He most certainly did! He took the phrase “the ■■■■ are to blame” (which were in quotes signifying that they were not actually my words) out of the sentence “You can hardly find a thread in these forums with more then 50 posts that doesn’t have several telling us all that “the ■■■■ are to blame.” " and then used that statement to make the false statement “Indeed. They are! Glad you finally arrived at the conclusion we have all reached some time ago.”
And whether he was being facetious or not should not matter. I did not agree with him and he knew it. Nearly any post that anyone makes could be similarly edited to change meaning. It should not be incumbent on any of us to be careful how we say things just so such devious dishonest responses are not possible. And we certainly should not have to rely on other readers clicking on the arrow to see the entirety of our posts. That’s ridiculous. If that sort of activity is acceptable to this Forum, it is just one more black mark against it.
I think your statement says and proves you are mentally challenged!
The Epstein thread is not in the conspiracy category, it’s in the the Law and Order category specifically for a reason, to discuss the particulars about him and the legalities of his case! Not to talk about your dumbass anti ■■■■■■ conspiracy theories! If you interject a topic not related to the OP, that is by definition trying to derail a thread topic, why you can’t get that through your thick head is suggestive that you may have a serious comprehension deficiency.
Also this goes back to the original topic of this thread where Typhoon was kindly asking you to focus on writing more descriptions in your opening of thread topics you create. Instead of saying “ok sure I will try better” you have to argue about it then post the same crap in the Epstein thread.
Magog is the same way in terms of being thick headed, disrespectful of observing boundaries and not very diverse in the topics you two discuss and for various reasons I believe you and him are the same people!
Because when a thread is suspected as being a violation of the rules, the correct response is to report it, not respond to it. But since it was based on a falsehood (my alleged agreement with you) it was not worthy of a response anyway. Or so I am told by a lot of you in this thread.
What’s the big deal? I was just accused of defending “luciferians with ■■■■■■ names” who are “pedophiles or war mongers, liars and murderers.” You don’t think that’s a big deal?
The quote directs back to your statement, which was not altered. Your words were used, just not in the context you wanted them to be used in. It’s juvenile and will be addressed, but it isn’t the end of the world and everyone can still see your post.
My preference is for self-imposed exile. Judging by the emotional outbursts in this thread, we aren’t far off from that happening. They don’t deserve the satisfaction of a ban.
It’s also not our decision to make. We shouldn’t behave poorly and make demands as they have done. It’s not in good form. They are the ones struggling to keep their emotions in check, not us.
They are in the process of flaming out. Let it take it’s course.
