Apparently, you either did not notice or do not comprehend that I placed my belief in a large military in a separate paragraph after stating that I do not claim any party but lean toward being a Libertarian. I did not claim that a diminished military is a Libertarian tenet. It may be or not. I believe in a kick-ass military whether or not the Libertarians do.
I believe my position on that is no different from your previous statement as described directly below:
And now back to the topic at hand:
Your claim of knowledge that I am not a white nationalist or racist cannot logically have come from my never having given you inclination to believe such. Think about that.
Anarchy is stupid at any level. Even at the family level, someone needs to govern the behavior of the members thereof, especially of unruly, uneducated, children who enjoy doing as the please regardless of its correctness or acceptability.
All presumptions on your part. You have no proof that cartels would be destroyed. You have no justification to say that crime would be opposed at all. According to the true definition of anarchy, there is no crime because there is no government to define such. Anarchy is the absence of law and order.
I brought it up because you expressed it and I disagree with it. That’s essentially what debate is all about. I did not insult your ideology. I may have insulted you or hurt your wittle feewings, but that is simply tough fuckin’ shit. Get over it!
Anarchy sucks!
Capitalism and liberty protected under limited government by a democratic republic within its own borders ROCKS!