Some god news - good guy four, bad guys zero
2 Likes
4 out of 5 taggedâŚspectacular! 3 down, 1 in surgery, and 1 with his tail between his legs as the coward he is. Way to go Texas!
Watch out @Wazoo2u2 - apparently people are getting upset when we get happy about this sort of thing. Expect the bleeding heart âconservativesâ to drop by for some pearl clutching and couch fainting.
1 Like
Only bad part to this story, is that he didnât kill the other two.
1 Like
Not bad shooting considering the circumstances.
1 Like
Werenât you just crying about people taking joy in this sort of thing in the 
thread?
1 Like
If you canât distinguish the difference between the two scenariosâŚthen I canât or wonât help you.
1 Like
Why donât you explain the difference? In both scenarios people were stealing (or attempting to steal) and karma got dealt. Itâs the way things are supposed to work. Is it because you support the mechanism by which death was delivered in this scenario and not the other?
One was in defense of himself and his home/possibility his family.
Other one wasnât.
Itâs been couple minutes nowâŚhave you figured it out yet?
1 Like
The dehumanization. They shouldnât have been stealing. Karma got them. They are not âTacosâ.
1 Like
Oh sorry for the delay! I was watching some beans get baked. Truly satisfying.
Make sure you add baconâŚlots of bacon.
People fantasize about being the homeowner in this scenario because they either think killing people is something they want to do, or they just need to feel above someone else at least once a day.
Itâs not much different than watching a championship fight, then calling the loser a bitch from the armchair.
1 Like
How does this suit you?
Iâm happy as hell that the homeowner killed three out of four. I wish heâd have killed four out of four.
They were criminals invading a manâs home.
Would I call them âtacosâ and be happy if the homeowner turned a flamethrower on them to kill them then laugh about it? No.
1 Like
Sure, because taking a life seems so easy and justified. Until you take a life no matter how justified it is and have to live with it until the day you die.
There are differences - This was a home invasion and the homeowner absolutely spared his family a real horror show by plugging these semi humans.
The other is a mob of people too stupid to consider that perhaps a geyser of GASOLINE mixing with air might be something to, oh, I dunno, avoid. Poverty or not, they all had five gallon or larger jerry cans to haul off their loot. This is Darwin award stuff, but that site is way too PC to actually list an award for this. By the way, in at least one video, toward the end, you can see a couple men still hauling off jerry cans with gas - right past the cops. Of course burning to death is a horrifying way to go, but liberals never consider how it happened- only that it happened. Conservatives, in general expect people to use their brain at least a wee bit.
There is a similarity between the two: in both cases pre-meditated criminality resulted in both groups getting âburnedâ.
Well being burned alive sure does seem like justice for stealing some gas. I mean most other countries youâd lose a hand, but hey when we punish we go the full nine. Oh wait, we donât actually burn people alive for stealing here, do we? Never mind.
No one (at least on this thread) said that burning alive was a fit punishment for theft- thatâs an inference you chose to make. My point was that even in poverty one might steal food, but gasoline? from a geyser?
It isnât the theft, itâs the unwillingness to make even the most rudimentary judgement about a situation.
So being burned alive isnât justified for stealing, but it is for being stupid. Well thatâs a whole lot better. 
1 Like
They got judged by the laws of physics. They donât take bribes nor do they care what skin color you are, some learn that the hard way.