The fact that you believe that “there is a lot of validity in Magog’s claims” regarding the 9/11 incident tells me that you are ignorant about the physics and engineering aspects of the event. Ignorance of such things is not abnormal in a large percent of the population so suggesting that you are ignorant is neither an insult nor disrespectful. But calling someone a dickhead, most certainly is.
He can explore the possibilities of what the source of that smoke is, and not jump to the conclusion that it was caused by explosives. This is a perfect example of the application of Occam’s Razor … which is more likely to be the cause … an intricate and logistically impossible scenario or simple physics?
Sorry Stu, let me try again.
Most MPs develop a superior attitude towards the public, the further up the authority ladder they progress the worse the superiority complex.
Of those a number are lacking in intelligent thought processes, viz. Neil Hamilton who was taking brown paper envelopes in return for raising questions in the House (allegedly). They lack the intelligence to see the damage they are doing to election and government process.
Those with a greater intellect aspire to the New World Order, which is basically anybody who makes it to the top of the tree (such as Macron) and some powerful business and money manipulators such as the Bush family, the Bin Laden family, the Rothschilds and so it goes on.
You can see the same things in some of the American political showmen, was it Newt Gingrich who was stalling the proceedings in the prolonged government shut-down under Obama? The posturing senators and congressmen were doing nothing to resolve problems, they were just taking the opportunity for show-boating and nearly caused a worldwide financial catastrophe.
If he believes that it was blown up by MOSSAD what is your problem ? In the same way you don’t accept his version of events he has the right to not accept yours. You accept the official narrative and he doesn’t just live with it. Would you respect him more if he just tried to fit in and agree with you just for the sake of it ? You and others think he is a deluded fool and he in turn thinks the same, continually locking horns won’t change that.
I understood mate I just didn’t get the connection to me replying to Docs vid by saying bring on a depression, that will show them kind of thing…
I do know what you mean, for some it’s the grab it while ya can cash mercenary type and the long haul power seekers, equally destructive in their pursuits.
Except my version is supported by facts (not simply the "official narrative,) his is not. He even went so far as to claim that Mossad warned ■■■■ that worked in the building and so, no ■■■■ were killed in the attack. Which of course was demonstratively false.
What would make me respect him would be if he would make honest arguments regardless whether I agreed with him or not. As I said before, ignorance is forgivable, deliberate ignorance (and deliberate outright falsehoods) is not. Letting it stand does a disservice to everyone else who is merely ignorant and is thus vulnerable to believe the tripe.