I was actually hypothesizing about a scenario in which the prosecutor does everything to protect him and ruins the chances of any subsequent prosecution though some trickery like sealing ALL his files or charging him with everything but then letting him off the hook… forever ensuring that he will not need to talk about Clinton ( or whoever) to get a deal.
Yes… don’t say it. I know it’s wild and unprecedented and conspiracy theory stuff.
It might be if you weren’t talking about the Clintons who have managed to slip off the hook in “curious” ways in prior cases that no one thought possible.
I think the Clintons have followed the Hoover model where they have enough dirt on everyone in power to make them virtually untouchable.
That’s not what I said. Did you have anything to say to those suggesting she’s disqualified simply by virtue of who her father is. Why not question them on their personal knowledge and intimacy with her, hmmm…
And in circles and circles and circles we go, not once acknowledging the basis of why someone would make that claim in the first place! Let’s leave out the details of the argument and argue the minutia of a cherry picked statement while ignoring the rest of the context. You always end up looking dim witted by putting forth such meaningless arguments! It never ceases to amaze me how you pursue such paths of discourse!
Can you explain why your posts are ok and not a conspiracy but everyone else is a conspiracy nutjob?.
Some of your content is not dissimilar to that of other posters, is it just cohencidence?