That’s exactly right. The only viable defense against a criminal with a firearm is a good guy (or gal) with a firearm…preferably bigger. If the crime victim has to wait on a good guy with a gun (the armed LEO) to arrive after being advised of the crime…which may have included murder by firearm. I just love reading news of an armed criminal being shot to death in self defense after firing on a GGWG. It pleases me also when an attempted crime is averted by an armed citizen without a shot being fired.
What the liberal numbnuts don’t want to address is the rampant gun violence in liberal enclaves that already have the most strict gun laws in the nation. Chicago black on black killings come to mind.
Oh, gun control is a conspiracy alright. It’s a conspiracy to disarm law abiding citizens and let the criminals prevail. That way the criminals will vote for the assholes that enabled them to prevail in gun free zones.
Social scientists have no need of knowing just how many guns there are in any state or any community.
One thing they can be sure of: In Kennesaw, Georgia, every household is required by law to have a working firearm. The crime rate in Kennesaw is among the lowest in the nation.
The odds are far, far greater that you will use your gun to put an end to your humiliations, rather than Rambo yourself out of a confrontation with someone determined to hurt you.
I can understand that you don’t appreciate probability, but there it is.
Every human action has a probability. Probabilities follow bell curves. The probability of my committing suicide is near zero. The probability of my killing a criminal if confronted while I’m armed is much higher.
Apparently you just THINK you understand any facet of my appreciations.
You’re what I label as a fucking loon…amusing but not worthy of emulation.
