The Religion of Peace is Attacked in New Zealand

So:

  1. ■■■■ disproportionately own and operate the the media
  2. They apparently use this to frame Islamic and White Nationalist terrorism in very different lights (not to mention all the other things)
  3. The purpose of this is, you would have me believe, without purpose. No agenda, no correlation.

I disagree. Looking at the evidence, we see a wide disparity in media responses to terrorism- the goal is clearly to maintain the facade of multiculturalism while the globalist agenda proceeds with as little resistance as possible.

You have to understand that these elites (both ■■■ and gentile) have factored in for this sporadic destruction and death, and are well aware it will get worse, but they are more committed to the great project than to things like good governance or peace for the citizens.

Deny it, I fucking dare you.

2 Likes

It has purpose. You, humping your strawman, will not help your case.
It has purpose. But it’s a leftist agenda…not a ■■■■■■ agenda. Since your bolded part is totally wrong, the rest of your post is meaningless.

While plausible, you do know what you are presenting is a theory right? Just for the record, I do agree with the part of media’s complicity in their bias.

The agenda part is where you would have to have proof, its still a theory, and you could be right, but how would that uphold in a court of law, such as an international tribunal court? Do you have hard evidence? Not saying I disagree with you, just saying that you presenting a hypothesis.

The leftist agenda is little more than judeo-bolshevism, you can’t dodge me with such weak defenses.

https://republicstandard.com/explaining-great-replacement-communism-judaism-globalism/

1 Like

Correlation is not cause and effect.
I’m well aware of the influence that Leftist ■■■■ had in opening up the gates to the Bolsheviks. The animosity they felt from the Tsar might have been a factor there, doncha think?

Ugh. They weren’t opening the gates to the Bolsheviks, they disproportionately WERE the Bolsheviks.

Oh look, per capita again. If you’d read the article I kindly provided for you, you’d know this.

As W.E. Curtis wrote;

“The revolutionary leaders nearly all belong to the ■■■■■■ race, and the most effective revolutionary agency is the ■■■■■■ Bund.”

Half of the members of Lenin’s conference before the October Revolution were ■■■■■ and four of the seven original members of the Politburo were ■■■■■ The ■■■■ were dramatically overrepresented in positions of intelligence gathering, senior roles in the Soviet, interrogators, and many other arms of the state. What’s more, roughly three-quarters of the Cheka were ■■■■■■■ and reports inform us that they were very careful to spare their brethren. Borrowing this vital calculation from Mosaisk.com:

If at the times of the Red Terror members of an ethnic group representing 80% of the population (Russians) were responsible for 30% of the terror, and in turn members of a group representing 1.8% of the population (■■■■■ were responsible for almost 40% of the Terror, then the following relation results:

÷ = 22.2 ÷ 0.375 = 59.26

This means that statistically, the ■■■■ of the Soviet Union bear 59 times as much responsibility for the Red Terror per capita than the Russian population.

The government doesn’t treat us well despite us undermining the nation, lets overthrow the ruler and murder his entire family including children is not a strong card to play in the great game of avoiding being evicted from yet another country.

2 Likes

Look dude…I’m not going to try to teach you statistics here. I am not smart enough to do that. But let me just suggest that you do some self-discovery Iinto that field, with a focus on correlated variables. Then take another look at the statistics you cited after you have pulled out the correlation between education and ■■■■■ education and intelligentsia, intelligentsia and Bolshevism, and tsarist victimization and ■■■■■ I think you will find that your assumed cause and effect statistics are not as strong as you think they are.

What is this shit???

1 Like

A friendly gesture.

Sure - if Allah wills it.

Is this like Swirling Dervish music?

Dam dude, you changed the music! I was listening to that, and I was starting to like it!

Nope, nor are you smart enough to avoid conforming to stereotype

The more I argued with them, the better I came to know their dialectic. First they counted on the stupidity of their adversary, and then, when there was no other way out, they themselves simply played stupid. If all this didn’t help, they pretended not to understand, or, if challenged, they changed the subject in a hurry, quoted platitudes which, if you accepted them, they immediately related to entirely different matters, and then, if again attacked, gave ground and pretended not to know exactly what you were talking about. Whenever you tried to attack one of these apostles, your hand closed on a jelly-like slime which divided up and poured through your fingers, but in the next moment collected again.

1 Like

So you are quoting “mein kampf” now?

It reminds me. I used to go fishing. Catching earthworms the night before taught me to be patient. Shhhh… just wait and listen. And sure enough… look what crawled out of the blackness here.

I don’t care what you think of Mein Kampf, it’s highly accurate. You can’t shame me. You won’t engage with the conversation. You only divide up and pour through fingers, shape-shifting to suit your own ends.

1 Like

What does this have to do with statistics and GPA again? Sorry, but you are making a great leap here such as pivoting!

I’m not talking statistics and GPA.

My point, some time ago, is that the J-Media presents a very different face when the perp is a Muslim.

Despite this being obvious, demonstrably true and incontrovertible by anyone with a grasp on reality, we have subsequently seen what is commonly called a kvetch, and nit-picking over minutae in order to distract from the original point. Typical bagel-flavored tactics, many such cases.

1 Like

2 Likes

See…here again you show a pedestrian acquaintance with the larger world. I love ■■■■■■ bagels but they don’t typically put enough sesame seeds on them. Turkish bagels, on the other hand, AKA simit, are identical but loaded with sesame.
Your causation construct… “bagel is caused by ■■■■ arises from your limited knowledge.

Seriously, dude. You need to eat more fatty fish and blueberries.

Well here is the thing, I did pull up a few facts about the media outlets you posted earlier stating they are all owned by ■■■■■ which is patently incorrect.

NPR is own by a board of trustees and not all of them are ■■■■■
FOX news is owned by Rupert Murdoch who is ■■■■■■
New York Times Used to be owned by the Sulzberger family who used to control the News paper but currently the majority shareholder of the company is a Mexican Billionaire named Carlos Slim, the Sulzbergers only control 13% of the company today.

CBS is owned by Summer Redstone who also happens to be ■■■■■■■ so I give you that.

The rest including CBS

  1. Largest –– NBC, MSNBC, CNBC, and Telemundo are under NBC Universal and owned by Comcast, America’s most hated company.
  2. ABC is owned by The Walt Disney Corporation. They also own ESPN, Marvel, Disney Studios, and A&E networks.
  3. CNN is owned by Turner Broadcasting which is owned by Time Warner. They also own HBO and Warner Brothers.
  4. Fox News is under 21st Century Fox (renamed from News Corp) and controlled by Rupert Murdoch. They also own Sky News and National Geographic Partners.
  5. CBS is owned by the CBS Corporation but the majority control is owned by National Amusements under owner billionaire Sumner Redstone. Previously, CBS was known as Viacom. Viacom still exists, but it’s a whole ‘another thing.

The point is, making sweeping allegations such all media is owned and controlled by ■■■■ is simply not true. What I might be inclined to think that they are heavily represented in the industry, but to say they control everything is a bit of a stretch and another conspiracy theory that can’t be proven.

1 Like