Children as young as 6 to be given ‘compulsory self-touching lessons’ in the UK

This bit of news was originally billed as not being an onion piece! This is pretty crazy and have to seriously inquire who was behind this concept! How is this not encouraging pedo behaviour? This is outrageous plain and simple, and I have to ask has the UK lost their collective minds by allowing this craziness? WTF?

1 Like

Why aren’t there riots yet?

2 Likes

Geeze, at that age they should be learning to read Dr. Seuss and wondering what kind of cookies should be put out for Santa Clause.

What purpose is this to serve? According to the co-author of “All About Me” Jonny Hunt:

Hunt insisted that the concept of “self-stimulation or self-soothing” was “not sex education but actually information around safe and appropriate touching.”

I think parents can handle teaching their children about safe and appropriate touching. The self touching being tagged onto a safety lesson is just about perversion, IMO.

1 Like

Innocence is short lived; so why would some degenerate wish to make it shorter? Sooner or later you become aware of your body; but usually by then, some maturity has been gained.

1 Like

The only people who are going to protest against this will be the Muslims. Just wait and see. This will then put the extreme left and odds with one of their favorite pet groups.

1 Like

So very true. I feel so sorry for kids these days.

1 Like

We have now entered the phase of societal collapse where the state mandates child grooming on the path to the normalization of pedophilia. It’s coming.

1 Like

It’s known as Creeping Gradualism.

1 Like

Luke 17:2 "It would be better for him if a millstone were hung around his neck and he were thrown into the sea, than that he would cause one of these little ones to stumble. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- The teaching & wisdom of Christ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Islam has a different view. But then they go by the teachings of Moe the pedophile.

1 Like

24.Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them “censorship” and a violation of free speech and free press.

  1. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio and TV.

  2. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as “normal, natural and healthy.”

This is the Gramscian agenda of the “long march through the institutions” spelled out explicitly: gradual takeover of the “means of communication” and then using those vehicles to debauch the culture and weaken the will of the individual to resist.

Today those few who still have the courage to advocate public morality are denounced and viciously attacked. Most Americans are entirely unwitting regarding the motives behind this agenda.

  1. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with “social” religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity, which does not need a “religious crutch.”

This has been largely accomplished through the communist infiltration of the National Council of Churches, Conservative and Reform Judaism, and the Catholic seminaries.

I await evidence that the extreme left will find this vile development objectionable.

Don’t hold your breath. :wink:

1 Like

I call them Gateway Laws.

The libs on another forum argue (the below posted) is fine. No issues with it. Because women in NYC and Main have had the freedom and you see no one walking around topless. And beside, what parent would really allow their daughter to do so.

The cognitive dissonance is truly amazing. Women do not equal children. Children are vulnerable and need to be protected, not exploited.

1 Like

This used to be called perversion. Now it’s called “diversity”, under the banner of rainbow flag tyranny.

3 Likes

Parents should just start calling the police to report a sexual assault in progress.

1 Like

If boys can walk around shirtless, as long as a girl looks indistinguishable from a boy, then they should be allowed, subject to Parental judgment, to also walk around shirtless.

But the culture should not be made coarser or more common or uglier or more dangerous .

It is too bad that Liberals generally lack the judgment to decide these things.

The law overrules parental judgment. What can you do as a parent if you prohibit your daughter but the law is on her side?

The earliest physical change of puberty for girls is usually breast development, which most often begins around 10 or 11 years. But it’s perfectly normal for breast development to start anytime between the ages of 7 and 13. A girl’s first menstrual period usually happens about 2 to 2½ years after breast development begins.

https://kidshealth.org/en/teens/start-developing.html

1 Like

I just noticed…

Call this “Corgi” Popeye.

I’m not asking you to answer. But the thing for me really is…what is a parent to do when the law is on the side of the child? What happens when the law usurps parenthood?

1 Like
  1. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce.
  2. Emphasize the need to raise children away from the negative influence of parents. Attribute prejudices, mental blocks and retarding of children to suppressive influence of parents.

image