MAD, mutually assured destruction, when the Helicopter Fodder and the US in the 1950s didnt nuke eachother, they knew theyd get destroyed by the other, thats whats stopping them, a nuke could take both of them out and they know it.
Iāve read some from Marx and I always go back to Reaganās statement. "Do you know how to tell a Communist? Well, heās the guy that reads Marx. How do you tell an anti-communist? Well, heās the guy that UNDERSTANDS Marx. "
Exactly what you suggest is what the founders had in mind, with one exception. Limited government that is necessary to the health of a free nation. They could have taken it to the level youāre talking about but fortunately, they gave government some power to fund infrastructure, fund defense and to make laws to protect me from you and you from me. Survival of the fittest or best armed is no way to live in my opinion.
Funny story. My neighbor at one point was a major prepper. He had 12 months of food stored, a generator with a nice stockpile of fuel and ways to produce energy if the system collapsed. He was oddly enough anti-gun and was vocal about it. One day, he was asking why I didnāt think it was necessary to have more than a yearās worth of food and I replied āWell, you have plenty and I have lots of guns and ammoā¦ if SHTF, Iāll come take yours.ā Two weeks later, he and his wife asked me to train them with firearms and to help them buy the appropriate ones for self defense. Now, heās an addict and we go to the range at least once a month. 
2 Likes
The only thing that keeps the Amish safe is the US Military.
1 Like
Yeah, why would people buy that Snake oil though, if they know its killed people and not even like Drugs where it has a high. Whod buy that. Regulations are also easily used to destroy the free market.
Exactly how do you suggest a community gather and build a nuke? Who controls the button? Is it shared? Sounds like a really bad idea to me. 
The issue isnāt them knowing and refusing to buy it, the issue is being told itās great, then it ends up harming people. How many companies have been sued out of existence because they made a product that harmed their customers? I like that check and balance.
Anyway, Iām old and I have to get up early tomorrow so Iāll catch you on the flip side. 
Yeah, its pretty easy to understand Marx, listen to a baby spattering nonsense. I believe Private Businesses could handle infrastructure.
I have a Sad/Funny Story. I am a massive Gun Rights dude, and I was in a School shooting ( I decided to protect the girl I loved at the time, ( She went back to her Abusive Ex, made me sad ) ). When I tell people why I am still Gun Rights and even more extreme, its because if we had a 1911 in the classroom the shooter wouldnt stand a chance.
No, id say its Mutually Assured Destruction, I have seen some Amish before and they are pretty well built. No, Nukes are Privatized, but a smart man knows a threat to his home and a Nuke is a good threat. Yeah, but what about word of mouth, especially with the Internet, word of the products side effects means theyd be dead as doorknobs as a company. See you man, youre alright.
Anarchy and capitalism are a contradiction in terms. Anarchy had been debunked repeatedly.
- i disagree, while historically Socialist, Anarchy also fits Capitalism ( Actual Capitalism, not this Corporatist Crap like Amazon ), meaning Unregulated Free Trade. 2. Thats because we didnt have Nukes, MAD mutually assured destruction.
YOU donāt have nukes and in a total state of anarchy YOU wouldnāt have the capital to privately purchase and sustain nuclear weapons - Amazon would though. I hope you like renting your property from Jeff Bezos and paying his warlords 50-90% tax on your income.
Jeff Bezos isnt even a Capitalist, but a corporatist, who destroys Free Markets via Regulation via the State. Also, if that where true, nothing is stopping me from moving and the Landlord has to have a good product for consumers to buy it and I dont believe Consumers would buy that.
I get that ownership of recreational nuclear weapons does not imply use; however, would there be any way to regulate me from arming it and launching?
No regulation, but MAD Mutually Assured Destruction, thats why Helicopter Fodder and the US didnt Nuke eachother.
This concept falls on its face though because the people who own the weapons will also control the territory. We already have that.
We could also revolt against the government, the government cant use a nuke because it would make his approval ratings drop immensely. We take the weapons and build up Ancapistan.
That would violate the NAP.
They have already violated the NAP, many times the state, we can do whatever tactic and what we need to destroy the state because of the multiple NAP violations.
Yeah - let me know how fighting the entire US military on your own works out for you.