Ever ask yourself why they were so oppressed.
How do you know god gave them Palestine?
1 Like
1 Like
That’s about the umpteenth time you’ve posted that shit.
Got anything original?
That’s a great song. It’s about optimism, not understanding.
He misses the daily stormer!
And thats the umpteenth time you called me anti-semitic
I will continue to post it every time someone calls me anti semitic.
1 Like
I’m fully aware of that and his collusion (
) with FDR to drag the US into the war.
1 Like
Name calling and personal insults…
Then we will just Flagg it for multiple posts like your multiple personalities!
We??? - I assume ‘‘we’’ is you and your Hasbara chums?
Nah, its about the weather.
Feel free…This is a free speech site after all
1 Like
It’s a free speech site that is subject to policy guidelines and clearly you are abusing the privilege!
Anti-Semitism is an (intentional) misnomer.
The vast majority of ■■■■ today (Ashkenazi) are not Semites.
The Ashkenazi ■■■■ descended from Khazars, who converted to Talmudic Judaism in the 9th century.
Khazars were a branch of nomadic Asian Gokturks whose origin was in northern China. They fought the Chinese, but lost. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Göktürks
(Gog and Magog)
Their king was called Kagan: a ■■■■■■ surname today.
1 Like
Semite
[ sem-ahyt or, esp. British, see-mahyt ]
|
noun
-
a member of any of various ancient and modern peoples originating in southwestern Asia, including the Akkadians, Canaanites, Phoenicians, Hebrews, and Arabs.
-
a ■■■■
-
a member of any of the peoples descended from Shem, the eldest son of Noah.
That’s correct. The vast majority of ■■■■ today are Ashkenazi, who descended from Asian / Mongolian Khazars (a.k.a. Gog and Magog in the Bible)
In all of history that’s probably correct but I’d argue that the Kurds have been the most shit on people on the planet for the last couple of hundred years.
In every war since the original Caliphate was finally destroyed and southern Europe, western Asia was retaken by the Christians the Kurds have sided with the Allies on the promise of the restoration of Kurdistan.
They keep dying like flies under one repressive regime after another as the west keeps promising them the return of their homeland and each time when the wars have been won there’s always an excuse not to fulfill that promise.
Why do you keep repeating this lie when it has been so thoroughly disproven again and again?
This is straight from Wikipedia, heavily doctored by ■■■■■
Even they admit that Khazars converted to Judaism
" Bulan was a Khazar king who led the conversion of the Khazars to Judaism. His name means “elk” or “hart” in Old Turkic. In modern Turkish, it means The one who finds (Bul + an). The date of his reign is unknown, as the date of the conversion is hotly disputed, though it is certain that Bulan reigned some time between the mid-8th and the mid-9th centuries. Nor is it settled whether Bulan was the Bek or the Khagan of the Khazars.
D. M. Dunlop was certain that Bulan was a Khagan; however, more recent works, such as The ■■■■ of Khazaria by Kevin Brook, assume that he was the Bek due to references to him leading military campaigns. Khazar tradition held that before his own conversion, Bulan was religiously unaffiliated. In his quest to discover which of the three Abrahamic religions would shape his own religious beliefs, he invited representatives from each to explain their fundamental tenets. In the end, he chose Judaism.
In the Khazar Correspondence, King Joseph traces his lineage back to Bulan. He refers to the reforming Khazar ruler Obadiah as being one of “the sons of the sons of Bulan”. While Brook assumes this makes Obadiah Bulan’s grandson, the Hebrew phrase is less definitive and may allude to a more remote descent. The royal descendants of Bulan are referred to by Khazar researchers as Bulanids, though their self-designation is unknown.
The name Sabriel is given in the Schechter Letter (roughly contemporaneous with King Joseph’s letter) for the Khazar king who led the conversion to Judaism. The Schechter Letter also gives Sabriel at least a partial ■■■■■■/Israelite ancestry. Sabriel is described as having waged successful campaigns in the Caucasus and Iranian Azerbaijan, possibly as part of the Khazar-Arab wars.
His wife, Serakh, is described as a ■■■ and as encouraging him to study and adopt Judaism. The Schechter Letter is silent on the issue of whether Sabriel was Bulan; the name Bulan does not appear in that document.
Khazar scholars sometimes refer to the king who led the Khazar conversion to Judaism as “Bulan Sabriel”, though it is conceivable that they may have been different people. In The History of the ■■■■■■ Khazars , for instance, D. M. Dunlop examined (and ultimately rejected) the theory of other scholars that Sabriel referred to Obadiah.
Stanford Mommaerts-Brown, a genealogist, historian and also a convert to Judaism, would point out that it is common for ■■■■■ whether born among gentiles or converts, to have two names. One is of the nomenclature of the people among whom (s)he lives, (or was born), and a Hebrew name. Mr. Mommaerts-Brown’s name is Yonathan Micah Hillel. ‘Bulan’ is clearly a Turkic name. After conversion he would have taken a Hebrew or ■■■■■■ name. ‘Sabriel’ looks very much to be a Turkic idiomatic variation of ‘Gabriel’."