The Religion of Peace is Attacked in New Zealand

Quite frankly, I’ve read your posts and you do not inspire me to delve into the matter. You rather sound unhinged.

Just like calling everyone “Hasbara Guys”. I have no idea what that is, but I’m pretty sure if I go delving into it, I’ll come away feeling pretty icky.

Stop it, Ish. You know they dominate the DIAMOND market. They carry suitcases full of them everywhere they go :crazy_face:

Why criticize based on religion?

If someone or a group is on board with the green deal, global warming, open borders, etc. then criticize away. Leave a person’s religion out of it.

Yeah about that

1 Like

Cool, could you show one ■■■■■■ group that is pro-border control for nations other than Israel?

Then lump them in with the democrats. Why isolate based on religion.

I’m sure there are plenty of ■■■■■■ people that are pro-border control.

Are we not all Americans?

1 Like

Sure, border control of Israel, not US.

2 Likes

I’m sure there are plenty of ■■■■■■ people that are pro-border control.

Please show the groups advocating this, as there are scores (and well funded scores) demanding open borders. If you are sure the balance is even, please show it. When there is a disparity in group behavior, it makes sense to address this through policy. In the UK most rape gangs are Pakistani muslim, so it would make sense to pay extra attention to that demographic if you wish to end the rape gang problem. It would pay no dividends to monitor local ■■■■■■ groups for rape gang behavior (probably).

I’m not American and neither is Ben Shapiro.

1 Like

As I said, plenty of ■■■■■■ people.

How can I possibly compare people as individuals who do not belong to groups to groups?

Do you have any evidence that people identify as ■■■■■■ foremost or as American foremost?

What has happened in the UK is an absolute abomination. I don’t even know what to say to how awful I feel about how you guys have had these animals thrust upon you.

But would I declare that if you are from Pakistan you are a rapist? No, I would not.

Nor, would I by the same standard say if you are ■■■■■■■ you want open borders.

Zionism is not Judaism

I bet you don’t know that you yourself are ■■■■■■■ Imagine the irony here!

Coincidence? Soros did burn his own people to save himself, so who knows.

And… crickets. Lets blame the ■■■■■■ controlled media for not reporting it and for not taking about this more.

They can’t. Haven’t you notice? They have to blame someone while glorifying the shooter and his manifesto. It’s their white guilt talking! They bitch about it because when it was happening they did nothing about it, but when a guy shoots 40 people they celebrate it and blame it on the ■■■ as a way to cope with their guilt! Pretty pathetic!

1 Like

The killer is a terrorist by all our definitions. The media went berserk when Trump answered their loaded question “do you see a rise in White Nationalism?” Let’s unpack that question

  • if there is a statistical rise in White Nationalism then the correct answer is yes

  • if not, the answer is no.

Trump knows no matter how he answers the media will do whatever it takes to make it sound horrible. If he answered “yes” then the headlines would read “Trump admits rise in White Nationalism, does nothing.”

If he said “yes, and we’ll devote all our resources to wiping it out” then the SPLC would be given free reign to label any group associated with anything right of Nicky Maduro as ‘White Nationalist”- and they would do so with relish.

Perhaps it would be better to examine the mindset of the shooter and those like him.

In the shooter’s mind, White people are at the very least under siege, and at worst, being prepared for extermination. How did he get to such a point?

Pretty much anyone can see that hatred for White people- especially White males, has become fashionable, especially in the news media. This hatred ranges from “White Privilege” and all it’s trappings, to ‘critical race theory’, in which all White people are racist simply because they are… White. But that really will not a violent felon make; you need religiosity to make one that irrational.

There is now, and was before, a religious component to White supremacy. By this I mean a belief system with strict parameters, and rebuke or even destruction of excessive dissent or even apostacy. It is also thus with Islam in most of the world, and it is thus with progressivism/leftism/Marxism.

Ironically, each of these believes that:

“Our side is doing the right thing”

“The ends justify the means”

“The other side is a threat to humanity – and to me”

“To fight the other side, is to be heroic”

“Those on the other side will adopt our side’s beliefs if we overthrow them”

“We are doing right if we silence the other side”

“Those who leave our side are traitors who must be destroyed”

“To disagree with our side, you must be a bad person”

The shooter murdered 49 human beings, including small children. He sees himself as a hero, as did the Norway shooter. A suicide bomber on a bus in Tel Aviv sees him (or her) self as a martyr, the others on the bus are like mannequins to him. The Antifa goonchild who swings a bike lock at another person’s head imagines himself some hero stopping a resurgent Third Reich; Rachel Maddow and Sean Hannity see themselves as heroes helping the world see the horrors the other side represents.

7 Likes

Finally someone making a cogent observation without the bias and racist views! Good on you!

President Obama couldn’t be a two term president without the “Whitey” vote, so racism can’t be as rampant as the idiot media narrative tries to condition the populace with!

Speaking of which, dual citizenship didn’t used to be a thing in America. That is in fact why in the oath taken to get naturalized, immigrants must pledge to give up all allegiances to foreign countries:

“I hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty, of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen; that I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I will bear arms on behalf of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform noncombatant service in the Armed Forces of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform work of national importance under civilian direction when required by the law; and that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; so help me God.”

Straight from the source ladies and gentlemen. Whenever someone brings up the term “melting pot” or talks about dual citizenship, THEY ARE LYING TO YOU. Our Country was not built on that. Never was. People used to come here to become Americans because get this, they actually wanted to be Americans. End of story. What do we get now? An influx of people who have absolutely no love for this country, bleeding its resources, while trying to undo the very fabric of laws that built this nation to begin with.

And when these ingrates break our laws and disrespect our Constitution our response shouldn’t be “Well, we just need to appreciate their culture/views.” It should be “If you can’t follow OUR laws and respect OUR culture, GET THE FUCK OUT!” How many problems in this country could have been avoided following that policy I wonder?

6 Likes

The entire state of Israel

Why criticize based on religion?

If someone or a group is on board with the green deal, global warming, open borders, etc. then criticize away. Leave a person’s religion out of it.

You are not intellectually consistent.