According to your own posts you are a 17yo highschooler.
Were you lying then too?
Please explain for us how they were using “photocopies of photocopies” for evidence at the Nuremberg Trials when the first commercial photocopier didn’t even hit the market until 1959?
Why do you Hasbara guys hate the truth so much? - thats a rhetorical q btw.
The ■■■■ And The Concentration Camps: No Evidence Of Genocide
their object, in the tradition of the Red Cross, had been strict political neutrality, and herein lies its great value.
The ICRC successfully applied the 1929 Geneva military convention in order to gain access to civilian internees held in Central and Western Europe by the Germany authorities. By contrast, the ICRC was unable to gain any access to the Soviet Union, which had failed to ratify the Convention. the legitimate circumstances under which ■■■■ were detained in concentration camps, i.e. as enemy aliens.
letters of thanks for which came pouring in from ■■■■■■ internees.
Red Cross Recipients Were ■■■■
The Report states that "As many as 9,000 parcels were packed daily.
"Parcels were sent to Dachau, Buchenwald, Sangerhausen, Sachsenhausen, Oranienburg, Flossenburg, Landsberg-am-Lech, Flöha, Ravensbrück, Hamburg-Neuengamme, Mauthausen, Theresienstadt, Auschwitz, Bergen-Belsen,
.
.
.
.
.
*.American authorities were aware that the real story of the camps was quite different
Dr. Larson performed autopsies at Dachau and some twenty other German camps, examining on some days more than 100 corpses. After his grim work at Dachau, he was questioned for three days by US Army prosecutors. [1]
Dr. Larson’s findings? “What we’ve heard is that six million ■■■■ were exterminated. Part of that is a hoax.” [2] And what part was the hoax? Dr. Larson, who told his biographer that to his knowledge he “was the only forensic pathologist on duty in the entire European Theater” of Allied military operations, [3] confirmed that “never was a case of poison gas uncovered.” [4]