Germany Significantly Increases Military Spending

Ever hear of NATO?

Article 5 was invoked for the war in Afghanistan dumbass.

Right.
NATO is NOT in the interest of the Europeans.
NATO is nothing but their liability.

Who do you think is laughing all the way to the bank?

What a bunch of crap.

It has prevented the Russians from absorbing Western Europe since the end of WWII beginning with it’s creation.

It’s also allowed most of the members to avoid the danger and expense of developing their own Nukes and advanced systems because the US and UK did so at their own expense and protect the rest of NATO with them.

You are out of your damned mind spouting complete bullshit again.

The Soviet Union was controlled by the Rockefellers.
FDR, a communist, gave the nuke secrets to the communists during WWII.
https://www.abebooks.com/book-search/title/major-jordan's-diaries/
image

What about all the theatrics of Skripal poisoning, shooting down of Malaysian MH17 by the Ukrainian jet (putting the blame of Putin), etc., etc.

Yep, I wonder where the double-agent traitor is now, and if his daughter’s tracheotomy scar has healed so well that it’s no longer visible? What a bloody pantomime it all was, but how soon forgotten??

Whatever Germany failed to put into their own defense translated to their own unpreparedness for an eventual conflict with Russia, it doesn’t mean that they weren’t paying their own bills…

The US chose to be an occupying force along with France, the UK and the Soviet Union.

After World War II the responsibility for the security of Germany as a whole rested with the four Allied Powers: the United States, the United Kingdom, France and the Soviet Union. Germany had been without armed forces since the Wehrmacht was dissolved following World War II. When the Federal Republic of Germany was founded in 1949, it was without a military. Germany remained completely demilitarized and any plans for a German military were forbidden by Allied regulations.

Germans are slow learners.

Millions of Germans were starved to death after WWII ended. The US was never a benevolent occupier of the country.

image

The plan to destroy Germany and annihilate Germans goes back hundreds of years. Now being executed by immigration.

Which NATO still hasn’t won nor does it show any signs of doing so in the foreseeable future. If the Russians couldn’t tame the Taliban I’m fucking sure we can’t. As per bloody usual the Talibs are rrunning rings around the US, and the souks are probably chock-full of American hardware for sale at knock-down prices. And evidently the US peace initiative of a few weeks ago didn’t last very long? They’re laughing their heads off at you: in the movie Bitter Lake, even the Afghan kids were laughing at you behind your back. ‘America - land of the dumb’

Germans may be slow learners, but Americans never learn.

That’s a lie of course. The occupation of Germany ended in 1955.

Allied forces remained in Germany strictly at the invitation and request of the German Gov’t largely to prevent the Soviets from absorbing all of Germany and it’s resources.

If not for the US presence in Post War Western Europe the Soviets would have conquered it entirely by 1950.

Lol, are you an American.

Wining was never NATO’s objective, simply supporting US operations.

Obama squandered our victory in Afghanistan and the public is fed up with supporting a war with no foreseeable end or end game so all that’s left is figuring out how to leave with the least possible damage.

Hopefully when we have to return, and we will at some point we will have learned our lesson and we will utterly destroy the Taliban and all of it’s supporters and affiliates.

Well that’s just yet another lie but that’s to be expected from you.

Everything that the west has done in the ME the past two decades has been failure.

1 Like

The smart money says don’t go to these shitbucket regions in the first place. To be humiliated once is bad enough, but to keep going back for more is nothing short of stupid. Now you’ve been humiliated yet again by the Taliban breaking your peace agreement; that lasted about 3 days didn’t it?

1 Like

So you’re admitting America didn’t learn any lesson. LOL
The Taliban got stronger because of what America has been doing: killing of the innocent.

I keep telling him to watch Bitter Lake to educate himself on the subject but he calls it ‘a Youtube video’. :roll_eyes:

Humiliated? If you go in to win you won’t be humiliated.

In case you have forgotten, we didn’t start that fight, Bin Laden and The Taliban did.

As for the Taliban, they humiliated themselves, not us by failing to keep their agreement.

We had a win by any definition until Obama decided to squander it to appease the anti war left in the US and around the world.

That is easily correctible in the future but the public is going to have to demand it and hopefully when that time comes we have a POTUS that understands you don’t go to war to play for a tie, you go in and utterly destroy the enemy’s means and will to continue the fight by killing every one of them that can be found and destroying everything they have.

If you support the enemy you are not innocent.

Like the people who get together for the wedding of their relatives and get blasted out of existence by a missile from a drone operated by a guy sitting in an airconditioned room with a mug of coffee continents away.