Yeah, and look how Julian Assange is discovering ‘the cost of speaking out’? What breath-taking HYPOCRISY!
1 Like
A great break down of what the liberal media is doing and what their motives are! Proof positive how some here are ignorant of the details!
The activity of the “ small group ” of coup plotters consists of three generalized subsidiary agencies: (1) DOJ/FBI, (2) CIA/ODNI, and (3) The State Department.
Within each “ small group faction” a years-long review of their narrative constructs shows the groups have specific and unique media outlets for their offensive (’16, ’17) and defensive (’18, ’19) propaganda efforts.
•The DOJ/FBI faction of the “small group” leaks to narrative engineers at the New York Times and NBC. •The CIA/ODNI faction utilize the Washington Post and ABC; and •the State Dept. faction use CNN and CBS. Each faction uses the same reporters & pundits for their distribution. This pattern, albeit generalized, has been consistent for several years.
The originating media entity -utilizing the leaks, opinions and agenda of the faction most concerned- starts the process. The secondary media groups come in for support – reporting on the reporting; and then reporting on the reporting of the reporting… and so on. This process provides a concentric distribution effort to bolster the originating premise.
Similar to the Journ-o-list effort of Ezra Klein, all of the ideologically aligned reporters share information for the larger process of defending the prior activity and advancing a unified narrative. [Reference Buzzfeed’s Ali Watkins sharing leaks from SSCI Security Director James Wolfe to her peers at WaPo and New York Times while she had sex with the source to keep the information pipeline open.]
It is important to remember this concerted process whenever we are reviewing media articles concerning the matters of interest to each of the “small group” factions.
In essence, the propagandists within the media are the same; and the sources for the positions reflected in the articles are the same. Wash, rinse and repeat depending on the identified risk.
So today we see NBC and the [New York Times]going “out front” on behalf of their interests. Referencing the faction each outlet represents we see the reporting is to defend the interests of the DOJ and FBI.
The first “small group” report is from NBC. Toplines :
- The Durham investigation is more broad and therefore more troubling.
- Durham is moving to interview current/former CIA and current/former Intelligence Community operatives.
- The CIA and Intelligence Community operatives are hiring lawyers prior to speaking to Durham.
- The Durham investigation appears again looking at the ICA (Intelligence Community Assessment); which again is the part of Small Group operation which constructed the ‘vast Russian conspiracy’ (election interference) narrative.
- The Small Group is worried the investigation has now shifted into a possible criminal probe.
- The Small Group members themselves have NOT been questioned. This is making them nervous; hence the reporting.
- Barr and Durham visiting Italy, the U.K. and Australia to speak with Mifsud, Halper and Downer respectively is really making the Small Group nervous.
Here’s the key NBC paragraphs, emphasis mine:
(Via NBC) A review launched by Attorney General William Barr into the origins of the Russia investigation has expanded significantly amid concerns about whether the probe has any legal or factual basis, multiple current and former officials told NBC News.
[The “multiple current and former officials” are members of the small group. Based on the outlet and the material, these members are DOJ and FBI officials].
The prosecutor conducting the review, Connecticut U.S. Attorney John Durham, has expressed his intent to interview a number of current and former intelligence officials involved in examining Russia’s effort to interfere in the 2016 presidential election, including former CIA Director John Brennan and former director of national intelligence James Clapper , Brennan told NBC News.
Durham has also requested to talk to CIA analysts involved in the intelligence assessment of Russia’s activities, prompting some of them to hire lawyers , according to three former CIA officials familiar with the matter. And there is tension between the CIA and the Justice Department over what classified documents Durham can examine, two people familiar with the matter said.
[Here we see Durham doing what we suspected five months ago. {Go Deep} Durham is looking at who put together the December 2016, Joint Analysis Report (JAR); and the January 2017, Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA); essentially the originating documents that promoted the vast Russian conspiracy and set the cornerstone for a special counsel investigation therein.]
With Barr’s approval, Durham has expanded his staff and the timeframe under scrutiny, according to a law enforcement official directly familiar with the matter.
[This is common sense. If the ICA is a false political document, then guess what? Yep, the entire narrative from the JAR and ICAis part of a big fraud (it is). Then the construct of the special counsel probe (remember the “originating” construct), was false. (it was)]
[…] If Durham is conducting a criminal investigation , it’s not clear what allegations of wrongdoing are being examined. The Justice Department has not detailed any, and a spokeswoman declined to comment for this story.
“I don’t know what the legal basis for this is,” Brennan said , calling the probe “bizarre.”
[…] Justice Department officials have said that Durham has found something significant , and that critics should be careful.
[…] Skeptics who have been trying to track Durham’s movements say he has yet to interview key figures, including former deputy FBI director Andrew McCabe, former FBI agent Peter Stzrok and former FBI general counsel James Baker.
[“skeptics”? Who are they? …and why are they “trying to track Durham’s movements”?]
“Nobody who knows anything has been interviewed,” said a person in touch with those former officials .
[So the group is talking to themselves and using a third party to push their collective discussion into the media. Important to note.]
[…] A Western intelligence official familiar with what Durham has been asking of foreign officials says his inquiries track closely with the questions raised about the Russia investigation in right-wing media.
[So some entity in the intelligence community, likely outside the U.S. , is in contact with the small group and keeping them apprised of what Durham is doing? Interesting. Pay attention to what NBC is admitting here… Corrupt officials, co-conspirators, within the intelligence apparatus are monitoring John Durham; relaying information back to their allies; who then talk among themselves and coordinate media leaks based on the information they are able to extract from the tracking. That’s a big admission.]
[…] The Senate intelligence committee examined the allegations about Downer, Mifsud and Halper, as part of its bipartisan investigation into the intelligence community’s assessment that Russia was responsible for attacking the 2016 election, and found nothing to substantiate any wrongdoing, a committee aide said. (read full article)
[Again, notice how the small group is utilizing the SSCI, and it is a committee aide within the SSCI that is leaking to NBC. We already know the SSCI was completely compromised by the effort to remove President Trump from office. {Go Deep} Part of that SSCI effort led to the discovery of SSCI Security Director James Wolfe leaking the FISA application to the media. The SSCI was/is part of the coup/impeachment effort.]
Courtesy - Sundance from the CTH
Trump has to be impeached for his own ‘this for that’
Trolling the threads are you now?
Leave no thread untouched by derailment.
1 Like
Further proof that the house of cards is about to go up in smoke!
NBC and all legacy media is burying this story! Geez I wonder why? (Sarcasm)
If so, then that would explain why Giuliani slinked back into the shadows following the arrest of his two clients. We haven’t heard hide nor hair of him since, and now we learn that he’s lawyering up…
It’s official - the Durham Probe is now a criminal inquiry. I hope these sh!tlibs get roasted!
http://archive.fo/OFDKo
1 Like
Yep! I have to suspect with all the impeachment talk and the closed door nonsense with Adam Schiff, Nutty Nancy, whether or not they are just flat out desperate for anything knowing perfectly well the doors are closing in on them! We are seeing stories breaks with Democratic Congresswomen with inappropriate behavior, and then another one shortly foolwing that, then before that the one that pleaded guilty over Campaign fraud, something I posted a separate thread about a few days ago.
here
Now this from CNN, the deep state go to, is hilarious to watch.
Quoting Sundance from the CTH
"When Weissman and Mueller were traveling the world to investigate Trump-Russia it was an example of prudent and thorough investigative approaches. However, Durham and Barr doing the same thing is an example of the most horrific investigation imaginable. When Mueller sent a subpoena it held a seriousness that could not be ignored; however, if Durham sends a subpoena, everyone can just shrug-it-off and “take the fifth”.
Accordingly, Weissmann & Mueller opened investigations, the targets were automatically guilty and should be alarmed. However, when Durham & Barr open investigations, it means nothing to the targets and not even the possibility of guilt. Meanwhile, former ODNI James Clapper’s muttering responses are, well, also quite humorous."
All corruption, treason, usurpation must be rooted out. We have to win in 2020.
Now everyone can see why the NYC Bar Association was telling Barr to recuse himself. They are shills for the Democrats and they know their Democrat masters are gonna get charged with crimes.
If anyone here thinks that the people actually responsible for all of this crap will be held to account, you’re living in la-la-land.
There will be fall guys and patsies but anyone actually important, all of the big names that we know were in on it? They will skate through like they always do to cushy job as correspondents, book deals, and speaking tours.
Nothing is going to happen because this is all an attempt by the administration to cover-up their own crimes and deflect fake blame onto Democrats who literally did nothing wrong.
1 Like
This was an investigation that suddenly turned into a criminal probe, if it wasn’t a big deal CNN wouldn’t be trying to spin it by putting their partisan hack Tobin to put forth such narratives of pleading the 5th. The IG report was also delayed for measured effect for timing! Some big names are going down, mark my words! It may not be Hillary or Obama but everybody else I will take, including some members of the house!
If I had to guess who were the ones not smart enough to cover their tracks, it would be Brennan and Susan Rice. Clapper doesn’t look like a guy who’s very clever, either, but I get the sense he was an inert bystander. Rice probably was just a stooge, but she’s shown that she’d do anything she’s told to do, no matter how stupid.
Well thanks for pointing out the obvious.
Well you pretty much are hitting on the trifecta. Remember Brennen and Clapper already lied under oath, and Rice along with Samantha Powers are also liars who will have some explaining to do with all the unauthuorized unmasking that was being done under their names, and there were a lot of them. People don’t realize how much unmasking was being done until Admiral Rogers had it shut down, it was off the charts, so I am can say for certain that Susan Rice might be a small pawn, but she could be in legal jeopardy along with Powers. Brennen and Clapper for sure are going to be facing charges, and Comey? Funny how he has been ominously silent these last few weeks after it was revealed recently they found an entire folder DOC in Comey’s safe shortly after he was fired and his office was raided turning up FISA warrants and surveillance materials relating to Trump’s Campaign. I am not sure how nobody can not be charged given what are already established facts of crimes already committed. The country won’t survive if no one is charged and people walk from this.