Another steaming pile brought to you by Magog.
Exactly! They stole Palestine and gave more than half of it to the ■■■■■■ invaders
And the only evidence there ever was an Israel is in the bible which everyone agrees is a fairy story
Another steaming crock full on your part.
The current state of Israel takes up less than 1/3 of “Palestine” as it was constituted for over 3,000 years.
Jordan was supposed to be the Arab state for Palestinians.
This was the 1939 partition plan that the ■■■■ accepted and the Arabs eventually rejected.
The final version of the 1947 partition plan.
The combined armies of the Arab states then immediately tried to drive the ■■■■ into the sea as soon as the British mandate over Palestine ended.
The ■■■■ then defeated them and the borders were frozen.
Subsequently in two different wars the Arabs tried again, and the borders were again expanded as the Israelis occupied the lands used by the Arabs to attack them.
After the 1973 war Israeli forces actually drove the Egyptians all the way back to the suez canal and Red sea, they later gave all of that land back as part of the peace negotiations.
You are a hate filled, ignorant, lying troll, there is no reasoning with you.
Your reasoned well researched posts are much appreciated thanks for your input
The Woodhead commission was borne out of the Balfour declaration which promised Rothschild that the British would give Palestine to the Joos.
The whole episode was an illegal fraud and cannot be justified in any sane or moral way
Thank you for once again proving my point.
“Palestine” was nothing more than a region, it was not a nation and never had been.
Ottoman Palestine.
The “Palestinians” have never been anything more than assortment of various tribes inhabiting the region.
And where is Israhell on that map - NOWHERE LOL
Brilliant observation. At least sometimes you can grasp the simplest of things.
Where is the nation of Palestine on the same map?
yeah you better delete that shit because you know TWR just handed you your ass on a platter.
(AGAIN)
The ONLY place Israel is ever mentioned is in the bible.
The only place Solomon is ever mentioned is in the bible
The only place David is ever mentioned is in the bible
Palestine was referenced by the Greeks, the Romans, Alexander the Great, The Sumerians.
We have established conclusively that the bible is a work of fiction written by someone who heard voices in his head - Think the evidence is clear that the bible is just a good story ergo there is no Israel and never was any evidence that it ever existed.
King David and Solomon presided over a great empire in the Old Testament. And although Christian tradition fought long and hard to retain that myth, archaeological and historical investigation have comprehensively shown that there was no such great empire
1 Like
Back on topic - Israhell is fcuked anyway
Why do you keep repeating the same lies in thread after thread?
Israel as a cultural entity is first mentioned in the stele of the Egyptian pharaoh Merenptah (1213-1203 BCE) in which he states that “Israel lies devastated, bereft of its seed” (Kerrigan, 59). The reference seems to be to a people, not a kingdom, but no scholarly consensus has been reached on a final meaning nor even why Israel should be mentioned on a stele which celebrates an Egyptian victory over the Libyans unless the Israelites were part of the coalition known as the Sea Peoples, which is improbable.
You know you’re lying, we all know you’re lying so what is the point other than to confirm that you hate blindly and lie without the slightest remorse?
As for those foreign inscriptions, texts from the neighboring lands refer to the people, to their kings, to their government, to their armies and to their cities. The basic fact: everybody knew that Israel was there: the Egyptians, the Assyrians, the Babylonians, the Arameans, the Moabites, the Persians. Pharaoh Merneptah (1213-1203 B.C.E.) refers to the people of Israel in a stone stele. Pharaoh Shoshenk I (c. 945-924 B.C.E.) describes his campaign in which he refers to cities in Israel (including Ayalon, Beth-Shan, Megiddo, Rehob and Taanach).
Assyrian King King Shalmaneser III names King “Ahab the Israelite” among his opponents in his Kurkh monument and names and pictures King Jehu on his Black Obelisk. Seven other Assyrian emperors also refer to Israel and Judah and name kings who are also mentioned in the Bible. The Babylonian sources, too, refer to the ■■■■ and their monarchy in the years after the Babylonians replaced the Assyrian empire.
And the record continues when the Persians replace the Babylonians, as documented in the Cylinder of Cyrus, the Persian emperor. Cyrus’ decree in 538 B.C.E., let the exiled ■■■■ return to their land; it was followed by an influx of ■■■■■■ population. There was population growth from the reign of Darius I to Artaxerxes I. The country that the Babylonians had conquered was reestablished as a state of Judah (yehud medintha ) within the Persian umbrella. You want irony? Persia, now called Iran, the country that re-established the ■■■■■ country in biblical times, now has a president who says that Israel has no roots there.
Also from that period come the Elephantine papyri, a collection of documents that include letters from the ■■■■■■ community in Egypt in the fifth century B.C.E. to the ■■■■■■ community back in Jerusalem.
Closer to home, right across the Jordan River from Israel was Moab, in what is now Jordan. In the ninth century B.C.E., its King Mesha erected a stele referring to Israel and its King Omri. He also refers to the royal House of David. An inscription erected by an Aramean (what is today Syria) also refers to a king of the House of David. In all, these ancient texts refer to 15 kings of Israel and Judah who are known from the Bible, and all are referred to in the right periods.
Umm, no. Moving our troops out deconflicts the battlespace and gives them a much freer hand to act if they so choose.
Think its called debate
Do you have any source that isn’t Israeli??
Biased? much
Lying is not “debating”.
Let me see if I can help you. Moabite, is not Israel. Egyptian is not Israel. Assyria and Persia are not Israel.
You’ve been given the facts repeatedly yet you continue lying to smear Israel and ■■■■ in general which speaks volumes about you, not them.
You are nothing but a lying, hate filled wannabe Nazi troll.
At least stop embarrassing yourself by attempting to repeat the same lies here and try to find a crowd somewhere ignorant enough to believe them and too lazy to check the actual facts.
The National Monarchy (c.1020-586 BCE)
- Problems with Philistines: 1-2 Samuel
- The Ekron Inscription 7th cent BCE [At Hanson’s website]
- Saul (c.1020-1000 BCE), 1 Samuel 8 [At Bible Gateway]
- David (1000-961 BCE)
- Rise to Power: (1 Samuel 16:14-23; 17:1-11, 32-35) [At Bible Gateway]
- The Succession Document (aka Court History): 2 Samuel 9-20; 1 Kings:1-2 [At Bible Gateway]
- The Tel Dan Inscription 9th-7th Cent BCE [At Hanson’s website]
- WEB The Tel Dan Inscription [Internet Archive]
Concerns the discovery of an Aramaic inscription in 1993, which may be first extrabiblical evidence for the House of David.- Solomon (961-922 BCE)
- The United Kingdom of Israel, II Samuel 5-8; I Kings 4-6, 9-11 [At Bible Gateway]
- Building of the First Temple: I Kings 6-7; 2 Chronicles 3-4.[At Bible Gateway]
- 2ND The Byt Yhwh Ostracon 9th-7th Cents. BCE [At Hanson’s website]
Image and text of the oldest extra biblical mention of Soloman’s temple.- Israel and Judah (922-586 BCE)
- Sennacherib’s Campaign vs. Judea 701 BCE [At Internet Archive, from ANET]
- Accounts of the Campaign of Sennacherib, 701 BCE [At this Site]
- II Kings 15-17, Conquest of Israel by the Assyrians, 722BCE [At Then Again] [Ignore typo of Judah for Israel in the document]
- II Chronicles 36:9-23
- II Kings 23-25, Conquest of Judah by Babylon (Chaldea), 586 BCE [At Then Again]
https://sourcebooks.fordham.edu/ancient/asbook06.asp#The%20National%20Monarchy
Monolith Inscription of Shalmaneser III. Found in 1861 at Kurkh on the Tigris River in southeastern Turkey, the inscription records the principal events of the king’s first six military campaigns against the Arameans in Syria. The campaign of year six, 853 BC, mentions Ahab, king of Israel, as being part of an anti-Assyrian coalition that confronted the Assyrians at Qarqar on the Orontes River in western Syria. According to the numbers of foot soldiers and chariots listed in the inscription, Ahab was one of the major partners in the coalition. Although Shalmaneser boasted of a great victory, that is questionable since he returned immediately to Assyria following the battle and was obliged to later return to the area to face the same coalition in his 10th, 11th and 14th years. The writing is inscribed on both sides of the stele. On the front, it covers most of the area, including over the body of Shalmaneser, from his shoulders to below his feet. Mike Luddeni
Much of Ahab’s attention, however, was taken up with a war against Syria to the north (1 Kgs 20). When Israel had gained the upper hand, a peace treaty between the two nations was struck which lasted three years (1 Kgs 20:31–34, 22:1). This period of peace was born out of necessity, for both Syria and Israel now faced a common enemy—Assyria.
Shalmaneser III (859–825 BC) was on the throne of Assyria and he was steadily pushing westward. In order to counteract this powerful foe, the kingdoms of the west joined to form a unified coalition. In the year 853 BC this coalition, including Ahab of Israel, came face to face with Shalmaneser III and his forces at Qarqar, in north Syria. This confrontation undoubtedly took place during the three years of peace between Israel and Syria mentioned in 1 Kings 22:1. Shalmaneser tells of the battle, from his own point of view of course, in his Monolith Inscription:
I departed from Argana and approached Qarqar. I destroyed, tore down, and burned down Qarqar, his royal residence. He brought twelve kings to his support; they came against me to offer battle and fight: 1,200 chariots, 1,200 cavalry, and 20,000 soldiers belonging to Hadad-ezer of Damascus; 700 chariots, 700 cavalry, and 10,000 soldiers belonging to Irhuleni of Hama; 2,000 chariots, and 10,000 soldiers belonging to Ahab, the Israelite…10,000 soldiers from Irqanata; 200 soldiers of Matinu-ba’lu from Arvad; 200 soldiers from Usanata; 30 chariots, 1(0?),000 soldiers of Aduna-ba’lu from Shian; 1,000 camel-(rider)s of Gindibu from Arabia {…},000 soldiers of Ba’sa, son of Ruhubi, from Ammon— (all together) these were 12 kings. They rose against me {for a} decisive battle. I fought with them with (the support of) the mighty forces of Ashur, which Ashur, my Lord, has given to me, (and) I did inflict a defeat upon them between the towns of Qarqar and Gilzau (ANET 278–79).
The Heliodorus Stele also confirms contact and communication between Ancient Israel and Early Greece.
The Israel Museum unveiled today a unique 2,200-year-old stele (inscribed stone block) that provides new insight into the dramatic story of Heliodorus and the Temple in Jerusalem, as related in the Second Book of Maccabees.
“The Heliodorus stele is one of the most important and revealing Hellenistic inscriptions from Israel,” said James S. Snyder, Anne and Jerome Fisher Director of the Israel Museum. “It contextualizes the Second Book of Maccabees and provides an independent and authentic source for an important episode in the history leading up to the Maccabean Revolt, whose victorious conclusion is celebrated each year during the ■■■■■■ festival of Hanukkah.”
The newly deciphered stele presents new information about Heliodorus, who, according to the Second Book of Maccabees, received orders to seize the treasure in the Temple in Jerusalem, but was driven from the sanctuary by the miraculous appearance of a fearsome horseman accompanied by two mighty youths.This presentation marks the first public display of the Heliodorus stele, which is on extended loan to the Museum from Michael and Judy Steinhardt of New York. The stele documents a correspondence in ancient Greek between Heliodorus and King Seleucus IV, ruler of the Seleucid Empire from 187 to 175 BCE, who was succeeded by Antiochus IV Epiphanes (best known from the story of Hanukkah). In his letter, King Seleucus announces the appointment of an administrator to oversee the sanctuaries within the province that included the Land of Israel.
The appointment of an overseer of the sanctuaries – including the Temple in Jerusalem – was intended to bring the province into line with the rest of the Seleucid Empire. This position included authority over the sanctuaries’ revenues and, above all, taxes due to the king. It is likely, however, that the ■■■■ regarded this appointment as an infringement of ■■■■■■ religious autonomy.
This episode may have foreshadowed events yet to come. Less than ten years later (169/8 BCE), a new Seleucid king, Antiochus IV Epiphanes, and his armies would enter Jerusalem, massacre its inhabitants, rob the Temple treasury, and desecrate the Holy of Holies. Thus the new appointment, recorded on the stele, appears to mark the beginning of Greek/Seleucid interference in ■■■■■■ religious affairs, which eventually led to the outbreak of the Maccabean revolt in 167 BCE.The Heliodorus stele is part of a special display, curated by David Mevorah, Curator of Hellenistic, Roman, and Byzantine Archaeology, entitled “Royal Correspondence on Stone – The Overseer of the Sanctuaries.” On view through June 2007, this presentation also includes another Hellenistic stele from the royal administration of the Seleucid Empire – the Hefzibah stele – part of the Museum’s permanent archaeological holdings.
The writings on the Heliodorus stele have been deciphered and interpreted by Professor Hannah Cotton-Paltiel of The Hebrew University of Jerusalem and Professor Michael Woerrle of the Commission for Ancient History and Epigraphy at the German Archaeological Institute in Munich. Analysis of the stone’s patina by Professor Yuvel Goren of Tel Aviv University suggests that the stele most likely came from the lowlands between the Judaean hills and the Mediterranean coast… .