The Nord Stream 2 Pipeline Incident

Scott Ritter interview

Russia has nothing to gain from demolition of the pipelines

Very scary with the delusional imbecile in the white house and power crazy dictator in Russia .

1 Like

Great moment on Bloomberg TV where a commentator pretty says the obvious part out loud!

2 Likes

It took months for the truth to come out.
Seymour Hersh did a great job again.

1 Like

Who’s reporting this? Pravda?

No. The New York Times.

Obviously, people are getting too smart to swallow the liberal NYT / CNN / BBC lies.

Where’s the pro-Ukrainian group in question?
Can you say Washington DC?

2 Likes

Are any people buying this piece of propaganda?

1 Like

US Blew Up Nord Stream Pipeline In 2022 Covert Operation: Top US Journalist

The September 2022 bombing of the undersea Nord Stream gas pipelines was carried out by the US in a covert operation claimed by Seymour Hersh.

Written By

Saumya joshi

The September 2022 bombing of the undersea Nord Stream gas pipelines was carried out by the US in a covert operation claimed Seymour Hersh, American investigative journalist, and political writer, reported ANI. The findings of his investigation were published in Substack.

“On September 26, 2022, a Norwegian Navy P8 surveillance plane made a seemingly routine flight and dropped a sonar buoy. The signal spread underwater, initially to Nord Stream 2 and then on to Nord Stream 1. A few hours later, the high-powered C4 explosives were triggered and three of the four pipelines were put out of commission. Within a few minutes, pools of methane gas that remained in the shuttered pipelines could be seen spreading on the water’s surface and the world learned that something irreversible had taken place,” said Hersh in his findings.

“The White House’s primary objective was to prevent Moscow from considerably boosting its income while simultaneously reducing the dependence of Western Europe, particularly Germany, on inexpensive Russian gas,” said Hersh.

Nord Stream pipeline in a covert operation

Hersh, Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist, asserted that the order to damage the pipelines happened after more than nine months of top-secret debates inside the Washington intelligence community. Further, the investigative journalist shared that NATO and Washington took Nord Stream 1 as problematic enough, but the completion of Nord Stream 2 in September 2021 increased concerns for the US administration.

“If approved by German regulatory authorities, it would double the flow of inexpensive gas to Germany and Western Europe,” said Hersh. Also to note that the US viewed Europe’s reliance on Russian gas as a risk to Ukraine’s backing, as countries like Germany could be unwilling to contribute the necessary funds and weaponry. Meanwhile, the US media news and houses treated it like an unsolved mystery. However, the Biden administration has denied the claims made in the report of the pipeline bombing and called it “utterly false and complete fiction”.

We know who did it.
Pro-Ukrainian?
What does NYT want the sheep to believe?

Its being termed a “Limited Hangout Strategy.”

2 Likes

Absolute clown world

1 Like

Seymour Hersh reacts to the newest narrative by NYT

1 Like

Alexander Mercouris reviews.
After 31 minutes or so.

Contrary to Hersh’s view, I think Biden has no real power.

Hersh has been criticized for not naming his sources.
Why should he? Joo York Times and Washington Pest don’t do that either.

Boy, I didn’t know Norway had a role to play in Nam.

Ridiculous like the narrative that 2 planes took down 3 buildings in Manhattan.
Nonetheless, the narrative is good enough for the sheep.

Or the pentagon?


Larry Johnson (CIA)

2 Likes

The west is now the boogie man! This can not be a good thing in the long view.

1 Like

6 crew members on a yacht blew up the pipelines.
They were pro-Ukrainian.
And a passport was found.

Huh? Didn’t they find an Arab passport right under the Twin Towers?
Yep, the whole planes disintegrated somehow, but they found an Arab passport.
BTW, they found a jet engine too, but it turned out to be a wrong one.

1 Like