The Rabbit Hole

Ok Verv everything is black and white.

I’m not pretending you said about my occupation etc I used to explain that if I had a problem as you suggest it would be evident in the part of my life which really matters to me and it doesn’t, hence, I have no problem.

Well if my general stance is to call BS on much of the party line that surely must mean you lap it up.

You flatter yourself mate, it was an exchange yes , an indulgence no.

So what you would like is the kind of “facts” that you find palatable or closely align with what you believe.

Should this be worded as nothing to discuss if what I present doesn’t align with your thinking.

You are a conspiracy theorist because you present only conspiracy theories :rofl::rofl::rofl:

3 Likes

Who would have thought …

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6585263/Damning-new-evidence-Dr-Kelly-DIDNT-commit-suicide.html

2 Likes

Literally speaking yes conservative applies to someone who wants to preserve tradition and is resistant to change, which probably explains why you struggle with new technology(the web and browsers).
And your agenda is to convert ppl to conservatism?
Isn’t that what Islam teaches - conversion of unbelievers?.

Can you link something reputable(ie not wikipedia) that refutes that and maybe leave out the ad hominem attacks which don’t help your argument one jot

Now why doesn’t that surprise me, one of your Hasbara mates doesn’t even read his own posts
But you are missing the point - I don’t post for you I post for everyone else who reads this site. Most of whom will ignore your vitriol and come to their own conclusions.

shit

Somebody said the the Fed is not a private bank.
Somebody is vervy gullible.

gullibility_test

2 Likes

Yep you really are clueless - try google - get your kids to show you how.

5ab664d6040cf

This is a problem with the majority of people. The sooner they realize it the better it’ll be for them.

5 Likes

Wow another conspiracy theory that turns out to be true after all

1 Like

bq-5c0b4928d2d7d

2 Likes

Preserving tradition is what defines tradition.

Resistance to change by a conservative is most often applied to efforts by the left to “progress” toward socialism. It has little to do with resistance to new technology.

Conservatives demanded change in 2016 and got it by electing a non-politician to the highest office in the land. Liberals resisted change in wanting the Hillary to be have her coronation to the establishment throne to continue with the “progressive” agenda.

It is the maniacal refusal of the liberals to accept the results of the 2016 election that epitomizes resistance to change. They can’t stand it because THINGS CHANGED in November 2016.

Proselytizing others to join in one’s beliefs is an effort common to many a group. Liberals do it. Religions do it. Atheists do it. Conspiracy nutjobs do it. Hedonists do it.

It is not generally considered an agenda on it’s own except by those within a group who have been assigned with such a task. To the group overall, it is just a plank in the platform. Regarding political parties, it is expected. That’s how votes are garnered from the undecided.

Every campaign speech is proselytizing. Every conversation to convince someone to change their mind (and agree with you) is proselytizing. All of the illogical shit you post is proselytizing.

See above.

2 Likes

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iAMLWQvxwJ8

2 Likes

Ok Verv everything is black and white.

Good grief, when have I suggested that.

I’m not pretending you said about my occupation etc I used to explain that if I had a problem as you suggest it would be evident in the part of my life which really matters to me and it doesn’t, hence, I have no problem.

That’s great, but I never claimed you had a problem in those areas. Rather that you had a problem in grounding your ideas to the facts.

Well if my general stance is to call BS on much of the party line that surely must mean you lap it up.

Says the guy who laps up all the conspiracy theory garbage. Flat earth and holocaust. Like I said, you are just singing someone else’s party line.

You flatter yourself mate, it was an exchange yes , an indulgence no.

I know exactly what I was doing. It’s not flattery to say I was indulging you, that’s precisely what I was doing. We argued for ages about the holocaust and your denial of it.

So what you would like is the kind of “facts” that you find palatable or closely align with what you believe

I don’t like or choose to believe facts because they are palatable. Facts are facts regardless of how I feel about them.

Should this be worded as nothing to discuss if what I present doesn’t align with your thinking.

Let’s put it another way. It is impossible to have a reasoned discussion with someone who picks and chooses the facts he decides to believe. Like I have repeatedly said, you don’t just deconstruct opinions, your flat earth nonsense demonstrates a willingness to deconstructs basic facts.

You cannot reason with someone if there is no basis on which you can agree - such as facts. When facts don’t matter anymore it’s pointless to have any discussion. I do my best to ground my opinions to the facts, I’m afraid I cannot say the same for you.

Literally speaking yes conservative applies to someone who wants to preserve tradition and is resistant to change, which probably explains why you struggle with new technology(the web and browsers). And your agenda is to convert ppl to conservatism? Isn’t that what Islam teaches - conversion of unbelievers?.

Lol. Manic Magog with yet another killer (retarded) insight. Keep them coming buddy!

Today I learned from the Manic, and possible drunk Magog, that Western Conservatives are just like Muslims.

Yep, all the Conservatives on the board, Manic Magog thinks you are just like Muslims.

Now why doesn’t that surprise me, one of your Hasbara mates

OMG, even your put downs are about the ■■■■■ It’s always the ■■■■ with you isn’t it. The Holocaust - a ■■■■■■ conspiracy. The banking cartel - da Joos again. 9/11 - committed by Mossad. Always the ■■■■■ You are such a transparent ■■■ hater. Maybe that’s your real agenda.

Can you link something reputable(ie not wikipedia) that refutes that and maybe leave out the ad hominem attacks which don’t help your argument one jot

Manic Magog using his ‘reasoning skills’. This time asking me to prove something I claimed didn’t happen!

Manic Magog modus operandi. Make a ridiculous statement > don’t present any credible evidence it is true > then asks someone to prove something didn’t happen.

The burden of proof is yours you drunk ass.

Yep you really are clueless - try google - get your kids to show you how.

Nope. The Fed was created by the US government, it’s run as an independent agency separate from the government. All the ‘profits’ from the Fed are sent to the US government. The US gov. can revoke the Feds charter with an act of Congress. There is some distance between politicians and monetary policy for good reason. It’s called separation of powers.

“Some observers mistakenly consider the Federal Reserve to be a private entity because the Reserve Banks are organized similarly to private corporations. For instance, each of the 12 Reserve Banks operates within its own particular geographic area, or District, of the United States, and each is separately incorporated and has its own board of directors. Commercial banks that are members of the Federal Reserve System hold stock in their District’s Reserve Bank. However, owning Reserve Bank stock is quite different from owning stock in a private company. The Reserve Banks are not operated for profit, and ownership of a certain amount of stock is, by law, a condition of membership in the System. In fact, the Reserve Banks are required by law to transfer net earnings to the U.S. Treasury, after providing for all necessary expenses of the Reserve Banks, legally required dividend payments, and maintaining a limited balance in a surplus fund.”

Operational independence and organised like a private corporation does NOT mean it is privately owned by da Rothschilds.

WGS 84 is only an approximation. The earth is not round, it is a bumpy prolate spheroid.

//pointyears :wink:

1 Like

Precisely so! The gravitational forces of the sun and the moon cause the difference.

Diameter of Earth at equator

Image: snowbrains.com

Because of this, the diameter of the Earth at the equator is about 43 kilometers (27 mi) larger than the pole-to-pole diameter. As a result, the latest measurements indicate that the Earth has an equatorial diameter of 12,756 km (7926 mi) , and a polar diameter of 12713.6 km (7899.86 mi) .

What is the Diameter of Earth? - Universe Today

www.universetoday.com/15055/diameter-of-earth/

1 Like

There are some nuts here, but there are some rock solid and interesting people here too.

I came here from a different place than this crowd, that place was overrun and smothered by liberal jerks intent on taking over the site.

I find this broader PB site, and the RH interesting.

1 Like

It’s easy to burn straw men. If you want to know what a conservative is, ask one.

“resistant to change” ain’t in the definition.

2 Likes