You are right Dev but I suspect he knows a lot more about both sides of the argument than the many here who flat out refuse to even look and that has been my main point all along. I think the way it has been force fed to us for all these years most of you are just too afraid to even contemplate looking for fear of what others will think. Caring more about what the crowd think.
You agree with this too ?
Sorry Stu, but Magog has not proven this at all
For those who havenât any researched any of this, Iâm sure there is some truth in this
Yeah I did think of that but not sure I wanna go down that route
Think what I do atm is more effective
Have you only just worked out that what we post here is only opinion
Oh I think he has but most choose to look away. Anyway if nothing else I hope we can put the Conspiracy Nut label and other BS name calling to bed. The Dr Kelly case I feel has set a decent precedent in that regard and I really have doubts about how many of you would say some of this stuff in a face to face situation.
I donât think it is more effective Mag (at least here anyway) but your choice mate.
I believe the rest of the membership doesnât have even have read only access to the RH.
Most of us try to present facts, you tend to largely post opinion, yours and others
Sorry Stu, but I disagree. The Dr Kelly thing is opinion only for my part, I have no facts to support my opinion, the difference is that I present my opinion as just that, opinion
Sorry Asar I didnât have a notification that you had addressed me.
Iâm not sure what Mag said but I suspect it was to do the way those images have been used. As in yes there are some images but the facts presented about what they represent may be contentious.
I was meaning the service people here, regular rank and file not Chief Of Staff.
Thatâs the same for him so we are all Conspiracy nuts including you or we are all just full of opinions.
Wrong - just bc its in Wikipedia donât make it a fact
He presents his and others opinions as facts, not the same at all
How would you know, youâve not managed to post any facts. My research goes way beyond Wiki, youâve not even managed that
This is what I referred to and what Aser misrepresented again.
That sir is only your opinion
I donât think that to be the case and seriously what can only be considered facts ? That, that has a government stamp on ?
This is the issue with most things were the official narrative is challenged. TPTB always manage to clear up like a plague of locusts but they arenât perfect and people pick up on some of the scraps but the default response is for none of it to be credible and we go round in circles because of pig headedness.
It is a fact based on what you have posted
If you canât provide facts and data, then it is only opinion. That goes for me and anyone else
So what yardstick do you use to determine if something you read on the web is fact or opinion or just plain old conspiracy theory.
I
