How Not To Create Threads And Respond To Mods

Look, if you want your Forum to look like Storm Front, that’s your prerogative. But please, quit denying that is what is going on.

Not taking the bait (rule number 7 in the 3-day suspension category) has reached the point where one would be unable to participate in the forum. The ■■■ haters contaminate virtually every popular thread they encounter and they get away with it in spite of the well publicized rule here to not derail threads because the Mods tolerate it even when those posts get flagged.

1 Like

I guess you didn’t read this entire thread where I was actively reigning in the EXACT shit you are talking about. Maybe you should scroll up a bit before getting all preachy with me.

Just the fact that some here (including the Mods) consider us to be “a group” is reason enough to think that we are all bearing animosity from other “groups.” We were specifically recruited from Hannity to join Freebird by Patriot and then when that site went to shit because of a troll invasion, we in turn were invited to move here (again by Patriot) and awarded “founding member” status. In other words, we (as a group) are an integral part of the culture of this Forum, yet we get treated as trouble makers simply because we are disgusted with the tolerance for ■■■■■■■■■■ propaganda that flourishes here and choose to fight back against it. If that means that we are violating the culture of the community, so be it. That is something to be proud of.

You were invited by @Patriot here from Freebird. You were not invited to Freebird and you weren’t recruited off Hannity by @Patriot

That is one of the most outrageous statements you have ever made here. Even after being inundated with evidence that you are completely wrong on a subject (take the 9/11 thread for example) you continue to shed the truth like water off a duck and continue to spew your nonsense. Maybe you never wrote the words “I am right,” but you have consistently demonstrated that you believe it to be true.

Every time I try, you and your ■■■■■■■■■■ buddies see to it that it follows. You can hardly find a thread in these forums with more then 50 posts that doesn’t have several telling us all that “the ■■■■ are to blame”

get-ready-lads-salt-mine-ahead-29863448

That’s YOUR characterization of it. But drawing attention to the inequities of Israel is not ■■■ hating.

1 Like

I ignore topics that I think are stupid…:man_shrugging:

But what if they are to blame? Do you have proof that they aren’t because we have proof that they are. Let’s start with over-representation in the media. Kinda crazy for only 2% of the US population - right? Can you dismiss this as coincidence? Provide proof or STFU and GTFO.

4 Likes

I have read the entire thread. What point are you trying make? That the shit that I described is acceptable to the Mods? If that is the case, at least its good to finally get it on paper.

If that were true, you wouldn’t be here.

Do you think that constitutes some sort of proof?

See @Tyfoon, this is the kind of shit that passes as evidence in this Forum.

Indeed. They are! Glad you finally arrived at the conclusion we have all reached some time ago. Here is Barbara Lerner Specter in her own words. Did she not say these things? Did she not say that ■■■■ would be at the center of the destruction of a majority white Europe and will be resented for their lead role in making Europe multicultural? Show me where she didn’t say it. Here is the video. I’ll wait.

2 Likes

Not necessarily, but when you and your ilk bring it up in virtually every thread you participate in, it certainly leans that way.

@Tyfoon … Is not editing of a post to change the meaning and then respond as though I had actually said what they changed it to?

My ability to flag seems to have been curtailed or I would have done so.

For starters, the post does not violate our rules. So there is that.

But I’ll play along.

What is your issue with what he posted, specifically? It isn’t a secret that ■■■■■■ people are heavily involved in the news media and Hollywood, is it? Is this somehow shocking or controversial to talk about their representation in these industries? I don’t think it is. Why do you? Why would discussion of such a thing be forbidden? Please explain.

5 Likes

I bet he doesn’t answer. I know the answer, but I will wait to post it.

First off, I did NOT say that there was any rule broken by the post. That is not the issue. Look at the edited post of mine that it is in response to. It does not in anyway support the notion that ■■■■ are to blame for anything. A very large segment of the white population have ■■■■■■ genetic roots. To imply that these people pictured, who allegedly have some ■■■■■■ roots, somehow represent a ■■■■■■ conspiracy to take over is so pathetically absurd that is deserves nothing but derision. Yet that is the kind of “proof” that is offered up continually in these forums. How is a person supposed to respond to that? Do you expect us to go person by person through that list and find some sort of evidence showing that none of them are involved in a ■■■■■■ conspiracy? Have you ever tried to find evidence to prove a negative?

Of course I would be, I’m here now, and you can find a whole host of threads and topics that I don’t participate in. If something has your panties in such a wad, I suggest you do the same…:man_shrugging: