I have read Shirers book but not Bullocks so I looked him up and this was the first line on his Wiki entry…
Hitler: A Study in Tyranny , the first comprehensive biography of Adolf Hitler, which he based on the transcripts of the Nuremberg Trials.
Do you really think that a book based on the fraudulent Nuremberg trials can be anything but biased.
I have also read Mein Kampf - have you read any of Irvings books?
Or Henry Ford or Alexander Solzhenitsyn
Well that certainly says it all.
Germans were tortured, beaten, to make the “confessions.”
Total kangaroo court
Complete BS that you can’t possibly back up with a single verifiable fact.
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v12/v12p167_Weberb.html
"Allied prosecutors used torture to help prove their case at Nuremberg and other postwar trials.
Former Auschwitz commandant Rudolf Höss was tortured by British officials into signing a false and self-incriminating “confession” that has been widely cited as a key document of Holocaust extermination. His testimony before the Nuremberg Tribunal, a high point of the proceeding, was perhaps the most striking and memorable evidence presented there of a German extermination program. /73 Höss maintained that two and half million people had been killed in Auschwitz gas chambers, and that another 500,000 inmates had died there of other causes. No serious or reputable historian now accepts either of these fantastic figures, and other key portions of Höss’ “confession” are now generally acknowledged to be untrue. "
1 Like
Completely unverifiable BS from yet another source with zero credibility.
Accusations are not facts.
http://auschwitz.org/en/history/holocaust-denial/the-institute-for-historical-review
https://phdn.org/negation/gravediggers/gom-2004-M-mark_weber_IHR.html
Nazi’s and other Antisemites trying to whitewash the history of the Nazis and paint the ■■■■ as the devils of the world.
1 Like
Do you know how many missiles Hezbollah has got - aimed directly at Israel from Lebanon and now Iraq?
The Ayatollah could close the straits NOW just by announcing that it is closed - No shipping co would even try to get through bc they wouldn’t be able to get insurance. And not one shot needs to be fired - this will not be a conventional war a la WW2, and only stupid Americans think they can win it with bombs.
It won’t be large scale but it might be prolonged - if you give Iran no choice they will respond at whatever cost - it may bankrupt them but they will go down fighting
Iran is not ever going to invade Israel, but even the threat of them lobbing missiles across the border will paralyse Israel
It’s never gonna do that - you really need to get out of your macho ‘‘bomb the shit outta them’’ mentality
Yep and if you make it worse they WILL retaliate.
It doesn’t matter how many missiles they have to aim at Israel, most will hit open land/desert and Israel has the finest systems in the world to interdict those that actually threaten population centers.
The Ayatollah can close the straits? Sure he can and the minute he does the US and European Allies along with Saudis, Israel and Jordan along with probably Egypt will turn Iran into a smoking hole.
The first thing we’ll do is destroy probably at the same time their air force, navy, and shore batteries which will take maybe 48 hours, 72 for complete cleanup.
They’ll certainly go down, and from the inside. All we have to do is eliminate their offensive capabilities, destroy their major formations, command and control along with what I outlined above.
The only thing keeping them in power now is the fact the population has been disarmed which would cease immediately.
Iran lacks the ability to seriously harm Israel or they already would have.
Iran is pushing this, not the US or anyone else and it is they who keep escalating it.
When they go too far they will be destroyed.
1 Like
WOW I’m impressed - in the last 4 hours you have made over 40 posts - that is one every 5 mins(most in different threads). Who would do that? unless they are paid per post.
JFYI it was 9am in Tel Aviv 5 hrs ago but that is just cohencidence.
@TWR @Patriot
I’m posting on three different forums right now all with completely different formats and subject matter.
It takes me all of ten seconds to write my average post since I’m a touch typist who averages about 78wpm net.
I’m up all night with a sick baby and nothing good on TV.
1 Like
Vietnam was a lost cause, in case you have been in coma.
Over 100 dead US soldiers. Game over. The public is going to pressure for an end to the intervention.
Iran has no interest in the land of Palestine, but it certainly send missiles. Good ones.
Well, that’s BS. We’ve lost over 10,000 in Iraq and Afghanistan and another thousand in places you couldn’t find on a map since 9-11.
The only VN was a lost cause was the fact LBJ didn’t want to win it and set the ROE so tightly our soldiers couldn’t do what was necessary.
One of Trump’s first acts was to relax restrictions on the ROE and gave commanders in the field broad authority to act as they feel necessary.
Iran has no thick forests or jungles, it’s mostly desert so it’s damned hard to hide assets.
We can target any static facilities at any time, have constant satellite tracking on their mobile assets so targeting both is no problem.
The biggest danger is their fast boats and we can blow them out of the water before they ever get within range of a ship.
Oh, BTW, about 85% of Iran’s airforce are VN era fighters that pose no serious threat to our aircraft or ships and which both can target and destroy at will far out of their range.
1 Like
Are you referring to the aircraft on the carriers that will soon be submarines?
Well, that’s just stupid.
Our carriers never have to get within range of Iran before Iran’s capabilities to sink them are destroyed.
1 Like
We also are not limited to carrier based aircraft for an attack on Iran.
1 Like
The Nuremberg trials weren’t fraudulent. There was no doubt some bias from the ally’s, but the hordes of witness testimony is valid. Btw, there could have just as easily been trials of Americans for the war crimes also committed, but the victors aren’t usually held to any accountability.
No, thank you for the lead.
1 Like
If China’s got them, Iran has too.
In 2009, it became clear that China had developed a mobile medium-range ballistic missile called the DF-21D designed to sink ships over 900 miles away.
There’s not a plane or missile Iran can put in the air the US cannot intercept.
Even if we assumed they have a long range anti-ship missile the batteries can be destroyed without the carriers ever coming in range of them.
1 Like
Do you accept that any of the accused were tortured?
If they were(and I believe they were) then the trials were fraudulent.
1 Like