More completely unsupportable bullshit.
No. Charlie Kirk is a potato head moron. The point I was making was in response to @twr who claimed:
I responded…Charlie Kirk, did.
Which is a lie, he did no such thing there.
Yes he did. Not like you will watch it…I fully understand that you are a paid JIDF shill, but this is still fun.
1 Like
Wow - you guys have absolutely destroyed this thread. Anyway, since this is now about the USS Liberty, I think we can all agree that what happened is highly controversial and not clear cut.
Do you realize much of the incident remain classified and not accessible which means most information is simply opinion?
Except that there isn’t even any doubt here: it’s a commonly accepted fact by every mainstream source that Israel attacked the USS Liberty.
I watched it several times and he does no such thing. The crew and families are’t even mentioned.
He dismissed the conspiracy nut just as he should have but he in no way denigrates the sailors or their families.
Either you’re flat out lying yourself or you’re completely ignorant and just repeating baseless bullshit because it supports your own prejudices.
Nobody anywhere denies that Israel attacked the Liberty.
When the Neo Nazis go on the march not even a concrete wall of facts can deter them.
lol - typical leftist. People who disagree with you now and provide supporting evidence are neo-Nazis.
Just rolled in this thread like…
You haven’t provided any evidence. You provided lies that aren’t even supported by your own citations.
Don’t feed the animals.
The evidence was provided by @KhazarMilkers which disputed the claim you have been puking out all over this thread. A claim that only came to fruition 40 years after the attack. The evidence provided by @KhazarMilkers came from a classified intelligence report created by the Central Intelligence Agency at the time of the attack.
No evidence has been provided.
Charlie Kirk never said what is claimed and the only “evidence” as to the supposed Israeli conspiracy in the Liberty attack is uncorroborated garbage that is completely unverifiable.
I on the other hand provided a link to all of the official reports done on the incident none of which support the claim that it was an intentional attack on the US by Israel.
None of you would even open the page much less download the documents out of fear it would show even to you that the claims are baseless.
From the link you posted above:
There have been a number of reports relating to USS Liberty. Most of them are nothing more than summaries of materials gathered by others, not investigations where testimony and other evidence was presented. Still there are some who try to pass these summaries off as “investigations that exonerate Israel.” On the contrary, where any opinion is expressed at all, it usually tends to incriminate Israel.
I see that reading is not one of your strong suits. You are a passionate and dedicated shill, I’ll give you that… But at the end of the day a shill is a shill and you will only post the messages that you are instructed to. Any points made against your narrative will be immediately shouted down without any evidence or proof. Unfortunately for you this was a sloppy job on your part. You literally provided a site that counters your claim and reinforces the claims that many of us have been making. Thank you for that.
2 Likes
You are quoting opinion, not any of the documents linked on the sites all of which show that statement to be false.
Start with the transcript of the Navy’s investigation.
Here is the synopsis of the Navy report on the site you linked to as authoritative:
The US Navy court of inquiry “investigation” began before USS Liberty made port following the attack and was completed less than ten days after the attack… The public copy of the NCOI transcript has been denounced as a fraud by the JAG officer responsible for certifying the original transcript.
1 Like
Summary written by whom and when?
I don’t see any such summary here.
http://www.gtr5.com/evidence/nsa_report_dir.pdf
Or here:
http://www.gtr5.com/evidence/ramron.htm
Just admit that you haven’t read any of the documents and aren’t inclined to so we can move on.