Right. You should seek treatment for that complex.
Itās the guys that buck convention and announce new discoveries and/or show previous theories to be false embarrassing everyone else in the field that become legends in science.
Iāll take that as a ānoā then - thanks for answering.
āReading for Dummiesā is a book you should buy.
There are lots of qās abt the space program and NASA(Never A Straight Answer) is unable to answer ANY of them. For instanceā¦
NASA is pretty vague these days about the Saturn V. After the Shuttle disaster in 1986, caused by a problem with one of its solid rocket fuel boosters and killing all its seven crewmembers, NASA had to suspend Shuttle operations for over two years while it sorted its rockets out. This is of course a familiar story, typical of the USAās space program since the beginning (the great exception being the 100% reliable, super-powerful Saturn V, which of course was scrapped).
https://www.serendipity.li/more/myth_of_apollo.htm#3
The Shuttle program did not employ the use of the Saturn V, and the shuttle blew up due to iced up insulation breaking free puncturing the hull and liquid fuel tanks.
Exactly what questions is it you think are floating around that have not been answered?
NASA never gives you any straight answer.
In one of the explosions, there was one more astronaut killed, but his name was never made public.
I donāt remember which year, but there was also a midair explosion with Ronald and Nancy Reagan watching. But that shuttle sank into the ocean in one piece, and never broke up into pieces midair.
Pure fabricated completely unsupportable Bullshit.
Most fuselage with crew intact
(They were dead alright)
Some may think otherwise
https://en.suenee.cz/posadka-raketoplanu-challenger-zije/
Well NASA has to have the odd disaster now and again otherwise the public would smell a rat? Itās just a part of the brainwashing.
Bullshit.
Exactly what I wanted.
The fuselage still in one piece (which was broken up during salvage)
No it isnāt itās in pieces, most of the crew cabin section remained in tact and thatās it. Everything behind the escape door is just gone and it sets at the rear of the crew cabin.
Your claim was an outright fabrication, period.
Thatās what Iām saying. Whatās wrong with you.
That isnāt what you stated at any point here.
First you claimed the whole thing went down in tact, then you claimed the fuselage was all in tact with just one wing missing.
Less than 1/4 of the fuselage remained in tact.
NASA didnāt hide any of this. The only things not made public were at the request of the families that didnāt want every gruesome detail of the autopsies revealed.
Heres a few
How did they get through the VA belts
Why wonāt Buzz swear on the bible that he landed?
Why canāt you see stars up there
Why didnāt we go back
Why were the āāmoonāā rocks just petrified wood and why didnāt they bring back any cheese?
Why was there no time lag in the interviews from the astronauts
Thereās loads more but thats a few to be going with for now.
1 Like
The second transmission takes place 55 hours into the journey when they are supposed to be 200,000 miles from Earth. Lovell says: āWe are manoeuvring now for the TV. Bill has got it set up in Frankās left rendezvous window, and Iām over in Billās spot looking out the right rendezvous window. The Earth is now passing through my window. Itās about as big as the end of my thumb.ā Once again, viewers at home are deprived of the picture they must have wanted. If only Bill had thought to hand the camera over to Lovell! Curiously, the crew is also unable to show viewers the Moon, even though the Apollo craft is by now less than 50,000 miles away.
The third transmission, 69 hours into the mission, comes as Apollo 8 is making its first orbit of the Moon. It is a tense moment on the journey and viewers are made to wait as the Command Module returns from the Moonās far side, where it has been out of radio contact. When it does so, viewers on Earth are treated to pictures of the Moon for the first time. It is seen as an off-white globe, randomly covered in well-defined bumps and shallow craters. Lovell gives his impressions: āThe Moon is essentially gray, no color. Looks like plaster of Paris. Sort of grayish sand ā¦ā I consider this representation of the Moon more closely in the later section on the video footage of the Apollo 11 mission.
The fourth transmission takes place 86 hours into the mission as the Command Module is apparently starting its tenth and final orbit of the Moon. The astronauts, each in turn, give their reactions to the Moon, which they phrase in poetic terms. āThe Moon is a different thing to each one of us,ā swoons Borman. āMy own impression is that itās a vast, lonely forbidding type of existence, a great expanse of nothing.ā Not to be outdone, Lovell chips in: āThe vast loneliness of the Moon up here is awe-inspiring ā¦the Earth from here is just a grand oasis in the big vastness of space.ā Moonstruck, the astronauts seem by now to have forgotten all about pointing their camera at the Earth.
There is at least one other fascinating feature about Phillipsās article and that is its title, āA Most Fantastic Voyageā. Look up the word āfantasticā in a dictionary. Mine defines it as: fanciful; not real; capricious; whimsical; wild; incredible. I couldnāt have put it better myself. But thatās the word chosen, consciously or not, by the Apollo Programās own director! Apollo 8 certainly was a fantastic voyage and so were the Apollo missions that came after. It was a fantasy the world has enthusiastically shared in ever since.
1 Like
Ever watched an interview on TV, where the subject is maybe 200 miles away THERE IS something called a timelag in the conversation.
There is something seriously wrong here and it crops up on all the Apollo missions: thereās no regular time lag between Mission Control speaking and an astronaut replying. Those guys were supposed to be almost 250,000 miles away.
It has that distinctive āsuper-imposedā look which Hollywood, at the time, had not been able to eradicate. It is immediately obvious. If youāre still doubtful, watch closely for the small corrective movements the Lunar Module makes as it gets closer. They are much too quick and shaky for a craft of several tons. They are consistent entirely with a small plastic model being operated remotely.
1 Like
Wings and tails may have broken off.
The fuselage seems to have remained as one piece, as your video also shows.
I had never mentioned that.
I had never said that either
Bottom line: You cannot trust NASA with their narratives in the media.