Who is "Gog and Magog"?

tsk, tsk. The dance of the reptiles continues, much to their disgrace and nightmare karma… then listen.

I am not confused about the petty nonsense of the neo-Nazi cults and the karma their lives will mirror.

Which is complete BS, there’s no evidence anywhere suggesting he was ■■■■■■ either by heritage or practice.

Repeating the same Bullshit from the same ■■■ hating conspiracists that has been debunked every way possible isn’t helping your case.

Holocaust deniers already decide they are correct, and anything put forward as evidence is part of a fantasy of a Great ■■■■■■ Conspiracy that defies reason and 100’s of pieces of photographic evidence, as well as many eyewitnesses.

Beyond that. SS officer themselves have testified here are references of a few of them:

Former SS members

Critics of Holocaust denial also include members of the Auschwitz SS. Camp physician and SS- Untersturmführer Hans Münch considered the facts of Auschwitz “so firmly determined that one cannot have any doubt at all”, and described those who negate what happened at the camp as “malevolent” people who have “personal interest to want to bury in silence things that cannot be buried in silence”.[188] Zyklon B handler and SS- Oberscharführer Josef Klehr said that anyone who maintains that nobody was gassed at Auschwitz must be “crazy or in the wrong”.[189] SS- Unterscharführer Oswald Kaduk stated that he did not consider those who maintain such a thing as normal people.[190] Hearing about Holocaust denial compelled former SS- Rottenführer Oskar Gröning to publicly speak about what he witnessed at Auschwitz, and denounce Holocaust deniers,[191] stating:

I would like you to believe me. I saw the gas chambers. I saw the crematoria. I saw the open fires. I was on the ramp when the selections took place. I would like you to believe that these atrocities happened because I was there.[192][193]

The source of this photo calling these Men Khazarian is just a guess. The evidence put forward is that the hats are used by ■■■■■ The hat as adopted by ■■■■■ was the same hats was already used by a number of other peoples. The Boyars. It is acknowledged Khazars adopted the common dress of a very wide geographic range. Notice this photo, does not show any ■■■■■■ emblems.

Correction/EDIT: The photo was found on another web site, of “Vintage ■■■ Photos”. On that site the photo is identified as “Ashkenazi ■■■■ in Jeruselum.”

Similar hats were worn all over Northern and Eastern Europe and Central Asia.

It’s just more fabricated BS.

What else were they going to make cold weather head gear out of before modern synthetics?

1 Like

Taras Bulba statue. The facial hair, hair style, the garb, weapon and hat.

Very common garb etc.

Yep and in ancient times the cloting reflected the local materials.

If you had wool most of your clothes would be wool, if you had fur bearing animals your winter outerwear would be primarily made from skins.

If you had cotton, your summer wear would be cotton etc.

Not that hard to figure and of course as populations began to migrate, willingly or otherwise, they brought their own methods and means of making clothing with them and the local populations added them to their own.

An edit of above post. Russian ■■■■ in Jeruselum

notice this photo contains more background including numerals

caption reads Circa 1885. A group of Ashkenazi ■■■■ in Jerusalem. (Photo by Hulton Archive/Getty Images)

If you do the reverse search on it, that photo has been used thousands of times as just a representation of Ashkenazi ■■■■ dating back to at least the 1940’s but nailing down an original source would take more computer power than I’m willing to dedicate to it.

I did find the exact original source of the cropped image by @digeridoo on a conspiracy forum site
The other is captioned 1885 Ashkenazi in Jeruselem

Well you made me do some looking.

A lot of interesting period photos here.

https://www.vintag.es/2013/09/old-photos-of-■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■

“Respected Historians” my ass, that entire site is dedicated to holocaust denial.

You’d have an easier time finding a needle in a stack of haystacks than finding an actual fact posted there.

Not ‘‘correct’’ per se, we are just open minded enough to see past the propaganda of the last 75 years and ask pertinent questions that cannot be answered.

Ah - Good morning Tel Aviv how are you?

Show your sources then. These are revisionists and outright deniers, not respected.

The issue of the “Asian” ■■■■ posted by @digiridoo, now we see was cropped from an 1885 photo taken in Jerusalem of Ashkenazi Russian ■■■■ in Jerusalem.

All these arguments you pose are arguments, fully refuted for many years.

The term, “holohoax” is used by denier websites and inappropriate…

The Glynns letter, “Hoax” is not about previous death camps and gassing. It was talking about “6 million starving ■■■■■■ Referring to the same number of European ■■■■■ appealing for charity donations. Reminds me of those Charity ads on Fox news.

They weren’t rounded up into death camps, but were persecuted and suffering.

It was Gernany not ■■■■■ repeating craziness so soon in WW1-WW2. ■■■■ were not the only poor suffering people in Europe.

You start with your conclusion first then try to prove it, using tainted evidence, as created by a handful of discredited “scholars” with an obsessive agenda.

The real evidence is overwhelming. Virtually every taking point all deniers share are totally refuted…for years! Nothing you are posting is new many have studied it for many years.

The ■■■■ aren’t perfect. Non-■■■■ developed ant-■■■ attitudes organically and with typical basic prejudice.

■■■■ were not the only people discriminated against because of religious or cultural ties or skin color that rubbed other people the wrong way.

Prejudice has been a constant human flaw all through known history. No group or race is innocent. The workings of the strict Law of Cause and Effect is always at work.

The idea of projecting a massive conspiracy by simple people onto ■■■■ is ridiculous.

.

1 Like

Yes I should have posted that link.

But as I already said, these “questions” were already rehashed and refuted by many, with " open minds"

You use the same cast of characters and then try to rehabilitate Hitler–a truly vile creature.

The hate from deniers is flowing in one direction and it is over the top extremism and refuses to listen to reason.

No matter how annoying ■■■■ in Europe or elsewhere, might have been to people of other cultures it is not grounds for extermination.

Mein Kompf is an insane book by an insane man, Pretending Hitler “respected” the ■■■■ or never ordered them to all be exterminated is completely absurd. What do you think Mein Kompf was saying at the very beginning?

Don’t buy into this bullshit, they don’t “ask questions” they deny it completely.