It is shallow and based in superficial, external views. Following kook writings, is just as extremist and fanatic as any other fanatic opinion. You reap what you sow. Cause and Effect. Karna. Everything repeats.
Find the middle path.
The Guilt is yours and the external hate you preach is just slander of human beings who have the same divine nature inside. Refuting wrong teachings for the sake of all beings, includes refuting yours.
1 Like