The Rabbit Hole

The fact that you believe that “there is a lot of validity in Magog’s claims” regarding the 9/11 incident tells me that you are ignorant about the physics and engineering aspects of the event. Ignorance of such things is not abnormal in a large percent of the population so suggesting that you are ignorant is neither an insult nor disrespectful. But calling someone a dickhead, most certainly is.

Or were you joking about that too? :stuck_out_tongue:

He can explore the possibilities of what the source of that smoke is, and not jump to the conclusion that it was caused by explosives. This is a perfect example of the application of Occam’s Razor … which is more likely to be the cause … an intricate and logistically impossible scenario or simple physics?

Approximately 200,000 with roughly half at each site and of those three quarters died within the first hour, or maybe even the first minute.

To the contrary, I believe he/she is highly intelligent. Which makes his/her arguments even more pathetic. They should know better.

…and therein lie the seeds of a whole other conspiracy theory!

1 Like

That myth was disproven, yet you continue to perpetuate it.

Then why did you object so vehemently when I referred to you as such?

Refuted … by reputable, independent sources. It is virtually impossible to disprove something that did not happen.

1 Like

Sorry Stu, let me try again.
Most MPs develop a superior attitude towards the public, the further up the authority ladder they progress the worse the superiority complex.

Of those a number are lacking in intelligent thought processes, viz. Neil Hamilton who was taking brown paper envelopes in return for raising questions in the House (allegedly). They lack the intelligence to see the damage they are doing to election and government process.

Those with a greater intellect aspire to the New World Order, which is basically anybody who makes it to the top of the tree (such as Macron) and some powerful business and money manipulators such as the Bush family, the Bin Laden family, the Rothschilds and so it goes on.

You can see the same things in some of the American political showmen, was it Newt Gingrich who was stalling the proceedings in the prolonged government shut-down under Obama? The posturing senators and congressmen were doing nothing to resolve problems, they were just taking the opportunity for show-boating and nearly caused a worldwide financial catastrophe.

Anyway, I think I feel the same as you do.

Talk about going against Occam’s Razor. :smile:

Yeah … What an excellent comparison. :roll_eyes:

1 Like

Heck, the firebombing of Tokyo killed far more. But killing civilians with conventional weapons is moral you know. :wink:

1 Like

If he believes that it was blown up by MOSSAD what is your problem ? In the same way you don’t accept his version of events he has the right to not accept yours. You accept the official narrative and he doesn’t just live with it. Would you respect him more if he just tried to fit in and agree with you just for the sake of it ? You and others think he is a deluded fool and he in turn thinks the same, continually locking horns won’t change that.

2 Likes

No, but I peered down her cleavage… :stuck_out_tongue_winking_eye:

1 Like

I understood mate I just didn’t get the connection to me replying to Docs vid by saying bring on a depression, that will show them kind of thing…

I do know what you mean, for some it’s the grab it while ya can cash mercenary type and the long haul power seekers, equally destructive in their pursuits.

1 Like

I didn’t call you a dickhead. I said it was your prerogative to be one.

That’s for me to know and you to guess.

Except my version is supported by facts (not simply the "official narrative,) his is not. He even went so far as to claim that Mossad warned ■■■■ that worked in the building and so, no ■■■■ were killed in the attack. Which of course was demonstratively false.

What would make me respect him would be if he would make honest arguments regardless whether I agreed with him or not. As I said before, ignorance is forgivable, deliberate ignorance (and deliberate outright falsehoods) is not. Letting it stand does a disservice to everyone else who is merely ignorant and is thus vulnerable to believe the tripe.

2 Likes

“You are the one being disrespectful and insulting here, but that’s ok, because it’s your prerogative to be a dickhead.”

Taken in context, you most certainly did, and your denial of doing so makes you a dickhead. That’s an age-old liberal tactic. :stuck_out_tongue:

1 Like

No problem … Brits are a joke. :wink: