Why all the lies?

Democrats and others on the left offer three reasons for their opposition to building a wall on America’s southern border.

  1. A wall is ineffective.

  2. A wall is too expensive.

  3. A wall is immoral.

Each one is false, so false as to constitute lies. So, the only question is: Do Democrats and others on the left believe these lies?

This question has plagued me all my life. Leftism is built on lies — and has been since Lenin. That’s why he named the Communist Party’s lying newspaper “Pravda” (“truth”).

Did my left-wing professors at Columbia University really believe the United States and the Soviet Union were equally responsible for the Cold War? Did they really believe one of the most genocidal regimes in history — which butchered tens of millions its own people, starved as many as 4 million Ukrainians, enslaved seven Eastern European countries under totalitarian rule, and created the monstrous North Korean Communist regime — was no more responsible for the Cold War than the United States, the freest country in human history?

Did my left-wing professors really believe men and women are the same except for body parts? And do today’s leftists really believe human beings with double X chromosomes, a vagina, a uterus, ovaries, menstrual periods, and lactating breasts are not necessarily female?

Do leftists really believe that American universities constitute “rape cultures”? If so, why does any left-wing parent send his or her child to college? Would you send your daughter to a place you believe is permeated by rape?

Do leftists really believe that the statement “There is only one race: the human race” is a racist statement? That is the official position of the University of California.

Do leftists really believe that virtually every criticism of former President Barack Obama emanated from racism, that all opposition to lowering college-admission standards for blacks is racist, that all attacks on George Soros are anti-Semitic?

If leftists believe any of the above, let alone all of it, they are deluded people. And the existence of tens of millions of deluded people in a society can only portend catastrophe. If leftists do not believe those claims, they are not deluded; they lie for effect and, therefore, engage in evil. The existence of tens of millions of people consciously committed to lying means society has little hope.

Now to the wall.

Do leftists believe the country cannot afford $5.7 billion? As the Democrats have approved $1.3 billion for border security, the difference is about one-tenth of 1 percent of U.S. federal spending ($4.5 trillion). Democrats and the rest of the Left make this argument. Yet they are the very people who, for more than half a century, have successfully pushed for unprecedented expansion of government spending; the very people who are overwhelmingly responsible for local, state, and federal government debts of such magnitude that they cannot be paid without massive decreases in spending and the likely social disruption they entail. It is not possible these people believe America cannot afford to pay for a wall. They are, therefore, lying when they claim the price tag is too high.

California Democrats have allocated some $77 billion to pay for a high-speed train between San Francisco and Los Angeles that will be ready in 2033 at the earliest. It will undoubtedly rise to more than a hundred billion dollars. And, thanks to the Left and the Democrats, California is spending this money despite being an estimated $2 trillion in debt (between debt and pensions).

The Left says a wall (or steel barrier) would be “ineffective” at preventing illegal immigration. We know it doesn’t believe this, because just five years ago, Speaker Nancy Pelosi supported a bill that required the construction of 700 miles of border fencing. And Senator Chuck Schumer was one among the “Gang of Eight” Republicans and Democrats who also supported 700 miles of fencing at the border. Every Senate Democrat voted for the Gang of Eight Bill, including 36 Democrats who serve in the Senate today.

Do Schumer and Pelosi and all these other Democrats regard fencing as effective but a wall as ineffective? Do Democrats deny that Israel’s barrier has virtually ended Palestinian terrorism? Do they believe Turkey’s just-built 500-mile wall across nearly its entire border with Syria will be ineffective? Do they know about the effective walls/barriers between the Turkish- and Greek-controlled areas in Cyprus; between Hungary and Serbia and Croatia; Morocco and Algeria; India and Pakistan; and elsewhere?

As for the Democrats and others on the left declaring a wall “immoral,” it is difficult to know which is preferable: that they are living in delusion or lying. On what grounds is it “immoral”? They never say.

Is there a Democrat or leftist who regards walls or other physical barriers surrounding homes or communities as immoral? One doubts it. For one thing, many of them live behind a physical barrier. So, then, why isn’t a physical barrier that protects America equally moral? The only possible answers are that these people don’t really regard America as their home or they are lying about a wall being immoral.

So why all the lies?

Because lies are effective in achieving left-wing goals. There are people in every political, social, and religious group who lie. And there are people within every one of those groups who are truth tellers. But — and this is a “but” whose significance cannot be overstated — while truth is a liberal value and truth is a conservative value, truth has never been a leftist value. For the Left, there is always something more important. In this case, it is the humiliation of the president of the United States.

https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/01/the-left-the-wall-the-truth/?utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=NR%20Daily%20Monday%20through%20Friday%202019-01-15&utm_term=NRDaily-Smart

Venezuela is the DEMs end game. Everyone is equally poor and the ruling elite dictates what crumbs they will be allowed to have.

DEMs keep talking about the 1%, but what they fail to realize is that there will always be a 1%. The only difference is that in a capitalist society those 1% are responsible for economic prosperity and a healthy middle class. In a socialist society those 1% are responsible for misery and abject poverty.

Socialism doesn’t work. It never has; and yet that is exactly where we are headed with DEMs.

What the Dems fail to mention is that many are the 1% like chuckie and nancy.

Exactly. DEMs don’t really care that there is a 1%, just so long as that 1% is made up of the big government ruling elite.

History demonstrates that it is impossible for big government to raise the poor out of their poverty. The reason is that there will always be those who reside on the bottom rung. The only alternative is to destroy the capitalist society and to make everyone equally poor.

History demonstrates the resultant poverty is worse than anything experienced in a capitalist society. Venezuela is a prime example. DEMs keep saying that’s not what they are looking for, but what they don’t realize is that their radical LW programs will result in exactly that.

Tocqueville’s warnings about democracy’s capacity to generate its own forms of despotism have been portrayed as prefiguring a political dynamic associated with the welfare state: i.e., people voting for politicians who promise to give them more things in return for which voters voluntarily surrender more and more of their freedom.

This very real problem, however, has distracted attention from Tocqueville’s interest in the deeper dynamic at work. This concerns how democracy encourages a focus on an equality of conditions. For Tocqueville, democratic societies’ dominant feature is the craving for equality—not liberty. Throughout Democracy in America , equality of conditions is described as “generative.” By this, Tocqueville meant that a concern for equalization becomes the driving force shaping everything: politics, economics, family life … even religion.

You should read Democracy in America.

We Must Secure The Border And Build The Wall To Make America Safe Again

1 Like

The time is now. The invasion at the border is getting full press. Build the wall with the military. When the courts intervene ignore them. They have no way to enforce their rulings. The military is super majority Republican. Just do it. Build the wall, end birthright citizenship, and exert your dominance.

This is the time, Trump. This can be your Rubicon.

Seriously. What’s stopping Trump from using the military to build the wall for national security reasons?

Can’t he say we’re being invaded, which is true, and command the military to do it? What is the big deal about the national emergency bullshit? Let the courts say whatever they want. Who cares? The courts can’t enforce a damn thing.

Well funded liberal advocacy groups that would instantly sue in the 9th circuit and get a stay of the order from a corrupt (((leftist))) judge

NEW CARAVAN GROWS: A new U.S.-bound caravan that formed in Honduras quickly grew to approximately 2,000 peopleTuesday as it made its way toward Mexico … Mexicans who live along the border towns that will likely be most affected were not very happy and took to the Internet to lash out against another wave of migrants. “Mexico is just like your country," one resident, Belem Gonzales said. “There are many problems and needs, and you’re not going to be much better off than you were in Honduras. Please don’t trust these manipulative agitators who are encouraging you to risk everything for nothing.”

As word of the new caravan’s growth spread, back in Washington the opposing sides in the partial government shutdowncontinued to stand their ground, with no signs of compromise and no end in sight. President Trump said that a “drone flying around” will not stop the new migrant caravan, doubling down on his claims that “Only a Wall will work.” Meanwhile, congressional Democrats rejected Trump’s invitation to a lunch meeting at the White House to discuss border security.

More new democrats on the way.

Andrew Jackson quote springs to mind

John Marshall has made his decision: now let him enforce it!

1 Like

I read the OP title and immediately thought you were talking about Trump. Color me surprised that there is no mention of his role in this mess. MAGA!

Interesting that you have pointed the finger at Trump for having a role in this mess but you don’t explain what that role is.

Is he to blame for requesting funding for what Congress already approved?

Exactly who are you addressing this comment to??

The lib above his post. :wink:

Bolshevik -I am told - means majority.

Which at the time it was named was a lie.