MAGA is definitely a cult. They way that his supporters believe anything trump says without hesitation and research themselves. They do what he tells them to do. Sounds a lot like sheeps to me
2 Likes
You donāt know shit, and you already proved that, so go back to your armchair cuck and STFU!
All talk no evidence. Nothing sane, only calling names. Nothing political is coming from you at all. Get off a political forum, if you have nothing political to say. Youāre an embarrassment.
Mr madhatten here really loves to sound intelligent but he is in fact dumb as a brick wall (sorry for coming down to your level, but since you donāt want to be political neither will I)
1 Like
Frame him in messiah like terms, and claiming he was sent by godā¦he knew he was going into the vipers den, but he did it for usā¦
and garbage like thatā¦
Where is your evidence? You just another Asstard making baseless accusations who simply throws stones while living in a glass house, then pivots when challenged to defend his position. Here you are again screaming like a little whiny bitch claiming victim status. Typical European liberal cuck as usual canāt practice what they preach but is always first to point the finger! Now fk off hypocrite!
My evidence is you, my evidence is my observations on the MAGA people, you definitely are a cult, just take a look? EVERYTHING trump says is being preached?
1 Like
Thatās it, post after post that doesnāt speak to the topic at all, but just insults another poster, yet heās the first one to tag tyfoon crying that someone else is off topic or derailing his threadā¦
The truth is, there is no free speech problem in America as the op claims. There is no suppression of speech by our government, that is protected by the first amendment. There are however free and private companies that use to enjoy the support of the right to do as they please. But then the right here doesnāt even believe in states rights any longer either. Times are changingā¦
Yeah ok! (Sarcasm) More observations based on emotions than cognizable actual facts. I am willing to bet you were also against BREXIT too which is more of the same. Trying to advocate a false premise along an altruistic argument. You limp wristed morons love your chains than to understand nor defend what individual freedoms actually mean. Typical and you just proved what a sheep looks like!
Oh āsocialism Capitalist society is the answerā blah, blah, blah nonsense.
Yes a socialistic capitalism model with a free marked would solve a lot of Americaās problems. itās not going to happen, that is obvious, but it would definitely help. In response to brexit I had no opinion on it. They wanted to quit the EU because of the ever demanding quotas on how many immigrants they had to take from Syria and Yemen. Itās their decision it will both have positive and negative effects for them.
Why donāt you just admit you love getting fked in the ass and spare us the emotional diatribe of extolling the nonsense of how great socialism is? You are ever the cucked sheep who needs government to take care of you argument is the same that fell to genocide and were extinguished because trusting such a foolish false sense of security worked so well in past. No thank you! Those who learn from history are not doomed to repeat it again but you will, so stop trying to convince us in the US of joining your sinking ship and worry about your own country first! You are not a citizen of mine, you donāt pay taxes in my country nor vote so your opinion on the matter means absolutely zero!
You say Iām emotional, and yet it is you who screams on the internet at someone with a different opinion than me. The only thing Iām saying is the US needs better distribution of the wealth in the country.
1 Like
Yeah here you are again trying to pivot and deflect again and make it about someone else! Your projection never ceases to amuse me! Nice try! Try again!
Why are you here? You always go on foreign sites telling them how they should run their countries? I bet you wouldnāt have the balls to say it in person as you hide behind your VPN huh? Hence your moniker the āinvisiblepussyā 
How did I deflect?
And second. America is filling up the global image. The US has a lot of power both military and political.
But at the same time I canāt stop wondering about the crippling problems the US is facing especially in the last year. Iām free to engage in the US political debate, because changes in the US has effects on EU as well. Therefore political problems in the US can have effects on me as well. Itās a global market.
America is a third world country wearing a Gucci belt.
Right here! You are doing it again by making it about America. Irrelevant!
Did you serve in the US military? Do you have an active security clearance? Nope! You are just some internet jockey opining on something you read as someoneās else opinion that you take as being gospel! Typical liberal!
No it doesnāt and itās really not your concern. You are not a US citizen and donāt vote nor pay US taxes so your opinion on US policy means zero. If you think it has any effect on you then you are not only a liar but woefully misinformed on how things work.
Where did you copy and paste that from? 
I got news for you, coming from a country whose only main export is Oil isnāt any better either so your weak attempt at levity is pathetic. You are pretty funny because you sound like someone with bitter envy than being able to articulate actual policies specifically than trying to pretend you exist on the moral high ground.
Yes market fluctuations in the US has impact on EU as well. That is a well known fact, and of course Iām only talking about America, itās an American political forum, and Norway has not NEARLY the same magnitude of problems as the US. Our problems are paling when compared to the USās
I agree, the MSM who are beyond biased in coverage should be muzzled.
Broadcast networks deliver 92% negative coverage for Trump, 66% positive for Biden: Study
Media have ānever more biasedā than they are now, Media Research Center concludes
By Jennifer Harper- The Washington Times - Tuesday, October 27, 2020
The countryās major broadcast news media outlets have never been more negatively biased against a sitting president than Donald Trump, a conservative media watchdog has concluded in its latest study.
The Media Research Center has tracked broadcast network coverage of President Trump since he took office, finding in previous studies earlier in his term that the tone in reporting has been overwhelmingly negative. That slant in coverage was confirmed in the latest studyreleased Tuesday by the Reston, Va.-based organization.
āFour years ago, the Big Three broadcast evening newscasts tried to destroy Donald Trumpās 2016 presidential campaign with historically negative press coverage. This year, those newscasts are doubling down, with coverage that is even more hostile to the Republican,ā wrote MRC Director of Research Rich Noyes.
Harvard Study: Mainstream Media Is 93 Percent Biased Against Trump
A major Harvard University study has revealed that the mainstream media in the United States is overwhelmingly biased against President Donald Trump.
Researchers at the Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy looked at news coverage from TV and print outlets during Trumpās first 100 days in office
Heatst.comreports: They foundthat the tone of some outlets was negative in as many as 98% of reports, significantly more hostile than the first 100 days of the three previous administrations:
The academics based their study on seven US outlets and three European ones.
In America they analyzed CNN, NBC, CBS, Fox News, the New York Times, the Washington Post and the Wall Street Journal.
They also took into account the BBC, the UKās Financial Times and the German public broadcaster ARD.
Every outlet was negative more often than positive.
Only Fox News, which features some of Trumpās most enthusiastic supporters and is often given special access to the President, even came close to positivity.
Fox was ranked 52% negative and 48% positive.
The study also divided news items across topics. On immigration, healthcare, and Russia, more than 85% of reports were negative.
On the economy, the proportion was more balanced ā 54% negative to 46% positive:
The study highlighted one exception: Trump got overwhelmingly positive coverage for launching a cruise missile attack on Syria.
Around 80% of all reports were positive about that.
The picture was very different for other recent administrations. The study found that President Obamaās first 100 days got a good write-up overall ā with 59% of reports positive.
Bill Clinton and George W Bush got overall negative coverage, it found, but to a much lesser extent than Trump. Clintonās first 100 days got 40% positivity, while Bushās got 43%:
Trump has repeatedly claimed that his treatment by the media is unprecedented in its hostility.
This study suggests that, at least when it comes to recent history, heās right.
Seems the disinformation is coming from people like YOU!!!
As a side note, labeling pople you disagree with is so left wing and hateful.
It is what is so wrong with this country.
Oh please spare me about stupid market fluctuations bullshit argument! You obviously are clueless about how basic economics work! If you are that stupid to leave yourself vulnerable to US markets due to exposed risk then that is on your bad decisions not on US policy which has nothing to do with you weaker sauce argument of debating US issues!
How does it affect you personally? Because we are no longer wanting to fund your subsidies to an unelected bureaucracy such as the EU? Because we are asking for European countries to pay their fair share of NATO then bitch and moan about our military? Or because we donāt want to be funding another money laundering scheme such as Climate Change hoax? Yeah ok. (Sarcasm) You are clueless to what is really going on! Surf the net some why donāt you because itās obvious you have no idea what you are talking about!
If you going to attempt debating actual US policy it might be a good idea for you to actually do some research then predicating your arguments on more hyperbolic bullshit!
I have to agree here TIC. Religion is attractive to lower intelligence people because it gives them a sense of importance that they lack in their lives and they feel that they are protected by strong leader figures (Trump, Conan Jesus post 2nd coming, etc). Being sheeple is all they are capable of.
I am simply amazed at how those that chose to be without want more without the effort.
They call for higher minimum wage when they are responsible for the low wages in the US, open borders and an unlimited labor supply will tend to depress wages, ECON 101.
Have to ask yourself why would any employer pay a person wrapping hamburgers 15 bucks an hour. All hail automation when it displaces works when they become to expensive
Our Mc Donalds and many fast food restaurants remain drive through only as the owner choses to not employ more people to open the doors.