Here it’s okay.
…
Who’s angry now, yo?
you actually fashioned this thread for one purpose…
Who do you think you’re kidding?
Why encourage his participation???
Have some fun Louman! It’s not everyday you get the opportunity to triggered Libtards to exposing their public education they received and try to apply it to making any sense in the arguments they construct! 
It’s all emotional!
Private education 9th - MBA…
But close…
It is meant to discourage thread derailing by way of pissing contests and rants being laced into legitimate threads and to give the moderators a place to move offending posts without deleting them…so the crybabies can’t complain that their shitposts were deleted.
I had no particular transgressors in mind. I am among the transgressors. I just hate when a significantly intelligent thread is ruined by being derailed.
Human nature prompts us to “have the last word”, especially when insulted by a worthless fucking troll.
2 Likes
Fresh out of addressing idiots and their lame ass responses.
Like this…
PHD
Law Degree
West Point Graduate
CEO
Hollywood Movie Star
F1 Champion
It’s the internet! I can be anything I want!
Didn’t you try to convince someone you were an attorney?
It is not intended as a request to participate. Reading such gibberish can often be amusing, entertaining, edifying…and it takes some unwanted diversions out of the legitimate threads without requiring deletion of posts, which could be described as curtailing the poster’s freedom of speech.
If someone calls attention to derailment by using @moderators under such, the moderators can use their judgement as to whether the post should be moved here.
If you want to steer a conversation here from another thread, simply follow these steps:
-
Open this thread and click on the main reply button at the bottom of the thread (not replying to a particular post). Leave your blinking cursor in the text box.
-
Go back to the thread you were in and the post you intend to reply to.
-
Highlight part of the text therein…then click on the Quote button that pops up. The quote will then appear in your text pallet associated with this thread. Type your reply and then click the Reply button.
-
You will be asked if you want to reply in the original thread or this thread. Choose this thread.
-
A link will be displayed in the original thread under the post to which you replied. If the poster clicks on it, she/he will be redirected here to read your reply.
1 Like
An investigation by the New York Times has revealed that experts and administration officials tried to warn Trump of the serious nature of the coronavirus pandemic early on. Alerts from high-ranking government experts began as far back as January, six weeks before his administration finally sprang into action on March 16, when he issued concrete guidelines for the public.
The report exhaustively outlines numerous ways in which Trump avoided listening to government authorities as they proposed strategies for dealing with the pandemic. It also details an administration mired in political bickering, which hamstrung officials at every phase of their response. The report prompted epidemiologist Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, to respond that “obviously” lives could have been saved if the government had taken the warnings seriously.
What its like for some to be trapped inside the body of a gay male prostitute.
1 Like
@IcebergSlim you do a lousy job arguing your points.
You rely purely on emotional positions, not empirical ones. Are you a menopausal woman?
2 Likes
Dr. Fauci was advising people as late as February 29th (the LAST day in Feb) to go about their business and socializing as normal.
THIS IS WHAT DR. FAUCI SAID ON FEBRUARY 29TH
On February 29th, he was asked about people wanting to go to malls, movies, maybe the gym, and the hosts wanted to know what “should we be changing our habits and, if so, how?”
His response was, “Right now, at this moment, there’s no need to change anything you’re doing on a day by day basis. Right now the risk is still low, but this could change. I’ve said that many times even on this program. You’ve got to watch out because although the risk is low now, you don’t need to change anything you’re doing.
1 Like
Multiple bulletin media sources are catapulting Grifty’s messaging?
How dutiful, and usefool.
For example?
Take that bluffing shit back to playschool, clown.
…he says as he exemplifies her point. 
Asserting is easy, Dotard…
Typical trailer trash . 
1 Like