No, I am not a Methhead or a Bureaucrat, I am a man that reads too much.
Whered I go, Rojavas Socialist, I am an Anarcho Capitalist. The previous attempts have left Bullet Holes in my ideological constituents and I want to free my family, my friends, etc.
I like that name, Dirty Hegel. Take it as a nickname
Hegel was a Freemason, if it means anything.
The Freemasons are just a bunch of guys who help the community, I dont mind. Let me guess they control the world?
My knowledge is second-hand.
Virtually all monarchs in Europe and Asia, US Presidents (except Reagan, donât know about Obama and Trump), and big names in banking.
One thing for certain, power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
And it doesnât matter what party is in control including your fav.
I dont have a favorite party, just sympathies.
1 Like
You seem to have a sense of humor, so Iâll just assume that you donât know what fedposting is. Itâs making serious threats that would get the authorities to give the owner of this website trouble.
There are enough malicious liberals out there who cause trouble for @Patriot. Please donât facilitate that.
1 Like
Ill hammer down on the threats, but I believe what I want to do is perfectly reasonable. I would rather have a peaceful way, but I am being realistic.
You language has been very decent and I like it.
I have had friends who want anarchism, but it all depends on the definitions of government, governance and governing body.
A family unit is a self-governing body and you canât abolish that. (Thatâs what the New World Order is all about)
Thank you for the compliment. Most Anarchists are simply children who dont want the responsibilities of modern society, like Trade, Taxes, etc. I find some ideas morally bankrupt like Taxes, politicians, etc and see other ways around it. Like Community and the nuclear family structure as a concept for order, Anarchism as a way to keep rights, and Capitalism for a Voluntary yet productive society. I am not a madman or a methhead as people think I am, I know that when push comes to shove revolution has to happen, I am just not blind to it. Thanks again for the compliment.
They ALWAYS think cops and the military will be on THEIR side.
Did you see how Texas (yep, TEXAS) cops went and confiscated guns from Trumpers in a bar in west TexasâŚ
Yes. Thats a fault with Conservatives, they donât realize theyre also a duck in the pond. I am just a very aggressive duck fighting for my rights, but somehow I am a MethHead and Immature when all I am is not blind in one eye. See the problem with american politics is that they think that eagle is on theyre side. But it isnt, the Eagle is on the states side.
Itâs a problem with all partisansâŚ
Yes, everyone thinks theyre gonna be saved at the end of the day by a hand in the sky. The hand either strangles you, lifts you up to ruin youre life later, or take money from youre pocket.
1 Like
Looks like your ANCAP society is coming to life as we speak in Minneapolis.
Riots are violations of the NAP you know and why riot in a place with security, freedom and family? It isnt Ancapistan but the start of it.
Apparently, you either did not notice or do not comprehend that I placed my belief in a large military in a separate paragraph after stating that I do not claim any party but lean toward being a Libertarian. I did not claim that a diminished military is a Libertarian tenet. It may be or not. I believe in a kick-ass military whether or not the Libertarians do.
I believe my position on that is no different from your previous statement as described directly below:
And now back to the topic at hand:
Your claim of knowledge that I am not a white nationalist or racist cannot logically have come from my never having given you inclination to believe such. Think about that.
Anarchy is stupid at any level. Even at the family level, someone needs to govern the behavior of the members thereof, especially of unruly, uneducated, children who enjoy doing as the please regardless of its correctness or acceptability.
All presumptions on your part. You have no proof that cartels would be destroyed. You have no justification to say that crime would be opposed at all. According to the true definition of anarchy, there is no crime because there is no government to define such. Anarchy is the absence of law and order.
I brought it up because you expressed it and I disagree with it. Thatâs essentially what debate is all about. I did not insult your ideology. I may have insulted you or hurt your wittle feewings, but that is simply tough fuckinâ shit. Get over it!
Anarchy sucks!
Capitalism and liberty protected under limited government by a democratic republic within its own borders ROCKS!
- Fair. 2. No, you gave me no reason to believe you where a white nationalist, never said a racial slur, doesnt think âThemâ control the government like I have seen in some interesting threads before, there is a type and from what I examine from you. You dont fit the profile. 3. You realize Anarchy isnt just Chaos, its a society without a government, there can still be a man of the house and should, Right wing Anarchist society is dependent on that. Read Hans Herman Hoppe. 4. Why would there be Cartels since anyone can get theyre hands on Cocaine without worrying about law enforcement, most âcriminalsâ are there for buying or selling drugs, I believe 84%. Also why would someone mug me if I have a missile launcher strapped to my back? 5. You didnt hurt my feelings at all, I dont care, I was curious about youre disdain of Anarchism. I have a question, examine history in a government society, doesnt it always exert more power through the years like in America, and show small government is destined to be bloated?