Well in which case, given your vast experience, I am disappointed in your low ability in assessing sources. In fact, you have been highly arrogant in assuming that you know all there is to know about a topic, then wading into a thread without listening to the arguments presented. You may well know many things, but you assume that you are always right.
You’re full of shit and just embarrassing yourself even further. I have never claimed to know all that is known on any topic even where I have a great deal of expertise on a subject. I have a great deal of expertise on those subjects because I never cease learning.
If you ever think you can show me to be wrong in anything I have stated be prepared to do so with credible sources or I’ll eat you alive.
You got your answer. The premise that book burning was not part and parcel of Fascism is an absolute lie. I’m not about to waste my time listening to an author who predicates their argument on a lie.
You, because you are a fool, jumped to ‘muh nazis’- whose book burnings we discussed in the podcast (not that you would know this). We were talking about the convergence of Amazon, Facebook, Twitter, and other internet platforms who are owned and operated by people who follow a neo-Marxist ideology, and their penchant for censorship
BUT MUH NAZI BURNED BOOKS
Give me a break, you don’t even know what the conversation is, go yell at the TV.
Obviously you don’t mind making a complete ass of yourself for all to see.
You began this thread justifying the book burning by fascists while still deflecting to communists as the real problem.
Totalitarianism by fascists and communists killed a 150,000,000 people on just two continents alone in the last century and more than a billion suffered as a result of it.
Go get an education somewhere you ignorant twit and then come back and try to debate like an adult.
You got your answer. The premise that book burning was not part and parcel of Fascism is an absolute lie. I’m not about to waste my time listening to an author who predicates their argument on a lie.